Fixed #10064 -- Corrected handling of aggregate queries that also use select_related(). Thanks to olivius for the report.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9781 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
parent
728108883a
commit
39516803f1
|
@ -250,11 +250,12 @@ class BaseQuery(object):
|
|||
|
||||
if self.aggregate_select:
|
||||
aggregate_start = len(self.extra_select.keys()) + len(self.select)
|
||||
aggregate_end = aggregate_start + len(self.aggregate_select)
|
||||
row = tuple(row[:aggregate_start]) + tuple([
|
||||
self.resolve_aggregate(value, aggregate)
|
||||
for (alias, aggregate), value
|
||||
in zip(self.aggregate_select.items(), row[aggregate_start:])
|
||||
])
|
||||
in zip(self.aggregate_select.items(), row[aggregate_start:aggregate_end])
|
||||
]) + tuple(row[aggregate_end:])
|
||||
|
||||
yield row
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'foo' into field. Choices are: authors, id, i
|
|||
>>> Book.objects.aggregate(number=Max('pages'), select=Max('pages'))
|
||||
{'number': 1132, 'select': 1132}
|
||||
|
||||
# Regression for #10064: select_related() plays nice with aggregates
|
||||
>>> Book.objects.select_related('publisher').annotate(num_authors=Count('authors')).values()[0]
|
||||
{'rating': 4.0, 'isbn': u'013790395', 'name': u'Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach', 'pubdate': datetime.date(1995, 1, 15), 'price': Decimal("82.8..."), 'id': 5, 'num_authors': 2, 'publisher_id': 3, 'pages': 1132}
|
||||
|
||||
"""
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue