full LL is always correct now, if slower. Stops prediction when resolvesToJustOneViableAlt(). SLL always uses heuristic
This commit is contained in:
parent
e7ece0e90a
commit
01bbce6952
|
@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ import org.antlr.v4.runtime.misc.Interval;
|
|||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.misc.IntervalSet;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.misc.NotNull;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.misc.Nullable;
|
||||
import org.stringtemplate.v4.misc.MultiMap;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
import java.util.Arrays;
|
||||
|
@ -268,9 +267,7 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
public static int retry_with_context_predicts_same_as_alt = 0;
|
||||
public static int retry_with_context_from_dfa = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/** A Map that uses just the state and the stack context as the key.
|
||||
* Used by needMoreLookaheadLL.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/** A Map that uses just the state and the stack context as the key. */
|
||||
class AltAndContextMap extends FlexibleHashMap<ATNConfig,BitSet> {
|
||||
/** Code is function of (s, _, ctx, _) */
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
|
@ -297,18 +294,7 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
@NotNull
|
||||
public final DFA[] decisionToDFA;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Do only local context prediction (SLL(k) style). */
|
||||
protected boolean SLL = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Tell the full LL prediction algorithm to pursue lookahead until
|
||||
* it has uniquely predicted alternative without conflict or it's
|
||||
* certain that it's found and ambiguous input sequence. For speed
|
||||
* reasons, we terminate the prediction process early when this
|
||||
* variable is false. When true, the prediction process will
|
||||
* continue looking for the exact ambiguous sequence even if
|
||||
* it has already figured out which alternative to predict.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
protected boolean exactAmbig = false;
|
||||
protected PredictionMode mode = PredictionMode.LL;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Each prediction operation uses a cache for merge of prediction contexts.
|
||||
* Don't keep around as it wastes huge amounts of memory. DoubleKeyMap
|
||||
|
@ -458,7 +444,7 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
loop:
|
||||
while ( true ) {
|
||||
if ( dfa_debug ) System.out.println("DFA state "+s.stateNumber+" LA(1)=="+getLookaheadName(input));
|
||||
if ( s.requiresFullContext && !SLL ) {
|
||||
if ( s.requiresFullContext && mode != PredictionMode.SLL ) {
|
||||
if ( dfa_debug ) System.out.println("ctx sensitive state "+outerContext+" in "+s);
|
||||
boolean fullCtx = true;
|
||||
ATNConfigSet s0_closure =
|
||||
|
@ -612,7 +598,6 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
|
||||
ATNConfigSet previous = s0.configs;
|
||||
DFAState previousD = s0;
|
||||
ATNConfigSet fullCtxSet;
|
||||
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("s0 = "+s0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -685,30 +670,29 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
// MORE THAN ONE VIABLE ALTERNATIVE
|
||||
if ( hasConflictingAltSet(altSubSets) && !hasStateAssociatedWithOneAlt(reach) ) {
|
||||
if ( hasSLLConflictTerminatingPrediction(reach) ) {
|
||||
D.configs.conflictingAlts = getConflictingAlts(reach);
|
||||
if ( outerContext == ParserRuleContext.EMPTY || // in grammar start rule
|
||||
!D.configs.dipsIntoOuterContext || // didn't fall out of rule
|
||||
SLL ) // forcing SLL only
|
||||
{
|
||||
// SPECIAL CASE WHERE SLL KNOWS CONFLICT IS AMBIGUITY
|
||||
if ( !D.configs.hasSemanticContext ) {
|
||||
reportAmbiguity(dfa, D, startIndex, input.index(),
|
||||
D.configs.conflictingAlts, D.configs);
|
||||
if ( mode == PredictionMode.SLL ) {
|
||||
// stop w/o failover for sure
|
||||
if ( outerContext == ParserRuleContext.EMPTY || // in grammar start rule
|
||||
!D.configs.dipsIntoOuterContext ) // didn't fall out of rule
|
||||
{
|
||||
// SPECIAL CASE WHERE SLL KNOWS CONFLICT IS AMBIGUITY
|
||||
if ( !D.configs.hasSemanticContext ) {
|
||||
reportAmbiguity(dfa, D, startIndex, input.index(),
|
||||
D.configs.conflictingAlts, D.configs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// always stop at D
|
||||
D.isAcceptState = true;
|
||||
D.prediction = D.configs.conflictingAlts.nextSetBit(0);
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("RESOLVED TO "+D.prediction+" for "+D);
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("SLL RESOLVED TO "+D.prediction+" for "+D);
|
||||
predictedAlt = D.prediction;
|
||||
// Falls through to check predicates below
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
// SLL CONFLICT; RETRY WITH FULL LL CONTEXT
|
||||
// (it's possible SLL with preds could resolve to single alt
|
||||
// which would mean we could avoid full LL, but not worth
|
||||
// code complexity.)
|
||||
// RETRY WITH FULL LL CONTEXT
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("RETRY with outerContext="+outerContext);
|
||||
// don't look up context in cache now since we're just creating state D
|
||||
ATNConfigSet s0_closure =
|
||||
computeStartState(dfa.atnStartState,
|
||||
outerContext,
|
||||
|
@ -831,15 +815,12 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
// System.out.println("altSubSets: "+altSubSets);
|
||||
reach.uniqueAlt = getUniqueAlt(altSubSets);
|
||||
if ( reach.uniqueAlt!=ATN.INVALID_ALT_NUMBER ) break;
|
||||
if ( exactAmbig ) {
|
||||
if ( mode == PredictionMode.LL_EXACT_AMBIG ) {
|
||||
if ( allSubsetsConflict(altSubSets) && allSubsetsEqual(altSubSets) ) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if ( (hasConflictingAltSet(altSubSets) &&
|
||||
!hasStateAssociatedWithOneAlt(reach)) ||
|
||||
resolvesToJustOneViableAlt(altSubSets) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
else if ( resolvesToJustOneViableAlt(altSubSets) ) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
previous = reach;
|
||||
|
@ -882,7 +863,7 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
// reportAmbiguity(dfa, D, startIndex, input.index(), getConflictingAlts(reach), reach);
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
if ( exactAmbig ) {
|
||||
if ( mode == PredictionMode.LL_EXACT_AMBIG ) {
|
||||
reportAmbiguity(dfa, D, startIndex, input.index(), getConflictingAlts(reach), reach);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1440,9 +1421,9 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
return false; # all sets conflict with len(viable_alts)>1, stop
|
||||
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public boolean needMoreLookaheadSLL(@NotNull ATNConfigSet configs) {
|
||||
public boolean hasSLLConflictTerminatingPrediction(@NotNull ATNConfigSet configs) {
|
||||
// pure SLL mode parsing
|
||||
if ( SLL ) {
|
||||
if ( mode == PredictionMode.SLL ) {
|
||||
if ( configs.hasSemanticContext ) {
|
||||
// dup configs, tossing out semantic predicates
|
||||
ATNConfigSet dup = new ATNConfigSet();
|
||||
|
@ -1452,15 +1433,15 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
}
|
||||
configs = dup;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// do usual full LL termination test
|
||||
return needMoreLookaheadLL(configs);
|
||||
// now we have combined contexts for configs with dissimilar preds
|
||||
}
|
||||
// combined SLL+LL mode parsing
|
||||
// System.out.println("SLL configs: "+configs);
|
||||
// map (s,_,x,_) -> altset for all configs
|
||||
|
||||
// pure SLL or combined SLL+LL mode parsing
|
||||
|
||||
Collection<BitSet> altsets = getConflictingAltSubsets(configs);
|
||||
// System.out.println("SLL altsets: "+altsets);
|
||||
return hasNonConflictingAltSet(altsets);
|
||||
boolean heuristic =
|
||||
hasConflictingAltSet(altsets) && !hasStateAssociatedWithOneAlt(configs);
|
||||
return heuristic;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean allSubsetsConflict(Collection<BitSet> altsets) {
|
||||
|
@ -1637,20 +1618,16 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
return false; # len(viable_alts)==1, stop
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public boolean needMoreLookaheadLL(@NotNull ATNConfigSet configs) {
|
||||
// System.out.println("configs: "+configs);
|
||||
// map (s,_,x,_) -> altset for all configs
|
||||
Collection<BitSet> altsets = getConflictingAltSubsets(configs);
|
||||
// System.out.println("altsets: "+altsets);
|
||||
BitSet viableAlts = new BitSet();
|
||||
for (BitSet alts : altsets) {
|
||||
int minAlt = alts.nextSetBit(0);
|
||||
viableAlts.set(minAlt);
|
||||
if ( viableAlts.cardinality()>1 ) { // more than 1 viable alt
|
||||
// System.out.println("go; viableAlts="+viableAlts);
|
||||
return true; // try using more lookahead
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// System.out.println("stop");
|
||||
return false; // len(viable_alts)==1, stop
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1712,33 +1689,29 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int n = 0;
|
||||
boolean[] viableAlts = new boolean[100];
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean hasMoreThanOneViableAlt2(Collection<BitSet> altsets) {
|
||||
n = 0;
|
||||
Arrays.fill(viableAlts, false);
|
||||
for (BitSet alts : altsets) {
|
||||
int minAlt = alts.nextSetBit(0);
|
||||
if ( !viableAlts[minAlt] ) n++;
|
||||
viableAlts[minAlt] = true;
|
||||
if ( n > 1 ) { // more than 1 viable alt
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public BitSet getConflictingAlts(ATNConfigSet configs) {
|
||||
Collection<BitSet> altsets = getConflictingAltSubsets(configs);
|
||||
return getAlts(altsets);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* From grammar:
|
||||
|
||||
s' : s s ;
|
||||
s : x? | x ;
|
||||
x : 'a' ;
|
||||
|
||||
config list: (4,1), (11,1,4), (7,1), (3,1,1), (4,1,1), (8,1,1), (7,1,1),
|
||||
(8,2), (11,2,8), (11,1,[8 1])
|
||||
|
||||
state to config list:
|
||||
|
||||
3 -> (3,1,1)
|
||||
4 -> (4,1), (4,1,1)
|
||||
7 -> (7,1), (7,1,1)
|
||||
8 -> (8,1,1), (8,2)
|
||||
11 -> (11,1,4), (11,2,8), (11,1,8 1)
|
||||
|
||||
Walk and find state config lists with > 1 alt. If none, no conflict.
|
||||
return null. Here, states 11 and 8 have lists with both alts 1 and 2.
|
||||
Must check these config lists for conflicting configs.
|
||||
|
||||
Sam pointed out a problem with the previous definition, v3, of
|
||||
ambiguous states. If we have another state associated with conflicting
|
||||
alternatives, we should keep going. For example, the following grammar
|
||||
|
@ -1773,118 +1746,8 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
looking for input reasonably, I don't declare the state done. We
|
||||
ignore a set of conflicting alts when we have an alternative
|
||||
that we still need to pursue.
|
||||
|
||||
So, in summary, as long as there is a single configuration that is
|
||||
not conflicting with any other configuration for that state, then
|
||||
there is more input we can use to keep going. E.g.,
|
||||
s->[(s,1,[x]), (s,2,[x]), (s,2,[y])]
|
||||
s->[(s,1,_)]
|
||||
s->[(s,1,[y]), (s,2,[x])]
|
||||
Regardless of what goes on for the other states, this is
|
||||
sufficient to force us to add this new state to the ATN-to-DFA work list.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: split into "has nonconflict config--add to work list" and getambigalts functions
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: now we know contexts are merged, can we optimize? Use big int -> config array?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
@Nullable
|
||||
public IntervalSet getConflictingAlts_old(@NotNull ATNConfigSet configs) {
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("### check ambiguous "+configs);
|
||||
// System.out.println("getConflictingAlts; set size="+configs.size());
|
||||
// First get a list of configurations for each state.
|
||||
// Most of the time, each state will have one associated configuration.
|
||||
MultiMap<Integer, ATNConfig> stateToConfigListMap = new MultiMap<Integer, ATNConfig>();
|
||||
Map<Integer, IntervalSet> stateToAltListMap = new HashMap<Integer, IntervalSet>();
|
||||
|
||||
for (ATNConfig c : configs) {
|
||||
stateToConfigListMap.map(c.state.stateNumber, c);
|
||||
IntervalSet alts = stateToAltListMap.get(c.state.stateNumber);
|
||||
if ( alts==null ) {
|
||||
alts = new IntervalSet();
|
||||
stateToAltListMap.put(c.state.stateNumber, alts);
|
||||
}
|
||||
alts.add(c.alt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// potential conflicts are states, s, with > 1 configurations and diff alts
|
||||
// find all alts with potential conflicts
|
||||
int numPotentialConflicts = 0;
|
||||
IntervalSet altsToIgnore = new IntervalSet();
|
||||
for (int state : stateToConfigListMap.keySet()) { // for each state
|
||||
IntervalSet alts = stateToAltListMap.get(state);
|
||||
if ( alts.size()==1 ) {
|
||||
if ( !atn.states.get(state).onlyHasEpsilonTransitions() ) {
|
||||
List<ATNConfig> configsPerState = stateToConfigListMap.get(state);
|
||||
ATNConfig anyConfig = configsPerState.get(0);
|
||||
altsToIgnore.add(anyConfig.alt);
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("### one alt and all non-ep: "+configsPerState);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// remove state's configurations from further checking; no issues with them.
|
||||
// (can't remove as it's concurrent modification; set to null)
|
||||
// return null;
|
||||
stateToConfigListMap.put(state, null);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
numPotentialConflicts++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("### altsToIgnore: "+altsToIgnore);
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("### stateToConfigListMap="+stateToConfigListMap);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( numPotentialConflicts==0 ) {
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// compare each pair of configs in sets for states with > 1 alt in config list, looking for
|
||||
// (s, i, ctx) and (s, j, ctx') where ctx==ctx' or one is suffix of the other.
|
||||
IntervalSet ambigAlts = new IntervalSet();
|
||||
for (int state : stateToConfigListMap.keySet()) {
|
||||
List<ATNConfig> configsPerState = stateToConfigListMap.get(state);
|
||||
if (configsPerState == null) continue;
|
||||
IntervalSet alts = stateToAltListMap.get(state);
|
||||
// Sam's correction to ambig def is here:
|
||||
if ( !altsToIgnore.isNil() && alts.and(altsToIgnore).size()<=1 ) {
|
||||
// System.err.println("ignoring alt since "+alts+"&"+altsToIgnore+
|
||||
// ".size is "+alts.and(altsToIgnore).size());
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
int size = configsPerState.size();
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
|
||||
ATNConfig c = configsPerState.get(i);
|
||||
for (int j = i+1; j < size; j++) {
|
||||
ATNConfig d = configsPerState.get(j);
|
||||
if ( c.alt != d.alt ) {
|
||||
boolean conflicting = c.context.equals(d.context);
|
||||
if ( conflicting ) {
|
||||
if ( debug ) {
|
||||
System.out.println("we reach state "+c.state.stateNumber+
|
||||
" in rule "+
|
||||
(parser !=null ? getRuleName(c.state.ruleIndex) :"n/a")+
|
||||
" alts "+c.alt+","+d.alt+" from ctx "+c.context.toString(parser)
|
||||
+" and "+ d.context.toString(parser));
|
||||
}
|
||||
ambigAlts.add(c.alt);
|
||||
ambigAlts.add(d.alt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("### ambigAlts="+ambigAlts);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( ambigAlts.isNil() ) return null;
|
||||
|
||||
// are any configs not represented in ambig alt sets
|
||||
// for (ATNConfig config : configs) {
|
||||
// if (!ambigAlts.contains(config.alt)) {
|
||||
// return null;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
return ambigAlts;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected BitSet getConflictingAltsOrUniqueAlt(ATNConfigSet configs) {
|
||||
BitSet conflictingAlts;
|
||||
if ( configs.uniqueAlt!= ATN.INVALID_ALT_NUMBER ) {
|
||||
|
@ -1897,27 +1760,6 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
return conflictingAlts;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// protected int resolveToMinAlt(@NotNull DFAState D, IntervalSet conflictingAlts) {
|
||||
// // kill dead alts so we don't chase them ever
|
||||
//// killAlts(conflictingAlts, D.configset);
|
||||
// D.prediction = conflictingAlts.getMinElement();
|
||||
// if ( debug ) System.out.println("RESOLVED TO "+D.prediction+" for "+D);
|
||||
// return D.prediction;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
protected int resolveNongreedyToExitBranch(@NotNull ATNConfigSet reach,
|
||||
@NotNull IntervalSet conflictingAlts)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// exit branch is alt 2 always; alt 1 is entry or loopback branch
|
||||
// since we're predicting, create DFA accept state for exit alt
|
||||
int exitAlt = 2;
|
||||
conflictingAlts.remove(exitAlt);
|
||||
// kill dead alts so we don't chase them ever
|
||||
// killAlts(conflictingAlts, reach);
|
||||
if ( debug ) System.out.println("RESOLVED TO "+reach);
|
||||
return exitAlt;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@NotNull
|
||||
public String getTokenName(int t) {
|
||||
if ( t==Token.EOF ) return "EOF";
|
||||
|
@ -2078,11 +1920,9 @@ public class ParserATNSimulator extends ATNSimulator {
|
|||
ambigAlts, configs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void setSLL(boolean SLL) {
|
||||
this.SLL = SLL;
|
||||
public void setPredictionMode(PredictionMode mode) {
|
||||
this.mode = mode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void setExactAmbig(boolean exactAmbig) {
|
||||
this.exactAmbig = exactAmbig;
|
||||
}
|
||||
public PredictionMode getPredictionMode() { return mode; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|||
package org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn;
|
||||
|
||||
public enum PredictionMode {
|
||||
/** Do only local context prediction (SLL(k) style) and using
|
||||
* heuristic which almost always works but is much faster
|
||||
* than precise answer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SLL(1),
|
||||
|
||||
/** Full LL that always gets right answer */
|
||||
LL(2),
|
||||
|
||||
/** Tell the full LL prediction algorithm to pursue lookahead until
|
||||
* it has uniquely predicted alternative without conflict or it's
|
||||
* certain that it's found and ambiguous input sequence. For speed
|
||||
* reasons, we terminate the prediction process early when this
|
||||
* variable is false. When true, the prediction process will
|
||||
* continue looking for the exact ambiguous sequence even if
|
||||
* it has already figured out which alternative to predict.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
LL_EXACT_AMBIG(4);
|
||||
int v;
|
||||
|
||||
private PredictionMode(int v) {
|
||||
this.v = v;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ import org.antlr.v4.runtime.Parser;
|
|||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.ParserRuleContext;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.Token;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.TokenStream;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.PredictionMode;
|
||||
|
||||
import javax.print.PrintException;
|
||||
import java.io.FileInputStream;
|
||||
|
@ -224,7 +225,7 @@ public class TestRig {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ( SLL ) {
|
||||
parser.getInterpreter().setSLL(true);
|
||||
parser.getInterpreter().setPredictionMode(PredictionMode.SLL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
parser.setTokenStream(tokens);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import org.antlr.v4.runtime.ParserRuleContext;
|
|||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.Token;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.LexerATNSimulator;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.ParserATNSimulator;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.PredictionMode;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.io.File;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ class TestJava {
|
|||
parser.setTokenStream(tokens);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( diag ) parser.addErrorListener(new DiagnosticErrorListener());
|
||||
if ( SLL ) parser.getInterpreter().setSLL(true);
|
||||
if ( SLL ) parser.getInterpreter().setPredictionMode(PredictionMode.SLL);
|
||||
// start parsing at the compilationUnit rule
|
||||
ParserRuleContext<Token> tree = parser.compilationUnit();
|
||||
if ( showTree ) tree.inspect(parser);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ import org.antlr.v4.runtime.ParserRuleContext;
|
|||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.Token;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.LexerATNSimulator;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.ParserATNSimulator;
|
||||
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.PredictionMode;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.io.File;
|
||||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
|
@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ class TestJavaLR {
|
|||
JavaLRParser parser = new JavaLRParser(tokens);
|
||||
if ( diag ) parser.addErrorListener(new DiagnosticErrorListener());
|
||||
if ( bail ) parser.setErrorHandler(new BailErrorStrategy());
|
||||
if ( SLL ) parser.getInterpreter().setSLL(true);
|
||||
if ( SLL ) parser.getInterpreter().setPredictionMode(PredictionMode.SLL);
|
||||
|
||||
// start parsing at the compilationUnit rule
|
||||
ParserRuleContext<Token> t = parser.compilationUnit();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue