From 7e7e447b40d934aedd2f4b1fdc2d9aaef164ade0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Robenolt Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 11:59:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [1.8.x] Removed obsolete note about sentry/raven not handling WSGI properly. 2.0.7 was released in 2012. Backport of 514fee82a18e2b8fed0b6e31a95bd7a1a94980ab from master --- docs/howto/deployment/wsgi/index.txt | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/howto/deployment/wsgi/index.txt b/docs/howto/deployment/wsgi/index.txt index 128e296ad6..a6c7d4b229 100644 --- a/docs/howto/deployment/wsgi/index.txt +++ b/docs/howto/deployment/wsgi/index.txt @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ to combine a Django application with a WSGI application of another framework. .. note:: Some third-party WSGI middleware do not call ``close`` on the response - object after handling a request — most notably Sentry's error reporting - middleware up to version 2.0.7. In those cases the + object after handling a request. In those cases the :data:`~django.core.signals.request_finished` signal isn't sent. This can result in idle connections to database and memcache servers.