Fixed is_safe_url() to handle leading whitespace.
This is a security fix. Disclosure following shortly.
This commit is contained in:
parent
316b8d4974
commit
69b5e66738
|
@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ def is_safe_url(url, host=None):
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
if not url:
|
if not url:
|
||||||
return False
|
return False
|
||||||
|
url = url.strip()
|
||||||
# Chrome treats \ completely as /
|
# Chrome treats \ completely as /
|
||||||
url = url.replace('\\', '/')
|
url = url.replace('\\', '/')
|
||||||
# Chrome considers any URL with more than two slashes to be absolute, but
|
# Chrome considers any URL with more than two slashes to be absolute, but
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -31,6 +31,20 @@ development server now does the same. Django's development server is not
|
||||||
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
|
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
|
||||||
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
|
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
|
||||||
|
=============================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
|
||||||
|
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
|
||||||
|
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
|
||||||
|
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
|
||||||
|
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
|
||||||
|
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
|
||||||
|
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer
|
||||||
|
from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put
|
||||||
|
this URL into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore
|
||||||
|
JavaScript there.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Bugfixes
|
Bugfixes
|
||||||
========
|
========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -29,3 +29,17 @@ containing underscores from incoming requests by default. Django's built-in
|
||||||
development server now does the same. Django's development server is not
|
development server now does the same. Django's development server is not
|
||||||
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
|
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
|
||||||
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
|
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
|
||||||
|
=============================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
|
||||||
|
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
|
||||||
|
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
|
||||||
|
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
|
||||||
|
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
|
||||||
|
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
|
||||||
|
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer
|
||||||
|
from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put
|
||||||
|
this URL into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore
|
||||||
|
JavaScript there.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -30,6 +30,20 @@ development server now does the same. Django's development server is not
|
||||||
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
|
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
|
||||||
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
|
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
|
||||||
|
=============================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
|
||||||
|
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
|
||||||
|
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
|
||||||
|
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
|
||||||
|
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
|
||||||
|
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
|
||||||
|
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer
|
||||||
|
from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put
|
||||||
|
this URL into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore
|
||||||
|
JavaScript there.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Bugfixes
|
Bugfixes
|
||||||
========
|
========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ class TestUtilsHttp(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||||
'http:/\//example.com',
|
'http:/\//example.com',
|
||||||
'http:\/example.com',
|
'http:\/example.com',
|
||||||
'http:/\example.com',
|
'http:/\example.com',
|
||||||
'javascript:alert("XSS")'):
|
'javascript:alert("XSS")',
|
||||||
|
'\njavascript:alert(x)'):
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(http.is_safe_url(bad_url, host='testserver'), "%s should be blocked" % bad_url)
|
self.assertFalse(http.is_safe_url(bad_url, host='testserver'), "%s should be blocked" % bad_url)
|
||||||
for good_url in ('/view/?param=http://example.com',
|
for good_url in ('/view/?param=http://example.com',
|
||||||
'/view/?param=https://example.com',
|
'/view/?param=https://example.com',
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue