Don't use strings when you can use dictionaries/objects. JSON objects are trivial to parse and manipulate, unlike strings. String parsing is the #1 cause of security bugs, so if it can be trivially avoided, then why not ;)
In #opencontainers after today's meeting, here's the source for the
change from Google Hangouts to BlueJeans:
12:01 < wking> Is the BlueJeans approach going to be our standard
procedure? If so, I can file a PR updating our weekly-meeting docs
(which still talk about YouTube and Google Hangouts)
12:03 < mrunalp> wking: Yeah, I think so.
12:04 < wking> ok. And it's just going to "push the BlueJeans link to
IRC and the list before the meeting"? Or does BlueJeans have stable
channel URLs or similar?
12:05 < mrunalp> wking: The URL that we used today is stable.
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
I touched these paragraphs while removing trailing whitespace in the
previous commit. Since I was touching them in this branch, it seemed
better to rewrap them using the "Markdown style" suggestions in the
README.
I also added a missing period after the namespaces(7) link.
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
The fact that these are Linux-specific entities should be obvious from
the context (this whole file is only about Linux-specific entities).
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
This fixes a copy/paste issue with 7232e4b1 (specs: introduce the
concept of a runtime.json, 2015-07-30, #88).
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Based on our discussion in-person yesterday it seems necessary to
separate the concept of runtime configuration from application
configuration. There are a few motivators:
- To support runtime updates of things like cgroups, rlimits, etc we
should separate things that are inherently runtime specific from
things that are static to the application running in the container.
- To support the goal of being able to move a bundle between hosts we
should make it clear what parts of the spec are and are not portable
between hosts so that upon landing on a new host the non-portable
options may be rewritten or removed.
- In order to attach a cryptographic identity to a bundle we must not
include details in the bundle that are host specific.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:38:50AM -0700, Mrunal Patel wrote [1]:
> There is a limit of 10 participants per hangout. So, I will
> broadcast it at the time when it starts and people who aren't
> invited could view the stream and discuss on IRC.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:53:59AM -0700, Mrunal Patel wrote [2]:
> I think the youtube channel should work as the broadcast link
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1wmLdEYmwWcsFg7bt1s5nw
The IRC channel location is from opencontainers/web@f693390f (updated
content, 2015-06-21).
[1]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/d/msg/dev/Cy5uFI_ySpg/E1FnYUmfDwAJ
From: Mrunal Patel
Subject: Re: Discussions and Notes
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:38:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CANEZBD7K=8+i7RaTAkg_0XLUSQrZLykGR0bxce-JtErO8KAQ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dev <dev@opencontainers.org>, ...
[2]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/d/msg/dev/Cy5uFI_ySpg/X4RQEx2gDwAJ
From: Mrunal Patel
Subject: Re: Discussions and Notes
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:53:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CANEZBD7snSro5GXYc6QRuk3+KnR0WAeFThfQXvOcnx3t9jNXag@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dev <dev@opencontainers.org>, ...
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:57:59AM -0700, Mrunal Patel wrote [1]:
> We could also have guests on the hangout if they have some important
> topic to present. We can decide that on the topics being discussed
> in the mailing list.
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 08:23:21AM -0400, Vincent Batts wrote [2]:
> We said the topics would be proposed on this list. Discussion notes have
> been shared as a Google doc so far. I'm not opposed to markdown notes, but
> initially that just seems like an repo to me.
More generally, the topic of feedback loops came up in the 2015-08-05
meeting [3,4] (after 26:02 in the video), and the consensus was to
start discussion anything that seemed worth discussion on the mailing
list ("conversations and discussions should be on
dev@opencontainers.org mailing-list first, conversations and
discussions should be on dev@opencontainers.org" [3]). That doesn't
speak to agenda-formation specifically, but it makes an official
policy of discussing most things on the mailing list, and the two
posts I quote above extend that general approach to agenda formation.
While touching this paragraph, I also re-wrapped it to match
README.md#markdown-style.
[1]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/d/msg/dev/JsXgi4kxkBg/Gw7GvPodDgAJ
From: Mrunal Patel
Subject: Re: Hangout link for today
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:57:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CANEZBD6Zs5Ht8dgkvSHRHQGaVLms_kSGqCV00AJD6eFLm9hR4w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dev <dev@opencontainers.org>, …
[2]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/d/msg/dev/41jZ9Qe7R5c/ZInajC_0DgAJ
From: Vincent Batts
Subject: Re: Open Container Weekly Meeting - Aug 5, 2015
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 08:23:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN6Zp5yFX8yLG3b-82SAq7AmCxVpoy1tyt0K1ijFqSsCjKPRpg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dev <dev@opencontainers.org>, …
[3]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a5UW7MRLVaUDEjuQmRudYMZcPV0bBtPD2QEOLT_3zi0/edit?usp=sharing
[4]: https://plus.google.com/events/cqfpicicbnra9mv6kvpj0mb24u4
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
W. Trevor King
Michael Crosby
Vincent Batts
Brandon Philips
Timothy Hobbs
Alexander Morozov
Mrunal Patel
Brandon Philips
Tiesheng
Vincent Batts
LinZhinan(Zen Lin)
Mrunal Patel
Alexander Morozov
Jin-Hwan Jeong
Lai Jiangshan