The reason was that the except clause needed to remove a connection
from the django.db.connections dict, but other parts of Django do not
expect this to happen. In addition the except clause was silently
swallowing the exception messages.
Refs #19707, special thanks to Carl Meyer for pointing out that this
approach should be taken.
value_annotation isn't very well defined. Before this change, setting it
to datetime.datetime could silently reverse the behavior of isnull
lookups. This commit doesn't have any consequences on the current code.
It's just a safeguard for future ORM hackers.
Previously it was possible to call clear_ordering without the
force_empty argument. The result was that the query was still ordered
by model's meta ordering if that was defined. By making the arg
mandatory it will be easier to spot possible errors caused by assuming
clear_ordering will remove all ordering.
Thanks to Dylan Klomparens for the suggestion. Refs #19720.
When a query had a complex where condition (a condition targeting more
than the base table) a subquery was used for deletion. However, the
query had default ordering from the model's meta and Oracle doesn't
work with ordered subqueries.
The regression was caused by fast-path deletion code introduced in
1cd6e04cd4 for fixing #18676.
Thanks to Dylan Klomparens for the report.
This undocumented method was used in an old version of the admin, is
totally untested and hails from 2008. Although it's listed in the
"public methods" section, as it's not documented or used I don't think
it needs a deprecation path.
If we think it's useful I'll write some tests/docs for it instead...
Thanks a lot to everybody participating in developing this feature.
The patch was developed by multiple people, at least Trac aliases
tonnzor, jimmysong, Fandekasp and slurms.
Stylistic changes added by committer.
The class wasn't used anywhere except in RelatedObject.bind(), which
wasn't used anywhere. The class had one method defined as
NotImplemented, yet the class wasn't subclassed anywhere. In short, the
class was dead code.
In a normal relational construct, if you're listening for an event
that signals a child was deleted, you dont expect that the parent
was deleted already.
This change ensures that post_delete signals are fired immediately
after objects are deleted in the graph.
The original problem was that queryset cloning was really expensive
when filtering with F() clauses. The __deepcopy__ went too deep copying
_meta attributes of the models used. To fix this the use of
__deepcopy__ in qs cloning was removed.
This commit results in some speed improvements across the djangobench
benchmark suite. Most query_* tests are 20-30% faster, save() is 50%
faster and finally complex filtering situations can see 2x to order
of magnitude improvments.
Thanks to Suor, Alex and lrekucki for valuable feedback.
The guarantee that no queries will be made when accessing results is
done by new EmptyWhere class which is used for query.where and having.
Thanks to Simon Charette for reviewing and valuable suggestions.
When &'ing or |'ing querysets, wrong values could be cached, and crashes
could happen.
Thanks Marc Tamlyn for figuring out the problem and writing the patch.
The added promotion logic is based on promoting any joins used in only
some of the childs of an OR clause unless the join existed before the
OR clause addition.
The ORM didn't reuse joins for direct foreign key traversals when using
chained filters. For example:
qs.filter(fk__somefield=1).filter(fk__somefield=2))
produced two joins.
As a bonus, reverse onetoone filters can now reuse joins correctly
The regression was caused by the join() method refactor in commit
68847135bc
Thanks for Simon Charette for spotting some issues with the first draft
of the patch.
This is necessary because get_model() checks are case insensitive, and if the swapable check isn't, the
swappable logic gets tied up in knots with models that are partially swapped out.
Thanks to chris@cogdon.org for the report and extensive analysis, and Preston for his work on the draft patch.
Cleaned up the implementation of base convert_values() a little, and
made sure it accepts None as a value for numeric fields.
There are no tests attached. The reason is that not all of the
convert_values() accept None as a value for numeric fields (for example
sqlite3.convert_values()).
The reason the base convert_values() needs to accept None is that this
situation might arise in custom compilers for 3rd party backends. It
is easy to keep the convert_values() working, so lets do that.
Anssi Kääriäinen
Aymeric Augustin
Claude Paroz
Simon Charette
Tim Graham
Marc Tamlyn
Nick Sandford
Jani Tiainen
David Cramer
Alex Gaynor
mpaolini
Russell Keith-Magee