Fixed #13739 -- Updated release notes to make a note of the changes to Field.db_type.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@13350 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
parent
2597f31ed4
commit
ab908685fb
|
@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ Overview
|
|||
Django 1.2 introduces several large, important new features, including:
|
||||
|
||||
* Support for `multiple database connections`_ in a single Django instance.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* `Model validation`_ inspired by Django's form validation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* Vastly `improved protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery`_ (CSRF).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* A new `user "messages" framework`_ with support for cookie- and session-based
|
||||
message for both anonymous and authenticated users.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ be found below`_.
|
|||
|
||||
.. seealso::
|
||||
|
||||
`Django Advent`_ covered the release of Django 1.2 with a series of
|
||||
`Django Advent`_ covered the release of Django 1.2 with a series of
|
||||
articles and tutorials that cover some of the new features in depth.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _django advent: http://djangoadvent.com/
|
||||
|
||||
Wherever possible these features have been introduced in a backwards-compatible
|
||||
|
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ backwards-incompatible. The big changes are:
|
|||
* The new CSRF protection framework is not backwards-compatible with
|
||||
the old system. Users of the old system will not be affected until
|
||||
the old system is removed in Django 1.4.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
However, upgrading to the new CSRF protection framework requires a few
|
||||
important backwards-incompatible changes, detailed in `CSRF Protection`_,
|
||||
below.
|
||||
|
@ -74,12 +74,12 @@ backwards-incompatible. The big changes are:
|
|||
* Authors of custom :class:`~django.db.models.Field` subclasses should be
|
||||
aware that a number of methods have had a change in prototype, detailed
|
||||
under `get_db_prep_*() methods on Field`_, below.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* The internals of template tags have changed somewhat; authors of custom
|
||||
template tags that need to store state (e.g. custom control flow tags)
|
||||
should ensure that their code follows the new rules for `stateful template
|
||||
tags`_
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* The :func:`~django.contrib.auth.decorators.user_passes_test`,
|
||||
:func:`~django.contrib.auth.decorators.login_required`, and
|
||||
:func:`~django.contrib.auth.decorators.permission_required`, decorators
|
||||
|
@ -435,6 +435,8 @@ database-compatible values. A custom field might look something like::
|
|||
|
||||
class CustomModelField(models.Field):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
def db_type(self):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
|
||||
def get_db_prep_save(self, value):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
|
@ -451,6 +453,9 @@ two extra methods have been introduced::
|
|||
class CustomModelField(models.Field):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
|
||||
def db_type(self, connection):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
|
||||
def get_prep_value(self, value):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -467,10 +472,10 @@ two extra methods have been introduced::
|
|||
# ...
|
||||
|
||||
These changes are required to support multiple databases --
|
||||
``get_db_prep_*`` can no longer make any assumptions regarding the
|
||||
database for which it is preparing. The ``connection`` argument now
|
||||
provides the preparation methods with the specific connection for
|
||||
which the value is being prepared.
|
||||
``db_type`` and ``get_db_prep_*`` can no longer make any assumptions
|
||||
regarding the database for which it is preparing. The ``connection``
|
||||
argument now provides the preparation methods with the specific
|
||||
connection for which the value is being prepared.
|
||||
|
||||
The two new methods exist to differentiate general data-preparation
|
||||
requirements from requirements that are database-specific. The
|
||||
|
@ -603,13 +608,13 @@ new keyword and so is not a valid variable name in this tag.
|
|||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
``LazyObject`` is an undocumented-but-often-used utility class used for lazily
|
||||
wrapping other objects of unknown type.
|
||||
wrapping other objects of unknown type.
|
||||
|
||||
In Django 1.1 and earlier, it handled introspection in a non-standard way,
|
||||
depending on wrapped objects implementing a public method named
|
||||
``get_all_members()``. Since this could easily lead to name clashes, it has been
|
||||
changed to use the standard Python introspection method, involving
|
||||
``__members__`` and ``__dir__()``.
|
||||
``__members__`` and ``__dir__()``.
|
||||
|
||||
If you used ``LazyObject`` in your own code
|
||||
and implemented the ``get_all_members()`` method for wrapped objects, you'll need
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue