2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
Database API reference
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
Once you've created your `data models`_, you'll need to retrieve data from the
|
|
|
|
database. This document explains the database abstraction API derived from the
|
|
|
|
models, and how to create, retrieve and update objects.
|
2005-07-15 08:42:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`data models`: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model_api/
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Throughout this reference, we'll refer to the following Poll application::
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Poll(meta.Model):
|
2005-08-26 06:51:30 +08:00
|
|
|
slug = meta.SlugField(unique_for_month='pub_date')
|
|
|
|
question = meta.CharField(maxlength=255)
|
|
|
|
pub_date = meta.DateTimeField()
|
|
|
|
expire_date = meta.DateTimeField()
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
def __repr__(self):
|
|
|
|
return self.question
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
class Choice(meta.Model):
|
2005-08-26 06:51:30 +08:00
|
|
|
poll = meta.ForeignKey(Poll, edit_inline=meta.TABULAR,
|
|
|
|
num_in_admin=10, min_num_in_admin=5)
|
|
|
|
choice = meta.CharField(maxlength=255, core=True)
|
|
|
|
votes = meta.IntegerField(editable=False, default=0)
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
def __repr__(self):
|
|
|
|
return self.choice
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
Basic lookup functions
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
Each model exposes these module-level functions for lookups:
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_object(\**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
---------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns the object matching the given lookup parameters, which should be in
|
|
|
|
the format described in "Field lookups" below. Raises a module-level
|
|
|
|
``*DoesNotExist`` exception if an object wasn't found for the given parameters.
|
|
|
|
Raises ``AssertionError`` if more than one object was found.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_list(\**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns a list of objects matching the given lookup parameters, which should be
|
|
|
|
in the format described in "Field lookups" below. If no objects match the given
|
|
|
|
parameters, it returns an empty list. ``get_list()`` will always return a list.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_iterator(\**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just like ``get_list()``, except it returns an iterator instead of a list. This
|
|
|
|
is more efficient for large result sets. This example shows the difference::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# get_list() loads all objects into memory.
|
|
|
|
for obj in foos.get_list():
|
|
|
|
print repr(obj)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# get_iterator() only loads a number of objects into memory at a time.
|
|
|
|
for obj in foos.get_iterator():
|
|
|
|
print repr(obj)
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_count(\**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
--------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns an integer representing the number of objects in the database matching
|
|
|
|
the given lookup parameters, which should be in the format described in
|
|
|
|
"Field lookups" below. ``get_count()`` never raises exceptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on which database you're using (e.g. PostgreSQL vs. MySQL), this may
|
|
|
|
return a long integer instead of a normal Python integer.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_values(\**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
---------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just like ``get_list()``, except it returns a list of dictionaries instead of
|
|
|
|
model-instance objects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It accepts an optional parameter, ``fields``, which should be a list or tuple
|
|
|
|
of field names. If you don't specify ``fields``, each dictionary in the list
|
|
|
|
returned by ``get_values()`` will have a key and value for each field in the
|
|
|
|
database table. If you specify ``fields``, each dictionary will have only the
|
|
|
|
field keys/values for the fields you specify. Here's an example, using the
|
|
|
|
``Poll`` model defined above::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> from datetime import datetime
|
|
|
|
>>> p1 = polls.Poll(slug='whatsup', question="What's up?",
|
|
|
|
... pub_date=datetime(2005, 2, 20), expire_date=datetime(2005, 3, 20))
|
|
|
|
>>> p1.save()
|
|
|
|
>>> p2 = polls.Poll(slug='name', question="What's your name?",
|
|
|
|
... pub_date=datetime(2005, 3, 20), expire_date=datetime(2005, 4, 20))
|
|
|
|
>>> p2.save()
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_list()
|
|
|
|
[What's up?, What's your name?]
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_values()
|
|
|
|
[{'id': 1, 'slug': 'whatsup', 'question': "What's up?", 'pub_date': datetime.datetime(2005, 2, 20), 'expire_date': datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 20)},
|
|
|
|
{'id': 2, 'slug': 'name', 'question': "What's your name?", 'pub_date': datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 20), 'expire_date': datetime.datetime(2005, 4, 20)}]
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_values(fields=['id', 'slug'])
|
|
|
|
[{'id': 1, 'slug': 'whatsup'}, {'id': 2, 'slug': 'name'}]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use ``get_values()`` when you know you're only going to need a couple of field
|
|
|
|
values and you won't need the functionality of a model instance object. It's
|
|
|
|
more efficient to select only the fields you need to use.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_values_iterator(\**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just like ``get_values()``, except it returns an iterator instead of a list.
|
|
|
|
See the section on ``get_iterator()`` above.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_in_bulk(id_list, \**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Takes a list of IDs and returns a dictionary mapping each ID to an instance of
|
|
|
|
the object with the given ID. Also takes optional keyword lookup arguments,
|
|
|
|
which should be in the format described in "Field lookups" below. Here's an
|
|
|
|
example, using the ``Poll`` model defined above::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> from datetime import datetime
|
|
|
|
>>> p1 = polls.Poll(slug='whatsup', question="What's up?",
|
|
|
|
... pub_date=datetime(2005, 2, 20), expire_date=datetime(2005, 3, 20))
|
|
|
|
>>> p1.save()
|
|
|
|
>>> p2 = polls.Poll(slug='name', question="What's your name?",
|
|
|
|
... pub_date=datetime(2005, 3, 20), expire_date=datetime(2005, 4, 20))
|
|
|
|
>>> p2.save()
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_list()
|
|
|
|
[What's up?, What's your name?]
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_in_bulk([1])
|
|
|
|
{1: What's up?}
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_in_bulk([1, 2])
|
|
|
|
{1: What's up?, 2: What's your name?}
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field lookups
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic field lookups take the form ``field__lookuptype`` (that's a
|
|
|
|
double-underscore). For example::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polls.get_list(pub_date__lte=datetime.datetime.now())
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-05 22:38:22 +08:00
|
|
|
translates (roughly) into the following SQL::
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-22 22:23:07 +08:00
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM polls_polls WHERE pub_date <= NOW();
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-08-05 22:33:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.. admonition:: How this is possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python has the ability to define functions that accept arbitrary name-value
|
|
|
|
arguments whose names and values are evaluated at run time. For more
|
|
|
|
information, see `Keyword Arguments`_ in the official Python tutorial.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
The DB API supports the following lookup types:
|
|
|
|
|
2005-12-05 02:54:44 +08:00
|
|
|
=========== ==============================================================
|
|
|
|
Type Description
|
|
|
|
=========== ==============================================================
|
|
|
|
exact Exact match: ``polls.get_object(id__exact=14)``.
|
|
|
|
iexact Case-insensitive exact match:
|
|
|
|
``polls.get_list(slug__iexact="foo")`` matches a slug of
|
|
|
|
``foo``, ``FOO``, ``fOo``, etc.
|
|
|
|
contains Case-sensitive containment test:
|
|
|
|
``polls.get_list(question__contains="spam")`` returns all polls
|
|
|
|
that contain "spam" in the question. (PostgreSQL and MySQL
|
|
|
|
only. SQLite doesn't support case-sensitive LIKE statements;
|
|
|
|
``contains`` will act like ``icontains`` for SQLite.)
|
|
|
|
icontains Case-insensitive containment test.
|
|
|
|
gt Greater than: ``polls.get_list(id__gt=4)``.
|
|
|
|
gte Greater than or equal to.
|
|
|
|
lt Less than.
|
|
|
|
lte Less than or equal to.
|
|
|
|
ne Not equal to.
|
|
|
|
in In a given list: ``polls.get_list(id__in=[1, 3, 4])`` returns
|
|
|
|
a list of polls whose IDs are either 1, 3 or 4.
|
|
|
|
startswith Case-sensitive starts-with:
|
2006-02-11 05:43:45 +08:00
|
|
|
``polls.get_list(question__startswith="Would")``. (PostgreSQL
|
2005-12-05 02:54:44 +08:00
|
|
|
and MySQL only. SQLite doesn't support case-sensitive LIKE
|
|
|
|
statements; ``startswith`` will act like ``istartswith`` for
|
|
|
|
SQLite.)
|
|
|
|
endswith Case-sensitive ends-with. (PostgreSQL and MySQL only.)
|
|
|
|
istartswith Case-insensitive starts-with.
|
|
|
|
iendswith Case-insensitive ends-with.
|
|
|
|
range Range test:
|
|
|
|
``polls.get_list(pub_date__range=(start_date, end_date))``
|
|
|
|
returns all polls with a pub_date between ``start_date``
|
|
|
|
and ``end_date`` (inclusive).
|
|
|
|
year For date/datetime fields, exact year match:
|
|
|
|
``polls.get_count(pub_date__year=2005)``.
|
|
|
|
month For date/datetime fields, exact month match.
|
|
|
|
day For date/datetime fields, exact day match.
|
|
|
|
isnull True/False; does is IF NULL/IF NOT NULL lookup:
|
|
|
|
``polls.get_list(expire_date__isnull=True)``.
|
|
|
|
=========== ==============================================================
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Multiple lookups are allowed, of course, and are translated as "AND"s::
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polls.get_list(
|
|
|
|
pub_date__year=2005,
|
|
|
|
pub_date__month=1,
|
|
|
|
question__startswith="Would",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
...retrieves all polls published in January 2005 that have a question starting with "Would."
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-07-27 00:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
For convenience, there's a ``pk`` lookup type, which translates into
|
|
|
|
``(primary_key)__exact``. In the polls example, these two statements are
|
|
|
|
equivalent::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polls.get_object(id__exact=3)
|
|
|
|
polls.get_object(pk=3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``pk`` lookups also work across joins. In the polls example, these two
|
|
|
|
statements are equivalent::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
choices.get_list(poll__id__exact=3)
|
|
|
|
choices.get_list(poll__pk=3)
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
If you pass an invalid keyword argument, the function will raise ``TypeError``.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-05 22:33:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.. _`Keyword Arguments`: http://docs.python.org/tut/node6.html#SECTION006720000000000000000
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-30 14:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
OR lookups
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default, multiple lookups are "AND"ed together. If you'd like to use ``OR``
|
|
|
|
statements in your queries, use the ``complex`` lookup type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``complex`` takes an expression of clauses, each of which is an instance of
|
|
|
|
``django.core.meta.Q``. ``Q`` takes an arbitrary number of keyword arguments in
|
|
|
|
the standard Django lookup format. And you can use Python's "and" (``&``) and
|
|
|
|
"or" (``|``) operators to combine ``Q`` instances. For example::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from django.core.meta import Q
|
|
|
|
polls.get_object(complex=(Q(question__startswith='Who') | Q(question__startswith='What')))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``|`` symbol signifies an "OR", so this (roughly) translates into::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM polls
|
|
|
|
WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use ``&`` and ``|`` operators together, and use parenthetical grouping.
|
|
|
|
Example::
|
|
|
|
|
2005-12-22 23:10:01 +08:00
|
|
|
polls.get_object(complex=(Q(question__startswith='Who') & (Q(pub_date__exact=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date__exact=date(2005, 5, 6))))
|
2005-11-30 14:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This roughly translates into::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM polls
|
|
|
|
WHERE question LIKE 'Who%'
|
|
|
|
AND (pub_date = '2005-05-02' OR pub_date = '2005-05-06');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the `OR lookups examples page`_ for more examples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _OR lookups examples page: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/or_lookups/
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
Ordering
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results are automatically ordered by the ordering tuple given by the
|
|
|
|
``ordering`` key in the model, but the ordering may be explicitly
|
|
|
|
provided by the ``order_by`` argument to a lookup::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polls.get_list(
|
|
|
|
pub_date__year=2005,
|
|
|
|
pub_date__month=1,
|
2005-07-23 02:45:22 +08:00
|
|
|
order_by=('-pub_date', 'question'),
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-23 02:45:22 +08:00
|
|
|
The result set above will be ordered by ``pub_date`` descending, then
|
|
|
|
by ``question`` ascending. The negative sign in front of "-pub_date" indicates
|
|
|
|
descending order. Ascending order is implied. To order randomly, use "?", like
|
|
|
|
so::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polls.get_list(order_by=['?'])
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-21 04:23:57 +08:00
|
|
|
To order by a field in a different table, add the other table's name and a dot,
|
|
|
|
like so::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
choices.get_list(order_by=('polls.pub_date', 'choice'))
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-03 04:31:12 +08:00
|
|
|
There's no way to specify whether ordering should be case sensitive. With
|
|
|
|
respect to case-sensitivity, Django will order results however your database
|
|
|
|
backend normally orders them.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
Relationships (joins)
|
|
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joins may implicitly be performed by following relationships:
|
|
|
|
``choices.get_list(poll__slug__exact="eggs")`` fetches a list of ``Choice``
|
|
|
|
objects where the associated ``Poll`` has a slug of ``eggs``. Multiple levels
|
|
|
|
of joins are allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Given an instance of an object, related objects can be looked-up directly using
|
|
|
|
convenience functions. For example, if ``p`` is a ``Poll`` instance,
|
|
|
|
``p.get_choice_list()`` will return a list of all associated choices. Astute
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
readers will note that this is the same as
|
2006-02-02 13:13:39 +08:00
|
|
|
``choices.get_list(poll__id__exact=p.id)``, except clearer.
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each type of relationship creates a set of methods on each object in the
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
relationship. These methods are created in both directions, so objects that are
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
"related-to" need not explicitly define reverse relationships; that happens
|
|
|
|
automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-one relations
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-26 06:51:30 +08:00
|
|
|
Each object in a one-to-one relationship will have a ``get_relatedobjectname()``
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
method. For example::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Place(meta.Model):
|
2005-08-26 06:51:30 +08:00
|
|
|
# ...
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Restaurant(meta.Model):
|
2005-08-26 06:51:30 +08:00
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
the_place = meta.OneToOneField(places.Place)
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the above example, each ``Place`` will have a ``get_restaurant()`` method,
|
2006-01-09 08:51:48 +08:00
|
|
|
and each ``Restaurant`` will have a ``get_the_place()`` method.
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many-to-one relations
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
In each many-to-one relationship, the related object will have a
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
``get_relatedobject()`` method, and the related-to object will have
|
|
|
|
``get_relatedobject()``, ``get_relatedobject_list()``, and
|
|
|
|
``get_relatedobject_count()`` methods (the same as the module-level
|
|
|
|
``get_object()``, ``get_list()``, and ``get_count()`` methods).
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
In the poll example above, here are the available choice methods on a ``Poll`` object ``p``::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p.get_choice()
|
|
|
|
p.get_choice_list()
|
|
|
|
p.get_choice_count()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And a ``Choice`` object ``c`` has the following method::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c.get_poll()
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many-to-many relations
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many-to-many relations result in the same set of methods as `Many-to-one relations`_,
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
except that the ``get_relatedobject_list()`` function on the related object will
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
return a list of instances instead of a single instance. So, if the relationship
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
between ``Poll`` and ``Choice`` was many-to-many, ``choice.get_poll_list()`` would
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
return a list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationships across applications
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a relation spans applications -- if ``Place`` was had a ManyToOne relation to
|
|
|
|
a ``geo.City`` object, for example -- the name of the other application will be
|
|
|
|
added to the method, i.e. ``place.get_geo_city()`` and
|
|
|
|
``city.get_places_place_list()``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selecting related objects
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relations are the bread and butter of databases, so there's an option to "follow"
|
|
|
|
all relationships and pre-fill them in a simple cache so that later calls to
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
objects with a one-to-many relationship don't have to hit the database. Do this by
|
|
|
|
passing ``select_related=True`` to a lookup. This results in (sometimes much) larger
|
|
|
|
queries, but it means that later use of relationships is much faster.
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, using the Poll and Choice models from above, if you do the following::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c = choices.get_object(id__exact=5, select_related=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then subsequent calls to ``c.get_poll()`` won't hit the database.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Note that ``select_related`` follows foreign keys as far as possible. If you have the
|
2005-07-15 05:04:21 +08:00
|
|
|
following models::
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Poll(meta.Model):
|
2005-08-26 06:51:30 +08:00
|
|
|
# ...
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Choice(meta.Model):
|
2005-08-26 06:51:30 +08:00
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
poll = meta.ForeignKey(Poll)
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SingleVote(meta.Model):
|
2005-08-26 06:51:30 +08:00
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
choice = meta.ForeignKey(Choice)
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 05:04:21 +08:00
|
|
|
then a call to ``singlevotes.get_object(id__exact=4, select_related=True)`` will
|
|
|
|
cache the related choice *and* the related poll::
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> sv = singlevotes.get_object(id__exact=4, select_related=True)
|
|
|
|
>>> c = sv.get_choice() # Doesn't hit the database.
|
|
|
|
>>> p = c.get_poll() # Doesn't hit the database.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> sv = singlevotes.get_object(id__exact=4) # Note no "select_related".
|
|
|
|
>>> c = sv.get_choice() # Hits the database.
|
|
|
|
>>> p = c.get_poll() # Hits the database.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
Limiting selected rows
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``limit``, ``offset``, and ``distinct`` keywords can be used to control
|
|
|
|
which rows are returned. Both ``limit`` and ``offset`` should be integers which
|
|
|
|
will be directly passed to the SQL ``LIMIT``/``OFFSET`` commands.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
If ``distinct`` is True, only distinct rows will be returned. This is equivalent
|
2005-12-29 03:18:48 +08:00
|
|
|
to a ``SELECT DISTINCT`` SQL clause. You can use this with ``get_values()`` to
|
|
|
|
get distinct values. For example, this returns the distinct first_names::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> people.get_values(fields=['first_name'], distinct=True)
|
|
|
|
[{'first_name': 'Adrian'}, {'first_name': 'Jacob'}, {'first_name': 'Simon'}]
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other lookup options
|
|
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few other ways of more directly controlling the generated SQL
|
|
|
|
for the lookup. Note that by definition these extra lookups may not be
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
portable to different database engines (because you're explicitly writing
|
|
|
|
SQL code) and should be avoided if possible.:
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``params``
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All the extra-SQL params described below may use standard Python string
|
|
|
|
formatting codes to indicate parameters that the database engine will
|
|
|
|
automatically quote. The ``params`` argument can contain any extra
|
|
|
|
parameters to be substituted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``select``
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``select`` keyword allows you to select extra fields. This should be a
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
dictionary mapping attribute names to a SQL clause to use to calculate that
|
|
|
|
attribute. For example::
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polls.get_list(
|
|
|
|
select={
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
'choice_count': 'SELECT COUNT(*) FROM choices WHERE poll_id = polls.id'
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Each of the resulting ``Poll`` objects will have an extra attribute, ``choice_count``,
|
|
|
|
an integer count of associated ``Choice`` objects. Note that the parenthesis required by
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
most database engines around sub-selects are not required in Django's ``select``
|
|
|
|
clauses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``where`` / ``tables``
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to explicitly pass extra ``WHERE`` clauses -- perhaps to perform
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
non-explicit joins -- use the ``where`` keyword. If you need to
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
join other tables into your query, you can pass their names to ``tables``.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 03:25:13 +08:00
|
|
|
``where`` and ``tables`` both take a list of strings. All ``where`` parameters
|
|
|
|
are "AND"ed to any other search criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polls.get_list(question__startswith='Who', where=['id IN (3, 4, 5, 20)'])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...translates (roughly) into the following SQL:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM polls_polls WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' AND id IN (3, 4, 5, 20);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-15 08:42:28 +08:00
|
|
|
Changing objects
|
|
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-16 02:40:21 +08:00
|
|
|
Once you've retrieved an object from the database using any of the above
|
2005-07-15 08:42:28 +08:00
|
|
|
options, changing it is extremely easy. Make changes directly to the
|
|
|
|
objects fields, then call the object's ``save()`` method::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> p = polls.get_object(id__exact=15)
|
|
|
|
>>> p.slug = "new_slug"
|
|
|
|
>>> p.pub_date = datetime.datetime.now()
|
|
|
|
>>> p.save()
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-13 09:25:57 +08:00
|
|
|
Creating new objects
|
|
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
Creating new objects (i.e. ``INSERT``) is done by creating new instances
|
|
|
|
of objects then calling save() on them::
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-02 00:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> p = polls.Poll(slug="eggs",
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
... question="How do you like your eggs?",
|
|
|
|
... pub_date=datetime.datetime.now(),
|
|
|
|
... expire_date=some_future_date)
|
|
|
|
>>> p.save()
|
2005-07-19 23:24:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
Calling ``save()`` on an object with a primary key whose value is ``None``
|
|
|
|
signifies to Django that the object is new and should be inserted.
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
Related objects (e.g. ``Choices``) are created using convenience functions::
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> p.add_choice(choice="Over easy", votes=0)
|
|
|
|
>>> p.add_choice(choice="Scrambled", votes=0)
|
|
|
|
>>> p.add_choice(choice="Fertilized", votes=0)
|
|
|
|
>>> p.add_choice(choice="Poached", votes=0)
|
|
|
|
>>> p.get_choice_count()
|
|
|
|
4
|
2005-07-19 23:24:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-11 04:18:56 +08:00
|
|
|
Each of those ``add_choice`` methods is equivalent to (but much simpler than)::
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> c = polls.Choice(poll_id=p.id, choice="Over easy", votes=0)
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> c.save()
|
2005-07-19 23:24:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
Note that when using the `add_foo()`` methods, you do not give any value
|
2005-07-19 23:24:03 +08:00
|
|
|
for the ``id`` field, nor do you give a value for the field that stores
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
the relation (``poll_id`` in this case).
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-11 04:18:56 +08:00
|
|
|
The ``add_FOO()`` method always returns the newly created object.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-16 04:37:03 +08:00
|
|
|
Deleting objects
|
|
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
The delete method, conveniently, is named ``delete()``. This method immediately
|
|
|
|
deletes the object and has no return value. Example::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> c.delete()
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 06:58:35 +08:00
|
|
|
Comparing objects
|
|
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To compare two model objects, just use the standard Python comparison operator,
|
|
|
|
the double equals sign: ``==``. Behind the scenes, that compares the primary
|
|
|
|
key values of two models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the ``Poll`` example above, the following two statements are equivalent::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
some_poll == other_poll
|
|
|
|
some_poll.id == other_poll.id
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a model's primary key isn't called ID, no problem. Comparisons will always
|
|
|
|
use the primary key, whatever it's called. For example, if a model's primary
|
|
|
|
key field is called ``name``, these two statements are equivalent::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
some_obj == other_obj
|
|
|
|
some_obj.name == other_obj.name
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
Extra instance methods
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to ``save()``, ``delete()`` and all of the ``add_*`` and ``get_*``
|
|
|
|
related-object methods, a model object might get any or all of the following
|
|
|
|
methods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_FOO_display()
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For every field that has ``choices`` set, the object will have a
|
|
|
|
``get_FOO_display()`` method, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This
|
|
|
|
method returns the "human-readable" value of the field. For example, in the
|
|
|
|
following model::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENDER_CHOICES = (
|
|
|
|
('M', 'Male'),
|
|
|
|
('F', 'Female'),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
class Person
|
|
|
|
name = meta.CharField(maxlength=20)
|
|
|
|
gender = meta.CharField(maxlength=1, choices=GENDER_CHOICES)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...each ``Person`` instance will have a ``get_gender_display()`` method. Example::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> p = Person(name='John', gender='M')
|
|
|
|
>>> p.save()
|
|
|
|
>>> p.gender
|
|
|
|
'M'
|
|
|
|
>>> p.get_gender_display()
|
|
|
|
'Male'
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_next_by_FOO(\**kwargs) and get_previous_by_FOO(\**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For every ``DateField`` and ``DateTimeField`` that does not have ``null=True``,
|
|
|
|
the object will have ``get_next_by_FOO()`` and ``get_previous_by_FOO()``
|
|
|
|
methods, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the next and
|
|
|
|
previous object with respect to the date field, raising the appropriate
|
|
|
|
``*DoesNotExist`` exception when appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both methods accept optional keyword arguments, which should be in the format
|
|
|
|
described in "Field lookups" above.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-10 13:36:41 +08:00
|
|
|
Note that in the case of identical date values, these methods will use the ID
|
|
|
|
as a fallback check. This guarantees that no records are skipped or duplicated.
|
|
|
|
For a full example, see the `lookup API sample model_`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _lookup API sample model: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/lookup/
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
get_FOO_filename()
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For every ``FileField``, the object will have a ``get_FOO_filename()`` method,
|
|
|
|
where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the full filesystem path
|
|
|
|
to the file, according to your ``MEDIA_ROOT`` setting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that ``ImageField`` is technically a subclass of ``FileField``, so every
|
|
|
|
model with an ``ImageField`` will also get this method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_FOO_url()
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-01 00:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
For every ``FileField``, the object will have a ``get_FOO_url()`` method,
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the full URL to the file,
|
|
|
|
according to your ``MEDIA_URL`` setting. If the value is blank, this method
|
|
|
|
returns an empty string.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_FOO_size()
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-11 11:33:19 +08:00
|
|
|
For every ``FileField``, the object will have a ``get_FOO_size()`` method,
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the size of the file, in
|
|
|
|
bytes. (Behind the scenes, it uses ``os.path.getsize``.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
save_FOO_file(filename, raw_contents)
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-11 11:33:19 +08:00
|
|
|
For every ``FileField``, the object will have a ``save_FOO_file()`` method,
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This saves the given file to the
|
|
|
|
filesystem, using the given filename. If a file with the given filename already
|
|
|
|
exists, Django adds an underscore to the end of the filename (but before the
|
|
|
|
extension) until the filename is available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_FOO_height() and get_FOO_width()
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For every ``ImageField``, the object will have ``get_FOO_height()`` and
|
|
|
|
``get_FOO_width()`` methods, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This
|
|
|
|
returns the height (or width) of the image, as an integer, in pixels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extra module functions
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to every function described in "Basic lookup functions" above, a
|
|
|
|
model module might get any or all of the following methods:
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:53:06 +08:00
|
|
|
get_FOO_list(kind, \**kwargs)
|
2005-09-26 05:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For every ``DateField`` and ``DateTimeField``, the model module will have a
|
|
|
|
``get_FOO_list()`` function, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This
|
|
|
|
returns a list of ``datetime.datetime`` objects representing all available
|
|
|
|
dates of the given scope, as defined by the ``kind`` argument. ``kind`` should
|
|
|
|
be either ``"year"``, ``"month"`` or ``"day"``. Each ``datetime.datetime``
|
|
|
|
object in the result list is "truncated" to the given ``type``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``"year"`` returns a list of all distinct year values for the field.
|
|
|
|
* ``"month"`` returns a list of all distinct year/month values for the field.
|
|
|
|
* ``"day"`` returns a list of all distinct year/month/day values for the field.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-06 06:47:36 +08:00
|
|
|
Additional, optional keyword arguments, in the format described in
|
|
|
|
"Field lookups" above, are also accepted.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
Here's an example, using the ``Poll`` model defined above::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> from datetime import datetime
|
|
|
|
>>> p1 = polls.Poll(slug='whatsup', question="What's up?",
|
|
|
|
... pub_date=datetime(2005, 2, 20), expire_date=datetime(2005, 3, 20))
|
|
|
|
>>> p1.save()
|
|
|
|
>>> p2 = polls.Poll(slug='name', question="What's your name?",
|
|
|
|
... pub_date=datetime(2005, 3, 20), expire_date=datetime(2005, 4, 20))
|
|
|
|
>>> p2.save()
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_pub_date_list('year')
|
|
|
|
[datetime.datetime(2005, 1, 1)]
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_pub_date_list('month')
|
|
|
|
[datetime.datetime(2005, 2, 1), datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 1)]
|
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_pub_date_list('day')
|
|
|
|
[datetime.datetime(2005, 2, 20), datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 20)]
|
2005-10-06 06:47:36 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> polls.get_pub_date_list('day', question__contains='name')
|
|
|
|
[datetime.datetime(2005, 3, 20)]
|
2005-09-26 05:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``get_FOO_list()`` also accepts an optional keyword argument ``order``, which
|
|
|
|
should be either ``"ASC"`` or ``"DESC"``. This specifies how to order the
|
|
|
|
results. Default is ``"ASC"``.
|