[1.5.x] Documentation -- added instructions on working with pull requests

Since non-core contributors are asked to review patches, instructions
on working with pull requests were added to the Working with Git and
GitHub page (based on the existing instructions in the core
committers page).

Backport of 990ce9aab9 from master
This commit is contained in:
Kevin Christopher Henry 2013-09-12 19:01:47 -04:00 committed by Tim Graham
parent 169594f5ae
commit 61867e226d
2 changed files with 24 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ Decisions on new committers will follow the process explained in
existing committer privately. Public requests for commit access are potential existing committer privately. Public requests for commit access are potential
flame-war starters, and will simply be ignored. flame-war starters, and will simply be ignored.
.. _handling-pull-requests:
Handling pull requests Handling pull requests
---------------------- ----------------------

View File

@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ This way your branch will contain only commits related to its topic, which
makes squashing easier. makes squashing easier.
After review After review
------------ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is unusual to get any non-trivial amount of code into core without changes It is unusual to get any non-trivial amount of code into core without changes
requested by reviewers. In this case, it is often a good idea to add the requested by reviewers. In this case, it is often a good idea to add the
@ -225,7 +225,8 @@ commits, you would run::
git rebase -i HEAD~2 git rebase -i HEAD~2
Squash the second commit into the first. Write a commit message along the lines of:: Squash the second commit into the first. Write a commit message along the lines
of::
Made changes asked in review by <reviewer> Made changes asked in review by <reviewer>
@ -239,8 +240,25 @@ the public commits during the rebase, you should not need to force-push::
Your pull request should now contain the new commit too. Your pull request should now contain the new commit too.
Note that the committer is likely to squash the review commit into the previous commit Note that the committer is likely to squash the review commit into the previous
when committing the code. commit when committing the code.
Working on a patch
------------------
One of the ways that developers can contribute to Django is by reviewing
patches. Those patches will typically exist as pull requests on GitHub and
can be easily integrated into your local repository::
git checkout -b pull_xxxxx upstream/master
curl https://github.com/django/django/pull/xxxxx.patch | git am
This will create a new branch and then apply the changes from the pull request
to it. At this point you can run the tests or do anything else you need to
do to investigate the quality of the patch.
For more detail on working with pull requests see the
:ref:`guidelines for committers <handling-pull-requests>`.
Summary Summary
------- -------