From 5124ab7620a2cb448a8edec7eb6cfa69c60bcc8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 10:36:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] add comment to explain why it's necessary to do an explicit
 check for Python2 and how metaclasses are defined

---
 tests/base/models.py | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/base/models.py b/tests/base/models.py
index bddb406820..d47ddcfd66 100644
--- a/tests/base/models.py
+++ b/tests/base/models.py
@@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ class CustomBaseModel(models.base.ModelBase):
 
 
 class MyModel(six.with_metaclass(CustomBaseModel, models.Model)):
-        """Model subclass with a custom base using six.with_metaclass."""
+    """Model subclass with a custom base using six.with_metaclass."""
 
+# This is done to ensure that for Python2 only, defining metaclasses
+# still does not fail to create the model.
 
 if not six.PY3:
     class MyModel(models.Model):