Create Notes.md
A notes file describing what's actually in the implementation. Will try to minimize the amount of speculative or TODO material here.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e6478e33b3
commit
92110efa67
|
@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
|||
# Notes on simdson
|
||||
|
||||
## Rationale:
|
||||
|
||||
The simdjson project serves two purposes:
|
||||
|
||||
1. It creates a useful library for parsing JSON data quickly.
|
||||
|
||||
2. It is a demonstration of the use of SIMD and pipelined programming techniques to perform a complex and irregular task.
|
||||
These techniques include the use of large registers and SIMD instructions to process large amounts of input data at once,
|
||||
to hold larger entities than can typically be held in a single General Purpose Register (GPR), and to perform operations
|
||||
that are not cheap to perform without use of a SIMD unit (for example table lookup using permute instructions).
|
||||
|
||||
The other key technique is that the system is designed to minimize the number of unpredictable branches that must be taken
|
||||
to perform the task. Modern architectures are both wide and deep (4-wide pipelines with ~14 stages are commonplace). A
|
||||
recent Intel Architecture processor, for example, can perform 3 256-bit SIMD operations or 2 512-bit SIMD operations per
|
||||
cycle as well as other operations on general purpose registers or with the load/store unit. An incorrectly predicted branch
|
||||
will clear this pipeline. While it is rare that a programmer can achieve the maximum throughput on a machine, a developer
|
||||
may be missing the opportunity to carry out 56 operations for each branch miss.
|
||||
|
||||
Many code-bases make use of SIMD and deeply pipelined, "non-branchy", processing for regular tasks. Numerical problems
|
||||
(e.g. "matrix multiply") or simple 'bulk search' tasks (e.g. "count all the occurrences of a given character in a text",
|
||||
"find the first occurrence of the string 'foo' in a text") frequently use this class of techniques. We are demonstrating
|
||||
that these techniques can be applied to much more complex and less regular task.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design:
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 1: SIMD over bytes; bit vector processing over bytes.
|
||||
|
||||
The first stage of our processing must identify key points in our input: the 'structural characters' of JSON (curly and
|
||||
square braces, colon, and comma), the start and end of strings as delineated by double quote characters, other JSON 'atoms'
|
||||
that are not distinguishable by simple characters (constructs such as "true", "false", "null" and numbers), as well as
|
||||
discovering these characters and atoms in the presence of both quoting conventions and backslash escaping conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
As such we follow the broad outline of the construction of a structural index as set forth in the Mison paper [XXX]; first,
|
||||
the discovery of odd-length sequences of backslash characters (which will cause quote characters immediately following to
|
||||
be escaped and not serve their quoting role but instead be literal charaters), second, the discovery of quote pairs (which
|
||||
cause structural characters within the quote pairs to also be merely literal characters and have no function as structural
|
||||
characters), then finally the discovery of structural characters not contained without the quote pairs.
|
||||
|
||||
We depart from the Mison paper in terms of method and overall design. In terms of method, the Mison paper uses iteration
|
||||
over bit vectors to discover backslash sequences and quote pairs; we introduce branch-free techniques to discover both of
|
||||
these properties.
|
||||
|
||||
We also make use of our ability to quickly detect whitespace in this early stage. We can use another bit-vector based
|
||||
transformation to discover locations in our data that follow a structural character or quote followed by zero or more
|
||||
characters of whitespace; excluding locations within strings, and the structural characters we have already discovered,
|
||||
these locations are the only place that we can expect to see the starts of the JSON 'atoms'. These locations are thus
|
||||
treated as 'structural' ('pseudo-structural characters').
|
||||
|
||||
This stage involves either SIMD processing over out bytes or the manipulation of bit arrays that have 1 bit corresponding
|
||||
to 1 byte of input. As such, it can be quite inefficient for some inputs - it is possible to observe dozens of operations
|
||||
taking place to discover that there are in fact no odd-numbered sequences of backslashes or quotes in a given block of
|
||||
input. However, this inefficiency on such inputs is balanced by the fact that it costs no more to run this code over
|
||||
complex structured input, and the alternatives would generally involve running a number of unpredictable branches (for
|
||||
example, the loop branches in Mison that iterate over bit vectors).
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 2: The transition from "SIMD over bytes" to "indices"
|
||||
|
||||
Our structural, pseudo-structural and other 'interesting' characters are relatively rare (TODO: quantify in detail -
|
||||
it's typically about 1 in 10). As such, continuing to process them as bit vectors will involve manipulating data structures
|
||||
that are relatively large as well as being fairly unpredictably spaced. We must transform these bitvectors of "interesting"
|
||||
locations into offsets.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that we can examine the character at the offset to discover what the original function of the item in the bitvector
|
||||
was. While the JSON structural characters and quotes are relatively self-explanatory (although working only with one offset
|
||||
at a time, we have lost the distinction between opening quotes and closing quotes, something that was available in Stage 1),
|
||||
it is a quirk of JSON that the legal atoms can all be distinguished from each other by their first character - 't' for
|
||||
'true', 'f' for 'false', 'n' for 'null' and the character class [0-9-] for numerical values.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus, the offset suffices, as long as we retain our original input.
|
||||
|
||||
Our current implementation involves a straightforward transformation of bitmaps to indices by use of the 'count trailing
|
||||
zeros' operation and the well-known operation to clear the lowest set bit. Note that this implementation introduces an
|
||||
unpredictable branch; unless there is a regular pattern in our bitmaps, we would expect to have at least one branch miss
|
||||
for each bitmap.
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 3: Operation over indices
|
||||
|
||||
The indices form a relatively concise map of structurally important parts of our JSON input. However, since JSON is
|
||||
recursively defined, we may nest structures (JSON "objects" and "arrays") inside other JSON structures. It is important
|
||||
to be able to quickly traverse portions of our JSON structure at any given level - it is trivial for us to move around
|
||||
in a way that follows the input text, but skipping to the next item at a given level may involve searching hundreds of
|
||||
bytes of text).
|
||||
|
||||
We can construct a simple data structure that allows us to thread together such structures relatively simply; at this
|
||||
stage this code is not branch-free. We use an implicit 'stack' structure by virtue of threading together 'up-level
|
||||
pointers' within the structure as we build it (these are pointers that, for each item in the structure we have seen
|
||||
already, tell us which item in the structure that contains this one); to pop up a level, we simply follow one layer
|
||||
of 'up-level pointers'.
|
||||
|
||||
An equivalent operation requiring an external data structure would be to maintain a stack that essentially describes
|
||||
all current levels of our structure as we traverse it; this may have performance advantages.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue