Merge pull request #4557 from Kanguros/master

Updating markers example to newest pytest version
This commit is contained in:
Bruno Oliveira 2018-12-17 12:45:27 -02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 0a40ae4c6a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 2 additions and 10 deletions

1
changelog/4557.doc.rst Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Markers example documentation page updated to support latest pytest version.

View File

@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ apply a marker to an individual test instance::
@pytest.mark.foo
@pytest.mark.parametrize(("n", "expected"), [
(1, 2),
pytest.mark.bar((1, 3)),
pytest.param((1, 3), marks=pytest.mark.bar),
(2, 3),
])
def test_increment(n, expected):
@ -318,15 +318,6 @@ In this example the mark "foo" will apply to each of the three
tests, whereas the "bar" mark is only applied to the second test.
Skip and xfail marks can also be applied in this way, see :ref:`skip/xfail with parametrize`.
.. note::
If the data you are parametrizing happen to be single callables, you need to be careful
when marking these items. ``pytest.mark.xfail(my_func)`` won't work because it's also the
signature of a function being decorated. To resolve this ambiguity, you need to pass a
reason argument:
``pytest.mark.xfail(func_bar, reason="Issue#7")``.
.. _`adding a custom marker from a plugin`:
Custom marker and command line option to control test runs