Fixed #1049 -- Documented the need to implement flatten_data() in some cases for custom
ChangeManipulator replacements. Thanks, Michael Radziej. git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@4711 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
parent
db03c7fa1d
commit
5295f54b3c
|
@ -417,6 +417,27 @@ Here's a simple function that might drive the above form::
|
|||
form = forms.FormWrapper(manipulator, new_data, errors)
|
||||
return render_to_response('contact_form.html', {'form': form})
|
||||
|
||||
Implementing ``flatten_data`` for custom manipulators
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
It is possible (although rarely needed) to replace the default automatically
|
||||
created manipulators on a model with your own custom manipulators. If you do
|
||||
this and you are intending to use those models in generic views, you should
|
||||
also define a ``flatten_data`` method in any ``ChangeManipulator`` replacement.
|
||||
This should act like the default ``flatten_data`` and return a dictionary
|
||||
mapping field names to their values, like so::
|
||||
|
||||
def flatten_data(self):
|
||||
obj = self.original_object
|
||||
return dict(
|
||||
from = obj.from,
|
||||
subject = obj.subject,
|
||||
...
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
In this way, your new change manipulator will act exactly like the default
|
||||
version.
|
||||
|
||||
``FileField`` and ``ImageField`` special cases
|
||||
==============================================
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue