[1.6.x] Fixed #21650 -- Corrected bad advice for plural translation.
Thanks nedbatchelder and claudep.
Backport of 85270ef3f5
from master
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3a9a76123
commit
3b79fbabcd
|
@ -206,7 +206,9 @@ For example::
|
|||
In this example the number of objects is passed to the translation
|
||||
languages as the ``count`` variable.
|
||||
|
||||
Lets see a slightly more complex usage example::
|
||||
Note that pluralization is complicated and works differently in each language.
|
||||
Comparing ``count`` to 1 isn't always the correct rule. This code looks
|
||||
sophisticated, but will produce incorrect results for some languages::
|
||||
|
||||
from django.utils.translation import ungettext
|
||||
from myapp.models import Report
|
||||
|
@ -226,34 +228,37 @@ Lets see a slightly more complex usage example::
|
|||
'name': name
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Here we reuse localizable, hopefully already translated literals (contained in
|
||||
the ``verbose_name`` and ``verbose_name_plural`` model ``Meta`` options) for
|
||||
other parts of the sentence so all of it is consistently based on the
|
||||
cardinality of the elements at play.
|
||||
Don't try to implement your own singular-or-plural logic, it won't be correct.
|
||||
In a case like this, consider something like the following::
|
||||
|
||||
text = ungettext(
|
||||
'There is %(count)d %(name)s object available.',
|
||||
'There are %(count)d %(name)s objects available.',
|
||||
count
|
||||
) % {
|
||||
'count': count,
|
||||
'name': Report._meta.verbose_name,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.. _pluralization-var-notes:
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
When using this technique, make sure you use a single name for every
|
||||
extrapolated variable included in the literal. In the example above note how
|
||||
we used the ``name`` Python variable in both translation strings. This
|
||||
example would fail::
|
||||
When using ``ungettext()``, make sure you use a single name for every
|
||||
extrapolated variable included in the literal. In the examples above, note
|
||||
how we used the ``name`` Python variable in both translation strings. This
|
||||
example, besides being incorrect in some languages as noted above, would
|
||||
fail::
|
||||
|
||||
from django.utils.translation import ungettext
|
||||
from myapp.models import Report
|
||||
|
||||
count = Report.objects.count()
|
||||
d = {
|
||||
'count': count,
|
||||
'name': Report._meta.verbose_name,
|
||||
'plural_name': Report._meta.verbose_name_plural
|
||||
}
|
||||
text = ungettext(
|
||||
'There is %(count)d %(name)s available.',
|
||||
'There are %(count)d %(plural_name)s available.',
|
||||
count
|
||||
) % d
|
||||
) % {
|
||||
'count': Report.objects.count(),
|
||||
'name': Report._meta.verbose_name,
|
||||
'plural_name': Report._meta.verbose_name_plural
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
You would get an error when running :djadmin:`django-admin.py
|
||||
compilemessages <compilemessages>`::
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue