innov
/
django1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Projects Releases Wiki Activity
django1/docs/contributing.txt

655 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

======================
Contributing to Django
======================
If you think working *with* Django is fun, wait until you start working *on* it.
We're passionate about helping Django users make the jump to contributing members
of the community, so there are many ways you can help Django's development:
* Blog about Django. We syndicate all the Django blogs we know about on
the `community page`_; contact jacob@jacobian.org if you've got a blog
you'd like to see on that page.
* Report bugs and request features in our `ticket tracker`_. Please read
`Reporting bugs`_, below, for the details on how we like our bug reports
served up.
* Submit patches for new and/or fixed behavior. Please read `Submitting
patches`_, below, for details on how to submit a patch.
* Join the `django-developers`_ mailing list and share your ideas for how
to improve Django. We're always open to suggestions, although we're
likely to be skeptical of large-scale suggestions without some code to
back it up.
* Triage patches that have been submitted by other users. Please read
`Ticket triage`_ below, for details on the triage process.
That's all you need to know if you'd like to join the Django development
community. The rest of this document describes the details of how our community
works and how it handles bugs, mailing lists, and all the other minutiae of
Django development.
Reporting bugs
==============
Well-written bug reports are *incredibly* helpful. However, there's a certain
amount of overhead involved in working with any bug tracking system, so your
help in keeping our ticket tracker as useful as possible is appreciated. In
particular:
* **Do** read the FAQ_ to see if your issue might be a well-known question.
* **Do** `search the tracker`_ to see if your issue has already been filed.
* **Do** ask on `django-users`_ *first* if you're not sure if what you're
seeing is a bug.
* **Do** write complete, reproducible, specific bug reports. Include as
much information as you possibly can, complete with code snippets, test
cases, etc. This means including a clear, concise description of the
problem, and a clear set of instructions for replicating the problem.
A minimal example that illustrates the bug in a nice small test case
is the best possible bug report.
* **Don't** use the ticket system to ask support questions. Use the
`django-users`_ list, or the `#django`_ IRC channel for that.
* **Don't** use the ticket system to make large-scale feature requests.
We like to discuss any big changes to Django's core on the `django-developers`_
list before actually working on them.
* **Don't** reopen issues that have been marked "wontfix". This mark means
that the decision has been made that we can't or won't fix this particular
issue. If you're not sure why, please ask on `django-developers`_.
* **Don't** use the ticket tracker for lengthy discussions, because they're
likely to get lost. If a particular ticket is controversial, please move
discussion to `django-developers`_.
Reporting security issues
=========================
Report security issues to security@djangoproject.com. This is a private list
only open to long-time, highly trusted Django developers, and its archives are
not publicly readable.
In the event of a confirmed vulnerability in Django itself, we will take the
following actions:
* Acknowledge to the reporter that we've received the report and that a fix
is forthcoming. We'll give a rough timeline and ask the reporter to keep
the issue confidential until we announce it.
* Halt all other development as long as is needed to develop a fix, including
patches against the current and two previous releases.
* Determine a go-public date for announcing the vulnerability and the fix.
To try to mitigate a possible "arms race" between those applying the patch
and those trying to exploit the hole, we will not announce security
problems immediately.
* Pre-notify everyone we know to be running the affected version(s) of
Django. We will send these notifications through private e-mail which will
include documentation of the vulnerability, links to the relevant patch(es),
and a request to keep the vulnerability confidential until the official
go-public date.
* Publicly announce the vulnerability and the fix on the pre-determined
go-public date. This will probably mean a new release of Django, but
in some cases it may simply be patches against current releases.
Submitting patches
==================
We're always grateful for patches to Django's code. Indeed, bug reports with
associated patches will get fixed *far* more quickly than those without patches.
Patch style
-----------
* Make sure your code matches our `coding style`_.
* Submit patches in the format returned by the ``svn diff`` command.
An exception is for code changes that are described more clearly in plain
English than in code. Indentation is the most common example; it's hard to
read patches when the only difference in code is that it's indented.
* Attach patches to a ticket in the `ticket tracker`_, using the "attach file"
button. Please *don't* put the patch in the ticket description or comment
unless it's a single line patch.
* Name the patch file with a ``.diff`` extension; this will let the ticket
tracker apply correct syntax highlighting, which is quite helpful.
* Check the "Has patch" box on the ticket details. This will make it
obvious that the ticket includes a patch, and it will add the ticket to
the `list of tickets with patches`_.
* The code required to fix a problem or add a feature is an essential part
of a patch, but it is not the only part. A good patch should also include
a regression test to validate the behavior that has been fixed (and prevent
the problem from arising again).
* If the code associated with a patch adds a new feature, or modifies behavior
of an existing feature, the patch should also contain documentation.
Non-trivial patches
-------------------
A "non-trivial" patch is one that is more than a simple bug fix. It's a patch
that introduces Django functionality and makes some sort of design decision.
If you provide a non-trivial patch, include evidence that alternatives have
been discussed on `django-developers`_. If you're not sure whether your patch
should be considered non-trivial, just ask.
Ticket triage
=============
Unfortunately, not all bug reports in the `ticket tracker`_ provide all
the `required details`_. A number of tickets have patches, but those patches
don't meet all the requirements of a `good patch`_.
One way to help out is to *triage* bugs that have been reported by other
users. A couple of dedicated volunteers work on this regularly, but more help
is always appreciated.
Most of the workflow is based around the concept of a ticket's "triage stage".
This stage describes where in its lifetime a given ticket is at any time.
Along with a handful of flags, this field easily tells us what and who each
ticket is waiting on.
Since a picture is worth a thousand words, let's start there:
.. image:: http://media.djangoproject.com/img/doc/djangotickets.png
:height: 451
:width: 590
:alt: Django's ticket workflow
We've got two roles here:
* Core developers: people with commit access who make the decisions and
write the bulk of the code.
* Ticket triagers: community members who keep track of tickets, making
sure the tickets are always categorized correctly.
Second, note the four triage stages:
1. A ticket starts as "Unreviewed", meaning that a triager has yet to
examine the ticket and move it along.
2. "Design decision needed" means "this concept requires a design
decision," which should be discussed either in the ticket comments or on
django-developers.
3. Once a ticket is ruled to be approved for fixing, it's moved into the
"Accepted" stage. This stage is where all the real work gets done.
4. If a ticket has an associated patch (see below), a triager will review the
patch. If the patch is complete, it'll be marked as "ready for checkin" so
that a core developer knows to review and check in the patches.
The second part of this workflow involves a set of flags the describe what the
ticket has or needs in order to be "ready for checkin":
"Has patch"
This means the ticket has an associated patch_. These will be
reviewed to see if the patch is "good".
"Needs documentation"
This flag is used for tickets with patches that need associated
documentation. Complete documentation of features is a prerequisite
before we can check a fix into the codebase.
"Needs tests"
This flags the patch as needing associated unit tests. Again, this is a
required part of a valid patch.
"Patch needs improvement"
This flag means that although the ticket *has* a patch, it's not quite
ready for checkin. This could mean the patch no longer applies
cleanly, or that the code doesn't live up to our standards.
A ticket can be resolved in a number of ways:
"fixed"
Used by one of the core developers once a patch has been rolled into
Django and the issue is fixed.
"invalid"
Used if the ticket is found to be incorrect or a user error.
"wontfix"
Used when a core developer decides that this request is not
appropriate for consideration in Django. This is usually chosen after
discussion in the ``django-developers`` mailing list, and you should
feel free to join in when it's something you care about.
"duplicate"
Used when another ticket covers the same issue. By closing duplicate
tickets, we keep all the discussion in one place, which helps everyone.
"worksforme"
Used when the triage team is unable to replicate the original bug.
If you believe that the ticket was closed in error -- because you're
still having the issue, or it's popped up somewhere else, or the triagers have
-- made a mistake, please reopen the ticket and tell us why. Please do not
reopen tickets that have been marked as "wontfix" by core developers.
.. _required details: `Reporting bugs`_
.. _good patch: `Patch style`_
.. _patch: `Submitting patches`_
Submitting and maintaining translations
=======================================
Various parts of Django, such as the admin site and validator error messages,
are internationalized. This means they display different text depending on a
user's language setting.
These translations are contributed by Django users worldwide. If you find an
incorrect translation, or if you'd like to add a language that isn't yet
translated, here's what to do:
* Join the `Django i18n mailing list`_ and introduce yourself.
* Create and submit translations using the methods described in the
`i18n documentation`_.
.. _Django i18n mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/django-i18n/
.. _i18n documentation: ../i18n/
Coding style
============
Please follow these coding standards when writing code for inclusion in Django:
* Unless otherwise specified, follow `PEP 8`_.
* Use four spaces for indentation.
* Use underscores, not camelCase, for variable, function and method names
(i.e. ``poll.get_unique_voters()``, not ``poll.getUniqueVoters``).
* Use ``InitialCaps`` for class names (or for factory functions that
return classes).
* Mark all strings for internationalization; see the `i18n documentation`_
for details.
* In Django template code, put one (and only one) space between the curly
brackets and the tag contents.
Do this::
{{ foo }}
Don't do this::
{{foo}}
* In Django views, the first parameter in a view function should be called
``request``.
Do this::
def my_view(request, foo):
# ...
Don't do this::
def my_view(req, foo):
# ...
* Please don't put your name in the code you contribute. Our policy is to
keep contributors' names in the ``AUTHORS`` file distributed with Django
-- not scattered throughout the codebase itself. Feel free to include a
change to the ``AUTHORS`` file in your patch if you make more than a
single trivial change.
Committing code
===============
Please follow these guidelines when committing code to Django's Subversion
repository:
* For any medium-to-big changes, where "medium-to-big" is according to your
judgment, please bring things up on the `django-developers`_ mailing list
before making the change.
If you bring something up on `django-developers`_ and nobody responds,
please don't take that to mean your idea is great and should be
implemented immediately because nobody contested it. Django's lead
developers don't have a lot of time to read mailing-list discussions
immediately, so you may have to wait a couple of days before getting a
response.
* Write detailed commit messages in the past tense, not present tense.
* Good: "Fixed Unicode bug in RSS API."
* Bad: "Fixes Unicode bug in RSS API."
* Bad: "Fixing Unicode bug in RSS API."
* For commits to a branch, prefix the commit message with the branch name.
For example: "magic-removal: Added support for mind reading."
* Limit commits to the most granular change that makes sense. This means,
use frequent small commits rather than infrequent large commits. For
example, if implementing feature X requires a small change to library Y,
first commit the change to library Y, then commit feature X in a separate
commit. This goes a *long way* in helping all core Django developers
follow your changes.
* If your commit closes a ticket in the Django `ticket tracker`_, begin
your commit message with the text "Fixed #abc", where "abc" is the number
of the ticket your commit fixes. Example: "Fixed #123 -- Added support
for foo". We've rigged Subversion and Trac so that any commit message
in that format will automatically close the referenced ticket and post a
comment to it with the full commit message.
If your commit closes a ticket and is in a branch, use the branch name
first, then the "Fixed #abc." For example:
"magic-removal: Fixed #123 -- Added whizbang feature."
For the curious: We're using a `Trac post-commit hook`_ for this.
.. _Trac post-commit hook: http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/contrib/trac-post-commit-hook
* If your commit references a ticket in the Django `ticket tracker`_ but
does *not* close the ticket, include the phrase "Refs #abc", where "abc"
is the number of the ticket your commit references. We've rigged
Subversion and Trac so that any commit message in that format will
automatically post a comment to the appropriate ticket.
Unit tests
==========
Django comes with a test suite of its own, in the ``tests`` directory of the
Django tarball. It's our policy to make sure all tests pass at all times.
The tests cover:
* Models and the database API (``tests/modeltests/``).
* The cache system (``tests/regressiontests/cache.py``).
* The ``django.utils.dateformat`` module (``tests/regressiontests/dateformat/``).
* Database typecasts (``tests/regressiontests/db_typecasts/``).
* The template system (``tests/regressiontests/templates/`` and
``tests/regressiontests/defaultfilters/``).
* ``QueryDict`` objects (``tests/regressiontests/httpwrappers/``).
* Markup template tags (``tests/regressiontests/markup/``).
We appreciate any and all contributions to the test suite!
The Django tests all use the testing infrastructure that ships with Django for
testing applications. See `Testing Django applications`_ for an explanation of
how to write new tests.
.. _Testing Django applications: ../testing/
Running the unit tests
----------------------
To run the tests, ``cd`` to the ``tests/`` directory and type::
./runtests.py --settings=path.to.django.settings
Yes, the unit tests need a settings module, but only for database connection
info -- the ``DATABASE_ENGINE``, ``DATABASE_USER`` and ``DATABASE_PASSWORD``.
You will also need a ``ROOT_URLCONF`` setting (its value is ignored; it just
needs to be present) and a ``SITE_ID`` setting (any integer value will do) in
order for all the tests to pass.
The unit tests will not touch your existing databases; they create a new
database, called ``django_test_db``, which is deleted when the tests are
finished. This means your user account needs permission to execute ``CREATE
DATABASE``.
Requesting features
===================
We're always trying to make Django better, and your feature requests are a key
part of that. Here are some tips on how to most effectively make a request:
* Request the feature on `django-developers`_, not in the ticket tracker;
it'll get read more closely if it's on the mailing list.
* Describe clearly and concisely what the missing feature is and how you'd
like to see it implemented. Include example code (non-functional is OK)
if possible.
* Explain *why* you'd like the feature. In some cases this is obvious, but
since Django is designed to help real developers get real work done,
you'll need to explain it, if it isn't obvious why the feature would be
useful.
As with most open-source projects, code talks. If you are willing to write the
code for the feature yourself or if (even better) you've already written it,
it's much more likely to be accepted. If it's a large feature that might need
multiple developers we're always happy to give you an experimental branch in
our repository; see below.
Branch policy
=============
In general, most development is confined to the trunk, and the trunk
is kept stable. People should be able to run production sites against the
trunk at any time.
Thus, large architectural changes -- that is, changes too large to be
encapsulated in a single patch, or changes that need multiple eyes on them --
will have dedicated branches. See, for example, the `i18n branch`_. If you
have a change of this nature that you'd like to work on, ask on
`django-developers`_ for a branch to be created for you. We'll create a branch
for pretty much any kind of experimenting you'd like to do.
We will only branch entire copies of the Django tree, even if work is only
happening on part of that tree. This makes it painless to switch to a branch.
Developers working on a branch should periodically merge changes from the trunk
into the branch. Please merge at least once a week. Every time you merge from
the trunk, note the merge and revision numbers in the commit message.
Once the branch is stable and ready to be merged into the trunk, alert
`django-developers`_.
After a branch has been merged, it should be considered "dead"; write access to
it will be disabled, and old branches will be periodically "trimmed." To keep
our SVN wrangling to a minimum, we won't be merging from a given branch into the
trunk more than once.
Using branches
--------------
To use a branch, you'll need to do two things:
* Get the branch's code through Subversion.
* Point your Python ``site-packages`` directory at the branch's version of
the ``django`` package rather than the version you already have
installed.
Getting the code from Subversion
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To get the latest version of a branch's code, check it out using Subversion::
svn co http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/branches/<branch>/
...where ``<branch>`` is the branch's name. See the `list of branch names`_.
Alternatively, you can automatically convert an existing directory of the
Django source code as long as you've checked it out via Subversion. To do the
conversion, execute this command from within your ``django`` directory::
svn switch http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/branches/<branch>/
The advantage of using ``svn switch`` instead of ``svn co`` is that the
``switch`` command retains any changes you might have made to your local copy
of the code. It attempts to merge those changes into the "switched" code. The
disadvantage is that it may cause conflicts with your local changes if the
"switched" code has altered the same lines of code.
(Note that if you use ``svn switch``, you don't need to point Python at the new
version, as explained in the next section.)
.. _list of branch names: http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/branches
Pointing Python at the new Django version
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Once you've retrieved the branch's code, you'll need to change your Python
``site-packages`` directory so that it points to the branch version of the
``django`` directory. (The ``site-packages`` directory is somewhere such as
``/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages`` or
``/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages`` or ``C:\Python\site-packages``.)
The simplest way to do this is by renaming the old ``django`` directory to
``django.OLD`` and moving the trunk version of the code into the directory
and calling it ``django``.
Alternatively, you can use a symlink called ``django`` that points to the
location of the branch's ``django`` package. If you want to switch back, just
change the symlink to point to the old code.
A third option is to use a `path file`_ (``<something>.pth``) which should
work on all systems (including Windows, which doesn't have symlinks
available). First, make sure there are no files, directories or symlinks named
``django`` in your ``site-packages`` directory. Then create a text file named
``django.pth`` and save it to your ``site-packages`` directory. That file
should contain a path to your copy of Django on a single line and optional
comments. Here is an example that points to multiple branches. Just uncomment
the line for the branch you want to use ('Trunk' in this example) and make
sure all other lines are commented::
# Trunk is a svn checkout of:
# http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk/
#
/path/to/trunk
# <branch> is a svn checkout of:
# http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/branches/<branch>/
#
#/path/to/<branch>
# On windows a path may look like this:
# C:/path/to/<branch>
If you're using Django 0.95 or earlier and installed it using
``python setup.py install``, you'll have a directory called something like
``Django-0.95-py2.4.egg`` instead of ``django``. In this case, edit the file
``setuptools.pth`` and remove the line that references the Django ``.egg``
file. Then copy the branch's version of the ``django`` directory into
``site-packages``.
.. _path file: http://docs.python.org/lib/module-site.html
Official releases
=================
Django's release numbering works as follows:
* Versions are numbered in the form ``A.B`` or ``A.B.C``.
* ``A`` is the major version number, which is only incremented for major
changes to Django, and these changes are not necessarily
backwards-compatible. That is, code you wrote for Django 6.0 may break
when we release Django 7.0.
* ``B`` is the minor version number, which is incremented for large yet
backwards compatible changes. Code written for Django 6.4 will continue
to work under Django 6.5.
A minor release may deprecate certain features in previous releases. If a
feature in version ``A.B`` is deprecated, it will continue to work in
version ``A.B+1``. In version ``A.B+2``, use of the feature will raise a
``PendingDeprecationWarning`` but will continue to work. Version
``A.B+3`` will remove the feature entirely. Major point releases will
always remove deprecated features immediately.
* ``C`` is the micro version number which, is incremented for bug and
security fixes. A new micro-release will always be 100%
backwards-compatible with the previous micro-release.
* In some cases, we'll make release candidate releases. These are of the
form ``A.BrcN``, which means the ``Nth`` candidate release of version
``A.B``.
An exception to this version numbering scheme is the pre-1.0 Django code.
There's no guarantee of backwards-compatibility until the 1.0 release.
In Subversion, each Django release will be tagged under `tags/releases`_. If
it's necessary to release a bug fix release or a security release that doesn't
come from the trunk, we'll copy that tag to ``branches/releases`` to make the
bug fix release.
Deciding on features
====================
Once a feature's been requested and discussed, eventually we'll have a decision
about whether to include the feature or drop it.
Whenever possible, we strive for a rough consensus. To that end, we'll often
have informal votes on `django-developers`_ about a feature. In these votes we
follow the voting style invented by Apache and used on Python itself, where
votes are given as +1, +0, -0, or -1. Roughly translated, these votes mean:
* +1: "I love the idea and I'm strongly committed to it."
* +0: "Sounds OK to me."
* -0: "I'm not thrilled, but I won't stand in the way."
* -1: "I strongly disagree and would be very unhappy to see the idea turn
into reality."
Although these votes on django-developers are informal, they'll be taken very
seriously. After a suitable voting period, if an obvious consensus arises
we'll follow the votes.
However, consensus is not always possible. Tough decisions will be discussed by
all full committers and finally decided by the Benevolent Dictators for Life,
Adrian and Jacob.
Commit access
=============
Django has two types of committers:
Full committers
These are people who have a long history of contributions to Django's
codebase, a solid track record of being polite and helpful on the mailing
lists, and a proven desire to dedicate serious time to Django's development.
The bar is very high for full commit access. It will only be granted by
unanimous approval of all existing full committers, and the decision will err
on the side of rejection.
Partial committers
These are people who are "domain experts." They have direct check-in access
to the subsystems that fall under their jurisdiction, and they're given a
formal vote in questions that involve their subsystems. This type of access
is likely to be given to someone who contributes a large subframework to
Django and wants to continue to maintain it.
Like full committers, partial commit access is by unanimous approval of all
full committers (and any other partial committers in the same area).
However, the bar is set lower; proven expertise in the area in question is
likely to be sufficient.
To request commit access, please contact an existing committer privately. Public
requests for commit access are potential flame-war starters, and will be ignored.
.. _community page: http://www.djangoproject.com/community/
.. _ticket tracker: http://code.djangoproject.com/newticket
.. _django-developers: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers
.. _FAQ: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/faq/
.. _search the tracker: http://code.djangoproject.com/search
.. _django-users: http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
.. _`#django`: irc://irc.freenode.net/django
.. _list of tickets with patches: http://code.djangoproject.com/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&has_patch=1&order=priority
.. _PEP 8: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html
.. _i18n branch: http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/branches/i18n
.. _`tags/releases`: http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/tags/releases
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink