split fs2 package from fs, as mixing up fs and fs2 is very likely to result in
unmaintainable code.
Inspired by containerd/cgroups#109
Fix#2157
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp>
Runc needs to copy certain files from the top of the cgroup cpuset hierarchy
into the container's cpuset cgroup directory. Currently, runc determines
which directory is the top of the hierarchy by using the parent dir of
the first entry in /proc/self/mountinfo of type cgroup.
This creates problems when cgroup subsystems are mounted arbitrarily in
different dirs on the host.
Now, we use the most deeply nested mountpoint that contains the
container's cpuset cgroup directory.
Signed-off-by: Konstantinos Karampogias <konstantinos.karampogias@swisscom.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Martin <wmartin@pivotal.io>
This PR fix issue in this scenario:
```
in terminal 1:
~# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset
~# mkdir test
~# cd test
~# cat cpuset.cpus
0-3
~# echo 1 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive (make sure you don't have other cgroups under root)
in terminal 2:
~# echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/test/tasks
// set resources.cpu.cpus="0-2" in config.json
~# runc run test1
back to terminal 1:
~# cd test1
~# cat cpuset.cpus
0-2
~# echo 1 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive
in terminal 3:
~# echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/tasks
// set resources.cpu.cpus="3" in config.json
~# runc run test2
container_linux.go:247: starting container process caused "process_linux.go:258:
applying cgroup configuration for process caused \"failed to write 0-3\\n to
cpuset.cpus: write /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/test2/cpuset.cpus: invalid argument\""
```
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
Apply and Set are two separate operations, and it doesn't make sense to
group the two together (especially considering that the bootstrap
process is added to the cgroup as well). The only exception to this is
the memory cgroup, which requires the configuration to be set before
processes can join.
One of the weird cases to deal with is systemd. Systemd sets some of the
cgroup configuration options, but not all of them. Because memory is a
special case, we need to explicitly set memory in the systemd Apply().
Otherwise, the rest can be safely re-applied in .Set() as usual.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>
Properly sanitise the --cgroup-parent path, to avoid potential issues
(as it starts creating directories and writing to files as root). In
addition, fix an infinite recursion due to incomplete base cases.
It might be a good idea to move pathClean to a separate library (which
deals with path safety concerns, so all of runC and Docker can take
advantage of it).
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>
Apply and Set are two separate operations, and it doesn't make sense to
group the two together (especially considering that the bootstrap
process is added to the cgroup as well). The only exception to this is
the memory cgroup, which requires the configuration to be set before
processes can join.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>
This allows us to distinguish cases where a container
needs to just join the paths or also additionally
set cgroups settings. This will help in implementing
cgroupsPath support in the spec.
Signed-off-by: Mrunal Patel <mrunalp@gmail.com>
The former cgroup entry is confusing, separate it to parent
and name.
Rename entry `c` to `config`.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
'parent' function is confusing with parent cgroup, it's actually
parent path, so rename it to parentPath.
The name 'data' is too common to be identified, rename it to cgroupData
which is exactly what it is.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
It can avoid unnecessary task migrataion, see this scenario:
- container init task is on cpu 1, and we assigned it to cpu 1,
but parent cgroup's cpuset.cpus=2
- we created the cgroup dir and inherited cpuset.cpus from parent as 2
- write container init task's pid to cgroup.procs
- [it's possibile the container init task migrated to cpu 2 here]
- set cpuset.cpus as assigned to cpu 1
- [the container init task has to be migrated back to cpu 1]
So we should set cpuset.cpus and cpuset.mems before writing pids
to cgroup.procs to aviod such problem.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
TL;DR: check for IsExist(err) after a failed MkdirAll() is both
redundant and wrong -- so two reasons to remove it.
Quoting MkdirAll documentation:
> MkdirAll creates a directory named path, along with any necessary
> parents, and returns nil, or else returns an error. If path
> is already a directory, MkdirAll does nothing and returns nil.
This means two things:
1. If a directory to be created already exists, no error is
returned.
2. If the error returned is IsExist (EEXIST), it means there exists
a non-directory with the same name as MkdirAll need to use for
directory. Example: we want to MkdirAll("a/b"), but file "a"
(or "a/b") already exists, so MkdirAll fails.
The above is a theory, based on quoted documentation and my UNIX
knowledge.
3. In practice, though, current MkdirAll implementation [1] returns
ENOTDIR in most of cases described in #2, with the exception when
there is a race between MkdirAll and someone else creating the
last component of MkdirAll argument as a file. In this very case
MkdirAll() will indeed return EEXIST.
Because of #1, IsExist check after MkdirAll is not needed.
Because of #2 and #3, ignoring IsExist error is just plain wrong,
as directory we require is not created. It's cleaner to report
the error now.
Note this error is all over the tree, I guess due to copy-paste,
or trying to follow the same usage pattern as for Mkdir(),
or some not quite correct examples on the Internet.
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/blob/f9ed2f75/src/os/path.go
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>
Akihiro Suda
Dominik Süß
Yan Zhu
Craig Furman
Qiang Huang
Buddha Prakash
Kenfe-Mickael Laventure
Mrunal Patel
Aleksa Sarai
Mrunal Patel
Michael Crosby
Kir Kolyshkin