Improved Query join promotion logic

There were multiple cases where join promotion was a bit too aggressive.
This resulted in using outer joins where not necessary.

Refs #21150.
This commit is contained in:
Anssi Kääriäinen 2013-09-24 19:37:55 +03:00
parent ed0d720b78
commit ecaba36028
4 changed files with 136 additions and 52 deletions

View File

@ -901,15 +901,15 @@ class Query(object):
# Not all tables need to be joined to anything. No join type
# means the later columns are ignored.
join_type = None
elif outer_if_first or self.alias_map[lhs].join_type == self.LOUTER:
# We need to use LOUTER join if asked by outer_if_first or if the
# LHS table is left-joined in the query.
elif self.alias_map[lhs].join_type == self.LOUTER:
join_type = self.LOUTER
else:
join_type = self.INNER
join = JoinInfo(table, alias, join_type, lhs, join_cols or ((None, None),), nullable,
join_field)
self.alias_map[alias] = join
if outer_if_first:
self.promote_joins([alias])
if connection in self.join_map:
self.join_map[connection] += (alias,)
else:
@ -1004,17 +1004,14 @@ class Query(object):
# - this is an annotation over a model field
# then we need to explore the joins that are required.
# Join promotion note - we must not remove any rows here, so use
# outer join if there isn't any existing join.
field, sources, opts, join_list, path = self.setup_joins(
field_list, opts, self.get_initial_alias())
field_list, opts, self.get_initial_alias(), outer_if_first=True)
# Process the join chain to see if it can be trimmed
targets, _, join_list = self.trim_joins(sources, join_list, path)
# If the aggregate references a model or field that requires a join,
# those joins must be LEFT OUTER - empty join rows must be returned
# in order for zeros to be returned for those aggregates.
self.promote_joins(join_list)
col = targets[0].column
source = sources[0]
col = (join_list[-1], col)
@ -1089,8 +1086,69 @@ class Query(object):
break
return lookup_type, lookup_parts
def promote_filter_joins(self, join_list, can_reuse, lookup_type, value,
current_negated, connector):
# If the comparison is against NULL, we may need to use some left
# outer joins when creating the join chain.
#
# The logic here is that every isnull lookup in non-negated case is
# promoted when the connector is OR. In the AND case we do this only
# for first creation of the join. Join demotion happens reverse to
# this - demote always in AND case, first use only in OR case.
#
# In the OR case, a null row for the join can yield results for isnull
# lookup. But in the AND case that can't happen (assuming the other
# joins require non-null values) - if the join produces null row, then
# the ANDed condition that requires non-null value will not match, and
# hence the whole condition will not match.
#
# Consider case: (a__something & a__isnull=True)
#
# If a is null here, then a__something can't match anything (unless
# it also requires outer join), and thus the join doesn't need to be
# promoted by a__isnull.
#
# The connector isn't the only condition for removing join promotion.
# The already created joins also play a role here. Above, in the
# AND case, we don't want to promote the isnull lookup. But if we have
# only (a__isnull), then we must promote it. To see if a join needs
# to be promoted we use the seen joins inside this filter clause. That
# is contained in can_reuse - those are actually joins that have been
# built by this filter clause.
#
# Similar reasoning applies for join demotion, exception we demote
# joins in the AND case always, and never demote them in the OR case.
#
# Some examples: (a__name__isnull=True | a__type=1)
# When a__name__isnull is seen it is promoted (it is first creation of
# that join). a__type will not demote the join as it isn't first
# "a" join in the filter condition, and this is ORed query.
# (a__name__isnull=True & a__type=1)
# Here again a__name__isnull will create an outer join, but now a__type
# will demote the join back to inner join as the connector is AND.
# (a__type=1 & a__name__isnull=True)
# a__type will create inner join, a__name__isnull will not promote it
# to outer join as this is AND case and this isn't first use of the
# join. For completeness:
# (a__type=1 | a__name__isnull=True)
# The join for a__type is created as inner join. The join is promoted
# by a__name__isnull (ORed query => always promote isnull=True joins)
if lookup_type == 'isnull' and value is True and not current_negated:
promotable_joins = join_list if connector == OR else ()
if connector == AND and can_reuse is not None:
promotable_joins = (j for j in join_list if j not in can_reuse)
self.promote_joins(promotable_joins)
else:
demotable_joins = () if connector == OR else set(join_list)
if connector == OR and can_reuse is not None:
demotable_joins = set(j for j in join_list if j not in can_reuse)
for j in join_list:
if self.alias_map[j].join_type == self.LOUTER and j in demotable_joins:
self.alias_map[j] = self.alias_map[j]._replace(join_type=self.INNER)
def build_filter(self, filter_expr, branch_negated=False, current_negated=False,
can_reuse=None):
can_reuse=None, connector=AND):
"""
Builds a WhereNode for a single filter clause, but doesn't add it
to this Query. Query.add_q() will then add this filter to the where
@ -1139,18 +1197,14 @@ class Query(object):
try:
field, sources, opts, join_list, path = self.setup_joins(
parts, opts, alias, can_reuse, allow_many,)
if can_reuse is not None:
can_reuse.update(join_list)
except MultiJoin as e:
return self.split_exclude(filter_expr, LOOKUP_SEP.join(parts[:e.level]),
can_reuse, e.names_with_path)
if (lookup_type == 'isnull' and value is True and not current_negated and
len(join_list) > 1):
# If the comparison is against NULL, we may need to use some left
# outer joins when creating the join chain. This is only done when
# needed, as it's less efficient at the database level.
self.promote_joins(join_list)
self.promote_filter_joins(join_list, can_reuse, lookup_type, value,
current_negated, connector)
if can_reuse is not None:
can_reuse.update(join_list)
# Process the join list to see if we can remove any inner joins from
# the far end (fewer tables in a query is better). Note that join
@ -1182,7 +1236,7 @@ class Query(object):
return clause
def add_filter(self, filter_clause):
self.where.add(self.build_filter(filter_clause), 'AND')
self.where.add(self.build_filter(filter_clause, can_reuse=self.used_aliases), 'AND')
def need_having(self, obj):
"""
@ -1237,14 +1291,11 @@ class Query(object):
else:
where_part, having_parts = self.split_having_parts(
q_object.clone(), q_object.negated)
used_aliases = self.used_aliases
clause = self._add_q(where_part, used_aliases)
clause = self._add_q(where_part, self.used_aliases)
self.where.add(clause, AND)
for hp in having_parts:
clause = self._add_q(hp, used_aliases)
clause = self._add_q(hp, self.used_aliases)
self.having.add(clause, AND)
if self.filter_is_sticky:
self.used_aliases = used_aliases
def _add_q(self, q_object, used_aliases, branch_negated=False,
current_negated=False):
@ -1272,7 +1323,7 @@ class Query(object):
else:
child_clause = self.build_filter(
child, can_reuse=used_aliases, branch_negated=branch_negated,
current_negated=current_negated)
current_negated=current_negated, connector=connector)
target_clause.add(child_clause, connector)
if connector == OR:
used = alias_diff(refcounts_before, self.alias_refcount)
@ -1445,7 +1496,7 @@ class Query(object):
"""
# Generate the inner query.
query = Query(self.model)
query.where.add(query.build_filter(filter_expr), AND)
query.add_filter(filter_expr)
query.clear_ordering(True)
# Try to have as simple as possible subquery -> trim leading joins from
# the subquery.
@ -1553,15 +1604,12 @@ class Query(object):
try:
for name in field_names:
# Join promotion note - we must not remove any rows here, so
# if there is no existing joins, use outer join.
field, targets, u2, joins, path = self.setup_joins(
name.split(LOOKUP_SEP), opts, alias, None, allow_m2m,
True)
# Trim last join if possible
targets, final_alias, remaining_joins = self.trim_joins(targets, joins[-2:], path)
joins = joins[:-2] + remaining_joins
self.promote_joins(joins[1:])
name.split(LOOKUP_SEP), opts, alias, can_reuse=None,
allow_many=allow_m2m, outer_if_first=True)
targets, final_alias, joins = self.trim_joins(targets, joins, path)
for target in targets:
self.select.append(SelectInfo((final_alias, target.column), target))
except MultiJoin:

View File

@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ class HardbackBook(Book):
# Models for ticket #21150
class Alfa(models.Model):
pass
name = models.CharField(max_length=10, null=True)
class Bravo(models.Model):
pass

View File

@ -12,9 +12,8 @@ from django.test import TestCase, skipUnlessDBFeature
from django.test.utils import Approximate
from django.utils import six
from .models import (
Author, Book, Publisher, Clues, Entries, HardbackBook, ItemTag,
WithManualPK, Alfa, Bravo, Charlie)
from .models import (Author, Book, Publisher, Clues, Entries, HardbackBook,
ItemTag, WithManualPK, Alfa, Bravo, Charlie)
class AggregationTests(TestCase):
@ -1137,6 +1136,8 @@ class AggregationTests(TestCase):
'select__avg': Approximate(1.666, places=2),
})
class JoinPromotionTests(TestCase):
def test_ticket_21150(self):
b = Bravo.objects.create()
c = Charlie.objects.create(bravo=b)
@ -1152,3 +1153,19 @@ class AggregationTests(TestCase):
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
qs, [c], lambda x: x)
self.assertEqual(qs[0].alfa, a)
def test_existing_join_not_promoted(self):
# No promotion for existing joins
qs = Charlie.objects.filter(alfa__name__isnull=False).annotate(Count('alfa__name'))
self.assertTrue(' INNER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
# Also, the existing join is unpromoted when doing filtering for already
# promoted join.
qs = Charlie.objects.annotate(Count('alfa__name')).filter(alfa__name__isnull=False)
self.assertTrue(' INNER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
# But, as the join is nullable first use by annotate will be LOUTER
qs = Charlie.objects.annotate(Count('alfa__name'))
self.assertTrue(' LEFT OUTER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
def test_non_nullable_fk_not_promoted(self):
qs = Book.objects.annotate(Count('contact__name'))
self.assertTrue(' INNER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))

View File

@ -2689,6 +2689,15 @@ class NullJoinPromotionOrTest(TestCase):
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('INNER JOIN'), 1)
self.assertEqual(list(qs), [self.a2])
def test_null_join_demotion(self):
qs = ModelA.objects.filter(Q(b__name__isnull=False) & Q(b__name__isnull=True))
self.assertTrue(' INNER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
qs = ModelA.objects.filter(Q(b__name__isnull=True) & Q(b__name__isnull=False))
self.assertTrue(' INNER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
qs = ModelA.objects.filter(Q(b__name__isnull=False) | Q(b__name__isnull=True))
self.assertTrue(' LEFT OUTER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
qs = ModelA.objects.filter(Q(b__name__isnull=True) | Q(b__name__isnull=False))
self.assertTrue(' LEFT OUTER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
class ReverseJoinTrimmingTest(TestCase):
def test_reverse_trimming(self):
@ -2785,22 +2794,19 @@ class DisjunctionPromotionTests(TestCase):
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('INNER JOIN'), 1)
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('LEFT OUTER JOIN'), 1)
@unittest.expectedFailure
def test_disjunction_promotion3_failing(self):
# Now the ORed filter creates LOUTER join, but we do not have
# logic to unpromote it for the AND filter after it. The query
# results will be correct, but we have one LOUTER JOIN too much
# currently.
def test_disjunction_promotion3_demote(self):
# This one needs demotion logic: the first filter causes a to be
# outer joined, the second filter makes it inner join again.
qs = BaseA.objects.filter(
Q(a__f1='foo') | Q(b__f2='foo')).filter(a__f2='bar')
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('INNER JOIN'), 1)
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('LEFT OUTER JOIN'), 1)
@unittest.expectedFailure
def test_disjunction_promotion4_failing(self):
# Failure because no join repromotion
def test_disjunction_promotion4_demote(self):
qs = BaseA.objects.filter(Q(a=1) | Q(a=2))
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('JOIN'), 0)
# Demote needed for the "a" join. It is marked as outer join by
# above filter (even if it is trimmed away).
qs = qs.filter(a__f1='foo')
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('INNER JOIN'), 1)
@ -2810,9 +2816,8 @@ class DisjunctionPromotionTests(TestCase):
qs = qs.filter(Q(a=1) | Q(a=2))
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('INNER JOIN'), 1)
@unittest.expectedFailure
def test_disjunction_promotion5_failing(self):
# Failure because no join repromotion logic.
def test_disjunction_promotion5_demote(self):
# Failure because no join demotion logic for this case.
qs = BaseA.objects.filter(Q(a=1) | Q(a=2))
# Note that the above filters on a force the join to an
# inner join even if it is trimmed.
@ -2823,8 +2828,8 @@ class DisjunctionPromotionTests(TestCase):
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('LEFT OUTER JOIN'), 1)
qs = BaseA.objects.filter(Q(a__f1='foo') | Q(b__f1='foo'))
# Now the join to a is created as LOUTER
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('LEFT OUTER JOIN'), 0)
qs = qs.objects.filter(Q(a=1) | Q(a=2))
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('LEFT OUTER JOIN'), 2)
qs = qs.filter(Q(a=1) | Q(a=2))
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('INNER JOIN'), 1)
self.assertEqual(str(qs.query).count('LEFT OUTER JOIN'), 1)
@ -3079,3 +3084,17 @@ class Ticket21203Tests(TestCase):
qs = Ticket21203Child.objects.select_related('parent').defer('parent__created')
self.assertQuerysetEqual(qs, [c], lambda x: x)
self.assertIs(qs[0].parent.parent_bool, True)
class ValuesJoinPromotionTests(TestCase):
def test_values_no_promotion_for_existing(self):
qs = Node.objects.filter(parent__parent__isnull=False)
self.assertTrue(' INNER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
qs = qs.values('parent__parent__id')
self.assertTrue(' INNER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
# Make sure there is a left outer join without the filter.
qs = Node.objects.values('parent__parent__id')
self.assertTrue(' LEFT OUTER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))
def test_non_nullable_fk_not_promoted(self):
qs = ObjectB.objects.values('objecta__name')
self.assertTrue(' INNER JOIN ' in str(qs.query))