Fixed is_safe_url() to handle leading whitespace.

This is a security fix. Disclosure following shortly.
This commit is contained in:
Tim Graham 2014-12-03 16:14:00 -05:00
parent 316b8d4974
commit 69b5e66738
5 changed files with 45 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ def is_safe_url(url, host=None):
""" """
if not url: if not url:
return False return False
url = url.strip()
# Chrome treats \ completely as / # Chrome treats \ completely as /
url = url.replace('\\', '/') url = url.replace('\\', '/')
# Chrome considers any URL with more than two slashes to be absolute, but # Chrome considers any URL with more than two slashes to be absolute, but

View File

@ -31,6 +31,20 @@ development server now does the same. Django's development server is not
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment. servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
=============================================================
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer
from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put
this URL into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore
JavaScript there.
Bugfixes Bugfixes
======== ========

View File

@ -29,3 +29,17 @@ containing underscores from incoming requests by default. Django's built-in
development server now does the same. Django's development server is not development server now does the same. Django's development server is not
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment. servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
=============================================================
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer
from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put
this URL into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore
JavaScript there.

View File

@ -30,6 +30,20 @@ development server now does the same. Django's development server is not
recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment. servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
=============================================================
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer
from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put
this URL into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore
JavaScript there.
Bugfixes Bugfixes
======== ========

View File

@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ class TestUtilsHttp(unittest.TestCase):
'http:/\//example.com', 'http:/\//example.com',
'http:\/example.com', 'http:\/example.com',
'http:/\example.com', 'http:/\example.com',
'javascript:alert("XSS")'): 'javascript:alert("XSS")',
'\njavascript:alert(x)'):
self.assertFalse(http.is_safe_url(bad_url, host='testserver'), "%s should be blocked" % bad_url) self.assertFalse(http.is_safe_url(bad_url, host='testserver'), "%s should be blocked" % bad_url)
for good_url in ('/view/?param=http://example.com', for good_url in ('/view/?param=http://example.com',
'/view/?param=https://example.com', '/view/?param=https://example.com',