Fixed #10425 -- Corrected the interaction of .count() with .annotate() when .values() is also involved. Thanks to kmassey for the report.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@10053 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
parent
83c1572cc4
commit
84ce18fc9b
|
@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ class BaseQuery(object):
|
|||
Performs a COUNT() query using the current filter constraints.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
obj = self.clone()
|
||||
if len(self.select) > 1:
|
||||
if len(self.select) > 1 or self.aggregate_select:
|
||||
# If a select clause exists, then the query has already started to
|
||||
# specify the columns that are to be returned.
|
||||
# In this case, we need to use a subquery to evaluate the count.
|
||||
|
@ -1950,6 +1950,7 @@ class BaseQuery(object):
|
|||
# Clear out the select cache to reflect the new unmasked aggregates.
|
||||
self.aggregates = {None: count}
|
||||
self.set_aggregate_mask(None)
|
||||
self.group_by = None
|
||||
|
||||
def add_select_related(self, fields):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -252,6 +252,13 @@ FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'foo' into field. Choices are: authors, conta
|
|||
>>> [int(x['sheets']) for x in qs]
|
||||
[150, 175, 224, 264, 473, 566]
|
||||
|
||||
# Regression for 10425 - annotations don't get in the way of a count() clause
|
||||
>>> Book.objects.values('publisher').annotate(Count('publisher')).count()
|
||||
4
|
||||
|
||||
>>> Book.objects.annotate(Count('publisher')).values('publisher').count()
|
||||
6
|
||||
|
||||
"""
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue