This PR fix issue in this scenario:
```
in terminal 1:
~# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset
~# mkdir test
~# cd test
~# cat cpuset.cpus
0-3
~# echo 1 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive (make sure you don't have other cgroups under root)
in terminal 2:
~# echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/test/tasks
// set resources.cpu.cpus="0-2" in config.json
~# runc run test1
back to terminal 1:
~# cd test1
~# cat cpuset.cpus
0-2
~# echo 1 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive
in terminal 3:
~# echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/tasks
// set resources.cpu.cpus="3" in config.json
~# runc run test2
container_linux.go:247: starting container process caused "process_linux.go:258:
applying cgroup configuration for process caused \"failed to write 0-3\\n to
cpuset.cpus: write /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/test2/cpuset.cpus: invalid argument\""
```
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
This allows a user to send a signal to all the processes in the
container within a single atomic action to avoid new processes being
forked off before the signal can be sent.
This is basically taking functionality that we already use being
`delete` and exposing it ok the `kill` command by adding a flag.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
This moves the ambient capability support behind an `ambient` build tag
so that it is only compiled upon request.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
The default terminal setting for a new pty on Linux (unix98) has +ONLCR,
resulting in '\n' writes by a container process to be converted to
'\r\n' reads by the managing process. This is quite unexpected, and
causes multiple issues with things like bats testing. To fix it, make
the terminal sane after opening it by setting -ONLCR.
This patch might need to be rewritten after the console rewrite patchset
is merged.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
I use the same tool (https://github.com/client9/misspell)
as Daniel used a few days ago, don't why he missed these
typos at that time.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
config.cloneflag is not mandatory, when using `runc exec`,
config.cloneflag can be empty, and even then it won't be
`-1` but `0`.
So this validation is totally wrong and unneeded.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
When spec file contains duplicated namespaces, e.g.
specs: specs.Spec{
Linux: &specs.Linux{
Namespaces: []specs.Namespace{
{
Type: "pid",
},
{
Type: "pid",
Path: "/proc/1/ns/pid",
},
},
},
}
runc should report malformed spec instead of using latest one by
default, because this spec could be quite confusing.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Wei <zhangwei555@huawei.com>
Previously we only tested failures, which causes us to miss issues where
setting sysctls would *always* fail.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
When changing this validation, the code actually allowing the validation
to pass was removed. This meant that any net.* sysctl would always fail
to validate.
Fixes: bc84f83344 ("fix docker/docker#27484")
Reported-by: Justin Cormack <justin.cormack@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
This reverts part of the commit eb0a144b5e
That commit introduced two issues.
- We need to make parent mount of rootfs private before bind mounting
rootfs. Otherwise bind mounting root can propagate in other mount
namespaces. (If parent mount is shared).
- It broke test TestRootfsPropagationSharedMount() on Fedora.
On fedora /tmp is a mount point with "shared" propagation. I think
you should be able to reproduce it on other distributions as well
as long as you mount tmpfs on /tmp and make it "shared" propagation.
Reason for failure is that pivot_root() fails. And it fails because
kernel does following check.
IS_MNT_SHARED(new_mnt->mnt_parent)
Say /tmp/foo is new rootfs, we have bind mounted rootfs, so new_mnt
is /tmp/foo, and new_mnt->mnt_parent is /tmp which is "shared" on
fedora and above check fails.
So this change broke few things, it is a good idea to revert part of it.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Namely, use an undocumented feature of pivot_root(2) where
pivot_root(".", ".") is actually a feature and allows you to make the
old_root be tied to your /proc/self/cwd in a way that makes unmounting
easy. Thanks a lot to the LXC developers which came up with this idea
first.
This is the first step of many to allowing runC to work with a
completely read-only rootfs.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
Without this patch applied, RHEL's SELinux policies cause container
creation to not really work. Unfortunately this might be an issue for
rootless containers (opencontainers/runc#774) but we'll cross that
bridge when we come to it.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
Print the error message to stderr if we are unable to return it back via
the pipe to the parent process. Also, don't panic here as it is most
likely a system or user error and not a programmer error.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
We need support for read/only mounts in SELinux to allow a bunch of
containers to share the same read/only image. In order to do this
we need a new label which allows container processes to read/execute
all files but not write them.
Existing mount label is either shared write or private write. This
label is shared read/execute.
Signed-off-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Mrunal Patel
Daniel, Dao Quang Minh
Qiang Huang
rajasec
Michael Crosby
Aleksa Sarai
Crazykev
Zhang Wei
Vivek Goyal
Ce Gao
Alexander Morozov
Yong Tang
Derek Carr
Dan Walsh