FreeBSD does not support cgroups or namespaces, which the code suggested, and is not supported
in runc anyway right now. So clean up the file naming to use `_linux` where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Justin Cormack <justin.cormack@docker.com>
vndr doesn't support non-top-level imports, and in addition we really
should be using tagged releases far more than we currently are
(*especially* when it come to the OCI specs).
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
When C/R was implemented, it was enough to call manager.Set to apply
limits and to move a task. Now .Set() and .Apply() have to be called
separately.
Fixes: 8a740d5391 ("libcontainer: cgroups: don't Set in Apply")
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
Instead of relying on version numbers it is possible to check if CRIU
actually supports certain features. This introduces an initial
implementation to check if CRIU and the underlying kernel actually
support dirty memory tracking for memory pre-dumping.
Upstream CRIU also supports the lazy-page migration feature check and
additional feature checks can be included in CRIU to reduce the version
number parsing. There are also certain CRIU features which depend on one
side on the CRIU version but also require certain kernel versions to
actually work. CRIU knows if it can do certain things on the kernel it
is running on and using the feature check RPC interface makes it easier
for runc to decide if the criu+kernel combination will support that
feature.
Feature checking was introduced with CRIU 1.8. Running with older CRIU
versions will ignore the feature check functionality and behave just
like it used to.
v2:
- Do not use reflection to compare requested and responded
features. Checking which feature is available is now hardcoded
and needs to be adapted for every new feature check. The code
is now much more readable and simpler.
v3:
- Move the variable criuFeat out of the linuxContainer struct,
as it is not container specific. Now it is a global variable.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Reber <areber@redhat.com>
The original implementation is in C, which increases cognitive load and
possibly might cause us problems in the future. Since sys/unix is better
maintained than the syscall standard library switching makes more sense.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
It turns out that the standard "syscall" library is not recommended for
new programs. runC will need to eventually move to this, but for now
include it in vendor so we can use it for new features.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
This adds targets for rootless integration tests, as well as all of the
required setup in order to get the tests to run. This includes quite a
few changes, because of a lot of assumptions about things running as
root within the bats scripts (which is not true when setting up rootless
containers).
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>