add a note about how a lightweight but more powerful function-mocker could be done
(compared to standard mock).
This commit is contained in:
parent
88aa8f5435
commit
654212d93b
18
ISSUES.txt
18
ISSUES.txt
|
@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
recorder = monkeypatch.function(".......")
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
tags: nice feature
|
||||
|
||||
Like monkeypatch.replace but sets a mock-like call recorder:
|
||||
|
||||
recorder = monkeypatch.function("os.path.abspath")
|
||||
recorder.set_return("/hello")
|
||||
os.path.abspath("hello")
|
||||
call, = recorder.calls
|
||||
assert call.args.path == "hello"
|
||||
assert call.returned == "/hello"
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike mock, "args.path" acts on the parsed auto-spec'ed ``os.path.abspath``
|
||||
so it's independent from if the client side called "os.path.abspath(path=...)"
|
||||
or "os.path.abspath('positional')".
|
||||
|
||||
refine parametrize API
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
tags: critical feature
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue