- Check if Selinux is enabled before relabeling. This is a bug.
- Make exclusion detection constant time. Kinda buggy too, imo.
- Do not depend on a magic string to create a new Selinux context.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
TL;DR: check for IsExist(err) after a failed MkdirAll() is both
redundant and wrong -- so two reasons to remove it.
Quoting MkdirAll documentation:
> MkdirAll creates a directory named path, along with any necessary
> parents, and returns nil, or else returns an error. If path
> is already a directory, MkdirAll does nothing and returns nil.
This means two things:
1. If a directory to be created already exists, no error is
returned.
2. If the error returned is IsExist (EEXIST), it means there exists
a non-directory with the same name as MkdirAll need to use for
directory. Example: we want to MkdirAll("a/b"), but file "a"
(or "a/b") already exists, so MkdirAll fails.
The above is a theory, based on quoted documentation and my UNIX
knowledge.
3. In practice, though, current MkdirAll implementation [1] returns
ENOTDIR in most of cases described in #2, with the exception when
there is a race between MkdirAll and someone else creating the
last component of MkdirAll argument as a file. In this very case
MkdirAll() will indeed return EEXIST.
Because of #1, IsExist check after MkdirAll is not needed.
Because of #2 and #3, ignoring IsExist error is just plain wrong,
as directory we require is not created. It's cleaner to report
the error now.
Note this error is all over the tree, I guess due to copy-paste,
or trying to follow the same usage pattern as for Mkdir(),
or some not quite correct examples on the Internet.
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/blob/f9ed2f75/src/os/path.go
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>
Actually cgroup mounts are bind-mounts, so they should be
handled by the same way.
Reported-by: Ross Boucher <rboucher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
And allow cgroup mount take flags from user configs.
As we show ro in the recommendation, so hard-coded
read-only flag should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
Fixes: https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/14543
Fixes: https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/14610
Before this, we got mount info in container:
```
sysfs /sys sysfs ro,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
/sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset cgroup rw,relatime,cpuset 0 0
```
It has no mount source, so in `parseInfoFile` in Docker code,
we'll get:
```
Error found less than 3 fields post '-' in "84 83 0:41 / /sys/fs/cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime - tmpfs rw,seclabel"
```
After this fix, we have mount info corrected:
```
sysfs /sys sysfs ro,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
tmpfs /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset cgroup rw,relatime,cpuset 0 0
```
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>