Cleanup principles
I didn't really change much, just moved somes stuff around and expanded a little more in number 5. I moved all of the physical shipping container stuff to just the into because while its a cute analogy, repeating it over and over just got in the way of the real point - and by number 5 we endedup having more text about shipping containers than our containers - which was just weird. Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
294b77cdba
commit
4dfd127f04
|
@ -3,49 +3,44 @@
|
|||
Define a unit of software delivery called a Standard Container.
|
||||
The goal of a Standard Container is to encapsulate a software component and all its dependencies in a format that is self-describing and portable, so that any compliant runtime can run it without extra dependencies, regardless of the underlying machine and the contents of the container.
|
||||
|
||||
The specification for Standard Containers is straightforward.
|
||||
It mostly defines 1) a file format, 2) a set of standard operations, and 3) an execution environment.
|
||||
The specification for Standard Containers defines:
|
||||
|
||||
A great analogy for this is the shipping container.
|
||||
Just like how Standard Containers are a fundamental unit of software delivery, shipping containers are a fundamental unit of physical delivery.
|
||||
1. configuration file formats
|
||||
2. a set of standard operations
|
||||
3. an execution environment.
|
||||
|
||||
A great analogy for this is the physical shipping container used by the transportation industry.
|
||||
Shipping containers are a fundamental unit of delivery, they can be lifted, stacked, locked, loaded, unloaded and labelled.
|
||||
Irrespective of their contents, by standardizing the container itself it allowed for a consistent, more streamlined and efficient set of processes to be defined.
|
||||
For software Standard Containers offer similar functionality by being the fundamental, standardized, unit of delivery for a software package.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Standard operations
|
||||
|
||||
Just like shipping containers, Standard Containers define a set of STANDARD OPERATIONS.
|
||||
Shipping containers can be lifted, stacked, locked, loaded, unloaded and labelled.
|
||||
Similarly, Standard Containers can be created, started, and stopped using standard container tools (what this spec is about); copied and snapshotted using standard filesystem tools; and downloaded and uploaded using standard network tools.
|
||||
Standard Containers define a set of STANDARD OPERATIONS.
|
||||
They can be created, started, and stopped using standard container tools; copied and snapshotted using standard filesystem tools; and downloaded and uploaded using standard network tools.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Content-agnostic
|
||||
|
||||
Just like shipping containers, Standard Containers are CONTENT-AGNOSTIC: all standard operations have the same effect regardless of the contents.
|
||||
A shipping container will be stacked in exactly the same way whether it contains Vietnamese powder coffee or spare Maserati parts.
|
||||
Similarly, Standard Containers are started or uploaded in the same way whether they contain a postgres database, a php application with its dependencies and application server, or Java build artifacts.
|
||||
Standard Containers are CONTENT-AGNOSTIC: all standard operations have the same effect regardless of the contents.
|
||||
They are started in the same way whether they contain a postgres database, a php application with its dependencies and application server, or Java build artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Infrastructure-agnostic
|
||||
|
||||
Both types of containers are INFRASTRUCTURE-AGNOSTIC: they can be transported to thousands of facilities around the world, and manipulated by a wide variety of equipment.
|
||||
A shipping container can be packed in a factory in Ukraine, transported by truck to the nearest routing center, stacked onto a train, loaded into a German boat by an Australian-built crane, stored in a warehouse at a US facility, etc.
|
||||
Similarly, a standard container can be bundled on my laptop, uploaded to S3, downloaded, run and snapshotted by a build server at Equinix in Virginia, uploaded to 10 staging servers in a home-made Openstack cluster, then sent to 30 production instances across 3 EC2 regions.
|
||||
Standard Containers are INFRASTRUCTURE-AGNOSTIC: they can be run in any OCI supported infrastructure.
|
||||
For example, a standard container can be bundled on a laptop, uploaded to cloud storage, downloaded, run and snapshotted by a build server at a fiber hotel in Virginia, uploaded to 10 staging servers in a home-made private cloud cluster, then sent to 30 production instances across 3 public cloud regions.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Designed for automation
|
||||
|
||||
Because they offer the same standard operations regardless of content and infrastructure, Standard Containers, just like their physical counterparts, are extremely well-suited for automation.
|
||||
Standard Containers are DESIGNED FOR AUTOMATION: because they offer the same standard operations regardless of content and infrastructure, Standard Containers, are extremely well-suited for automation.
|
||||
In fact, you could say automation is their secret weapon.
|
||||
|
||||
Many things that once required time-consuming and error-prone human effort can now be programmed.
|
||||
Before shipping containers, a bag of powder coffee was hauled, dragged, dropped, rolled and stacked by 10 different people in 10 different locations by the time it reached its destination.
|
||||
1 out of 50 disappeared.
|
||||
1 out of 20 was damaged.
|
||||
The process was slow, inefficient and cost a fortune - and was entirely different depending on the facility and the type of goods.
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly, before Standard Containers, by the time a software component ran in production, it had been individually built, configured, bundled, documented, patched, vendored, templated, tweaked and instrumented by 10 different people on 10 different computers.
|
||||
Before Standard Containers, by the time a software component ran in production, it had been individually built, configured, bundled, documented, patched, vendored, templated, tweaked and instrumented by 10 different people on 10 different computers.
|
||||
Builds failed, libraries conflicted, mirrors crashed, post-it notes were lost, logs were misplaced, cluster updates were half-broken.
|
||||
The process was slow, inefficient and cost a fortune - and was entirely different depending on the language and infrastructure provider.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Industrial-grade delivery
|
||||
|
||||
There are 17 million shipping containers in existence, packed with every physical good imaginable.
|
||||
Every single one of them can be loaded onto the same boats, by the same cranes, in the same facilities, and sent anywhere in the World with incredible efficiency.
|
||||
It is embarrassing to think that a 30 ton shipment of coffee can safely travel half-way across the World in *less time* than it takes a software team to deliver its code from one datacenter to another sitting 10 miles away.
|
||||
|
||||
With Standard Containers we can put an end to that embarrassment, by making INDUSTRIAL-GRADE DELIVERY of software a reality.
|
||||
Standard Containers make INDUSTRIAL-GRADE DELIVERY of software a reality.
|
||||
Leveraging all of the properties listed above, Standard Containers are enabling large and small enterprises to streamline and automate their software delivery pipelines.
|
||||
Whether it is in-house devOps flows, or external customer-based software delivery mechanisms, Standard Containers are changing the way the community thinks about software packaging and delivery.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue