that happens with MySQL when a "GROUP BY" clause is included. This is a
backend-specific operation, so any other databases requiring similar
encouragement can have a function added to their own backend code.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9637 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
backend.
This allows Querysets to be cached for Oracle and should provide a model for
adding pickling support to other (external) database backends that need a
custom Query class.
Thanks to Justin Bronn for some assistance with this patch.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9272 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
again later (order_by('foo')). Or, at least, it can now. Thanks to Ilya
Novoselov for diagnosing the problem here.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9206 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Any extra(select=...) columns can be ignored in the SQL for dates, since we are
only interested in extracting distinct date values. We were previously
including them by accident and it was generating incorrect SQL.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9091 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
"having" attributes, only the former was included in the resulting SQL, meaning
subclasses had to completely duplicate Query.as_sql() if they were using any
kind of grouping filtering on the results.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9007 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This was triggered by r8794, but was, in fact, fairly fragile before then. The
current fix is the correct way we should be doing this.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8898 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
sometimes also sharing aliases, instead of creating their own. This was
generating incorrect SQL.
No representative test for this fix yet because I haven't had time to write one
that fits in nicely with the test suite. But it works for the monstrous example
in #8790 and a bunch of other complex examples I've created locally. Will write
a test later.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8853 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
efficient than possible SQL in some odd cases (found via code inspection, not
any particular failing example).
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8831 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Yes, this really is a commit that fixes an oversight in a commit that fixed an
oversight. One day I'll get it right.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8829 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Also comes with approximately 67% less stupidity in the table joins for
filtering on generic relations.
Fixed#5937, hopefully for good, this time.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8644 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This isn't a complete solution to this class of problem, but it will do for
1.0, which only has generic relations as a multicolumn type. A more general
multicolumn solution will be available after that release.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8608 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
fields no longer creates duplicate copies of the join table(s). Basically, this
means filters on the join table (for ManyToManyField(through=...)) and complex
filters in the normal (non-through) case don't produce incorrect or duplicate
results.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8472 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Though some attempts and backwards-compatibility were made, speed trumped compatibility. Thus, as usual, check BackwardsIncompatibleChanges for the complete list of backwards-incompatible changes.
Thanks to Jeremy Dunck and Keith Busell for the bulk of the work; some ideas from Brian Herring's previous work (refs #4561) were incorporated.
Documentation is, sigh, still forthcoming.
Fixes#6814 and #3951 (with the new dispatch_uid argument to connect).
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8223 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
the prequisites are correctly initialised prior to using them. Only affects
Oracle and other db backends requiring resolve_columns() (e.g. MS SQL?)
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8112 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
match nothing). This allows for some more straightforward code in the admin
interface.
Fixed#7488 (all the debugging there was done by Brian Rosner, who narrowed it
down to the item in this patch).
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8061 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Based on a patch from Justin Bronn.
The test in this patch most likely breaks on Oracle. That's another issue.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8053 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This removes some of the leaky abstraction problems (lifting WhereNode
internals into the Query class) from that commit and makes it possible for
extensions to WhereNode to have access to the field instances. It's also
backwards-compatible with pre-[7773] code, which is also better.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7835 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This avoids any use of "pk is not NULL" fragment, which behave inconsistently
in MySQL. Thanks to Russell Keith-Magee for diagnosing the problem and
suggesting the easy fix.
Refs #7076.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7812 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Also added a section to the documentation to indicate why it's probably not a
good idea to rely on this feature for complex stuff. Garbage in, garbage out
applies even to Django code.
Thanks to erik for the test case for this one.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7791 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
We no longer store any reference to Django field instances or models in the
Where node. This should improve cloning speed, fix some pickling difficulties,
reduce memory usage and remove some infinite loop possibilities in odd cases.
Slightly backwards incompatible if you're writing custom filters. See the
BackwardsIncompatibleChanges wiki page for details.
Fixed#7128, #7204, #7506.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7773 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
so that the ordering doesn't accidentally restrict the result set.
(Ironically, one existing test actually showed this problem, but I was too
dumb to notice the result was incorrect.)
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7761 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Avoids joining with the wrong tables when connecting select_related() tables to
the main query. This also leads to slightly more efficient (meaning less tables
are joined) SQL queries in some other cases, too. Some unnecessary tables are
now trimmed that were not previously.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7741 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Previously, if we were querying across a nullable join and then a non-nullable
one, the second join would not be a LEFT OUTER join, which would exclude
certain valid results from the result set.
This is the same problem as [7597] but for values() field specifications, so
this covers the second case where Django adds extra stuff to the select-clause.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7740 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
database level. Also worked around the fact that MySQL (and maybe other
backends we don't know about) cannot select from the table they're updating.
Fixed#7095.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7496 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
marked as erroneous. It's just more dangerous and risky, not forbidden. This
commit restores backwards compatibility there.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7490 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Malcolm Tredinnick
Ian Kelly
Russell Keith-Magee
Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Adrian Holovaty
Gary Wilson Jr