Merge pull request #622 from wking/rfc-2119-wording
README: Use recommended RFC 2119 wording
This commit is contained in:
commit
780fc67f04
|
@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Table of Contents
|
|||
- [Windows-specific Configuration](config-windows.md)
|
||||
- [Glossary](glossary.md)
|
||||
|
||||
In the specifications in the above table of contents, the keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119) (Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997).
|
||||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119][rfc2119].
|
||||
|
||||
The key words "unspecified", "undefined", and "implementation-defined" are to be interpreted as described in the [rationale for the C99 standard][c99-unspecified].
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -168,3 +168,4 @@ Read more on [How to Write a Git Commit Message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git
|
|||
[c99-unspecified]: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/C99RationaleV5.10.pdf#page=18
|
||||
[UberConference]: https://www.uberconference.com/opencontainers
|
||||
[irc-logs]: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/eavesdrop/%23opencontainers/
|
||||
[rfc2119]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue