In cases where the same connection (from model A to model B along the
same field) was needed multiple times in a select_related query, the
join setup code mistakenly reused an existing join.
Cleaned up the internal implementation of m2m fields by removing
related.py _get_fk_val(). The _get_fk_val() was doing the wrong thing
if asked for the foreign key value on foreign key to parent model's
primary key when child model had different primary key field.
If LEFT JOINs are required for correct results, then trimming the join
can lead to incorrect results. Consider case:
TBL A: ID | TBL B: ID A_ID
1 1 1
2
Now A.order_by('b__a') did use a join to B, and B's a_id column. This
was seen to contain the same value as A's id, and so the join was
trimmed. But this wasn't correct as the join is LEFT JOIN, and for row
A.id = 2 the B.a_id column is NULL.
The bug was already fixed by 01b9c3d519,
so only tests added.
At the same time promote_joins()'s uncoditional flag is gone, it isn't
needed for anything any more.
All Promise objects were passed to force_text() deep in ORM query code.
Not only does this make it difficult or impossible for developers to
prevent or alter this behaviour, but it is also wrong for non-text
fields.
This commit changes `Field.get_prep_value()` from a no-op to one that
resolved Promise objects. All subclasses now call super() method first
to ensure that they have a real value to work with.
The code that tests to see which LIKE expressions to use now runs
using non-error-wrapped cursor, so cx_Oracle exceptions need to be caught
rather than Django DatabaseErrors.
Thanks Trac user ludo for report and initial patch.
It has been possible to use models of wrong type in related field
lookups. For example pigs__in=[a_duck] has worked. Changes to
ForeignObject broke that.
It might be a good idea to restrict the model types usable in lookups.
This should be done intentionally, not accidentally and without any
consideration for deprecation path.
Additionally this patch solves the orthogonal problem that specialized
`QuerySet` like `ValuesQuerySet` didn't inherit from the current `QuerySet`
type. This wasn't an issue until now because we didn't officially support
custom `QuerySet` but it became necessary with the introduction of this new
feature.
Thanks aaugustin, akaariai, carljm, charettes, mjtamlyn, shaib and timgraham
for the reviews.
In the combination of .values().aggregate() the aggregate_select_mask
didn't include the aggregates added. This resulted in bogus query.
Thanks to Trac alias debanshuk for report.
Anssi Kääriäinen
Tim Graham
Simon Charette
Harm Geerts
Loic Bistuer
Alex Cucu
Curtis Maloney
Alex Couper
Florian Hahn
Tai Lee
Shai Berger
Claude Paroz
Julien Phalip
ersran9
Karol Sikora
Alex Gaynor