With mknod entries in linux.devices and cgroups entries in
linux.resources.devices. Background discussion in [1].
For specifying device cgroups independent of device creation. This
makes it easy to distinguish between configs that call for cgroup
adjustments (which have linux.resources entries) from those that
don't. Without this split, folks interested in making that
distinction would have to parse the device section to determine if it
included cgroup changes. This will also make it easy to drop either
portion (mknod [2] or cgroups [3]) independently of the other if the
project decides to do so.
Using seperate sections for mknod and cgroups also allows us to avoid
the complicated validation rules needed for the combined format
mknod/cgroup [4].
Now that there is a section specific to supplying devices, I shifted
the default device listing over from config-linux [5]. The /dev/ptmx
entry is a bit awkward, since it's not a device, but it seemed to fit
better over here. But I would also be fine leaving it with the other
mounts in config-linux.
fileMode, uid, and gid are optional, because mknod(2) doesn't need
them and specifies the handling when they aren't set [6,7].
Similarly, major/minor numbers are only required for S_IFCHR and
S_IFBLK [6]. I've left off wording about required runtime behavior
for unset values, because I'd rather address that with a blanket rule
[8].
For the cgroup, access is optional because the kernel docs show an
example that doesn't write an access field to the devices.deny file
[9]. The current kernel docs don't go into much detail on this
behavior (I expect unset and 'rwm' are equivalent), but if the kernel
doesn't need a value written, the spec should get out of the way and
allow users to not specify a value.
The reference links are sorted into two blocks, with kernel-doc links
sorted alphabetically followed by man pages sorted alphabetically by
section. The cgroup link is new since 2016-01-13 [10].
[1]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/y_Fsa2_jJaM
Subject: Separate config entries for device mknod and cgroups?
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:46:55 -0700
Message-ID: <20151005194655.GN28418@odin.tremily.us>
[2]: https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/98
[3]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/qWHoKs8Fsrk
Subject: removal of cgroups from the OCI Linux spec
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:01:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD2oYtO1RMCcUp52w-xXemzDTs+J6t4hS5Mm4mX+uBnVONGDfA@mail.gmail.com>
[4]: https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/101
[5]: https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/171#discussion_r41190655
[6]: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/mknod.2.html#DESCRIPTION
[7]: https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/298/files#r51053835
[8]: https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/285#issuecomment-167823651
[9]: https://kernel.org/doc/Documentation/cgroup-v1/devices.txt
[10]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=34a9304a96d6351c2d35dcdc9293258378fc0bd8
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Reverting 7232e4b1 (specs: introduce the concept of a runtime.json,
2015-07-30, #88) after discussion on the mailing list [1]. The main
reason is that it's hard to draw a clear line around "inherently
runtime-specific" or "non-portable", so we shouldn't try to do that in
the spec. Folks who want to flag settings as non-portable for their
own system are welcome to do so (e.g. "we will clobber 'hooks' in
bundles we run") are welcome to do so, but we don't have to have
to split the config into multiple files to do that.
There have been a number of additional changes since #88, so this
isn't a pure Git reversion. Besides copy-pasting and the associated
link-target updates, I've:
* Restored path -> destination, now that the mount type contains both
source and target paths again. I'd prefer 'target' to 'destination'
to match mount(2), but the pre-7232e4b1 phrasing was 'destination'
(possibly due to Windows using 'target' for the source?).
* Restored the Windows mount example to its pre-7232e4b1 content.
* Removed required mounts from the config example (requirements landed
in 3848a238, config-linux: specify the default devices/filesystems
available, 2015-09-09, #164), because specifying those mounts in the
config is now redundant.
* Used headers (vs. bold paragraphs) to set off mount examples so we
get link anchors in the rendered Markdown.
* Replaced references to runtime.json with references to config.json.
[1]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/0QbyJDM9fWY
Subject: Single, unified config file (i.e. rolling back specs#88)
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:53:20 -0800
Message-ID: <20151104175320.GC24652@odin.tremily.us>
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
This is a security setting that could be used to prevent processes in the
container from gaining additional privileges.
Signed-off-by: Mrunal Patel <mrunalp@gmail.com>
Lets call out some users directly and give them titles. Then define what
they is trying to do.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Philips <brandon.philips@coreos.com>
pandoc/LaTeX is not happy with this shady character.
```
! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:↔ not set up for use with
LaTeX.
```
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@hashbangbash.com>
For now, just vet and lint. But would like to include the commit
validator, once a good range is selectable.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@hashbangbash.com>
After thorough discussion, even though a reasonable default is "/", for
platform independence, leave this up to the bundle author.
Also, by this variable being present it makes things explicit for the
runtime.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@hashbangbash.com>
We discussed this in the face to face meeting and agreed
that it makes sense to keep the rootfs as is for flexibility.
Signed-off-by: Mrunal Patel <mrunalp@gmail.com>
So we have something to cite to avoid rehashing established decisions.
Provide some motivation and links to the backing discussion so folks
can re-open these if they have new information that wasn't covered in
the original decision.
Like the glossary (18734986, glossary: Provide a quick overview of
important terms, 2015-08-11, #107), I've used subsection titles for
each entry to get link anchors.
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>