the prequisites are correctly initialised prior to using them. Only affects
Oracle and other db backends requiring resolve_columns() (e.g. MS SQL?)
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8112 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
match nothing). This allows for some more straightforward code in the admin
interface.
Fixed#7488 (all the debugging there was done by Brian Rosner, who narrowed it
down to the item in this patch).
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8061 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Based on a patch from Justin Bronn.
The test in this patch most likely breaks on Oracle. That's another issue.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@8053 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This removes some of the leaky abstraction problems (lifting WhereNode
internals into the Query class) from that commit and makes it possible for
extensions to WhereNode to have access to the field instances. It's also
backwards-compatible with pre-[7773] code, which is also better.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7835 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This avoids any use of "pk is not NULL" fragment, which behave inconsistently
in MySQL. Thanks to Russell Keith-Magee for diagnosing the problem and
suggesting the easy fix.
Refs #7076.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7812 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Also added a section to the documentation to indicate why it's probably not a
good idea to rely on this feature for complex stuff. Garbage in, garbage out
applies even to Django code.
Thanks to erik for the test case for this one.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7791 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
We no longer store any reference to Django field instances or models in the
Where node. This should improve cloning speed, fix some pickling difficulties,
reduce memory usage and remove some infinite loop possibilities in odd cases.
Slightly backwards incompatible if you're writing custom filters. See the
BackwardsIncompatibleChanges wiki page for details.
Fixed#7128, #7204, #7506.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7773 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
so that the ordering doesn't accidentally restrict the result set.
(Ironically, one existing test actually showed this problem, but I was too
dumb to notice the result was incorrect.)
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7761 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Avoids joining with the wrong tables when connecting select_related() tables to
the main query. This also leads to slightly more efficient (meaning less tables
are joined) SQL queries in some other cases, too. Some unnecessary tables are
now trimmed that were not previously.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7741 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Previously, if we were querying across a nullable join and then a non-nullable
one, the second join would not be a LEFT OUTER join, which would exclude
certain valid results from the result set.
This is the same problem as [7597] but for values() field specifications, so
this covers the second case where Django adds extra stuff to the select-clause.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7740 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
database level. Also worked around the fact that MySQL (and maybe other
backends we don't know about) cannot select from the table they're updating.
Fixed#7095.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7496 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
marked as erroneous. It's just more dangerous and risky, not forbidden. This
commit restores backwards compatibility there.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7490 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Malcolm Tredinnick
Adrian Holovaty
Gary Wilson Jr
Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Ian Kelly