Merge pull request #1389 from nicoddemus/fix-strict-xfail
Fix bug in strict xfail: test was not being actually called
This commit is contained in:
commit
6940f82235
|
@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
|
|||
``xfail_strict`` ini option that can be used to configure it project-wise.
|
||||
Thanks `@rabbbit`_ for the request and `@nicoddemus`_ for the PR (`#1355`_).
|
||||
|
||||
* ``Parser.addini`` now supports options of type ``bool``. Thanks
|
||||
`@nicoddemus`_ for the PR.
|
||||
|
||||
* New ``ALLOW_BYTES`` doctest option strips ``b`` prefixes from byte strings
|
||||
in doctest output (similar to ``ALLOW_UNICODE``).
|
||||
Thanks `@jaraco`_ for the request and `@nicoddemus`_ for the PR (`#1287`_).
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -182,28 +182,37 @@ def pytest_runtest_setup(item):
|
|||
item._evalxfail = MarkEvaluator(item, 'xfail')
|
||||
check_xfail_no_run(item)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.hookwrapper
|
||||
def pytest_pyfunc_call(pyfuncitem):
|
||||
check_xfail_no_run(pyfuncitem)
|
||||
evalxfail = pyfuncitem._evalxfail
|
||||
if evalxfail.istrue() and _is_strict_xfail(evalxfail, pyfuncitem.config):
|
||||
del pyfuncitem._evalxfail
|
||||
explanation = evalxfail.getexplanation()
|
||||
pytest.fail('[XPASS(strict)] ' + explanation,
|
||||
pytrace=False)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _is_strict_xfail(evalxfail, config):
|
||||
default = config.getini('xfail_strict')
|
||||
return evalxfail.get('strict', default)
|
||||
outcome = yield
|
||||
passed = outcome.excinfo is None
|
||||
if passed:
|
||||
check_strict_xfail(pyfuncitem)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def check_xfail_no_run(item):
|
||||
"""check xfail(run=False)"""
|
||||
if not item.config.option.runxfail:
|
||||
evalxfail = item._evalxfail
|
||||
if evalxfail.istrue():
|
||||
if not evalxfail.get('run', True):
|
||||
pytest.xfail("[NOTRUN] " + evalxfail.getexplanation())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def check_strict_xfail(pyfuncitem):
|
||||
"""check xfail(strict=True) for the given PASSING test"""
|
||||
evalxfail = pyfuncitem._evalxfail
|
||||
if evalxfail.istrue():
|
||||
strict_default = pyfuncitem.config.getini('xfail_strict')
|
||||
is_strict_xfail = evalxfail.get('strict', strict_default)
|
||||
if is_strict_xfail:
|
||||
del pyfuncitem._evalxfail
|
||||
explanation = evalxfail.getexplanation()
|
||||
pytest.fail('[XPASS(strict)] ' + explanation, pytrace=False)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.hookimpl(hookwrapper=True)
|
||||
def pytest_runtest_makereport(item, call):
|
||||
outcome = yield
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ class TestFunction:
|
|||
return True
|
||||
config.pluginmanager.register(MyPlugin1())
|
||||
config.pluginmanager.register(MyPlugin2())
|
||||
config.hook.pytest_runtest_setup(item=item)
|
||||
config.hook.pytest_pyfunc_call(pyfuncitem=item)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_multiple_parametrize(self, testdir):
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -127,13 +127,15 @@ class TestEvaluator:
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestXFail:
|
||||
def test_xfail_simple(self, testdir):
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize('strict', [True, False])
|
||||
def test_xfail_simple(self, testdir, strict):
|
||||
item = testdir.getitem("""
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail(strict=%s)
|
||||
def test_func():
|
||||
assert 0
|
||||
""")
|
||||
""" % strict)
|
||||
reports = runtestprotocol(item, log=False)
|
||||
assert len(reports) == 3
|
||||
callreport = reports[1]
|
||||
|
@ -350,6 +352,23 @@ class TestXFail:
|
|||
matchline,
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_strict_sanity(self, testdir):
|
||||
"""sanity check for xfail(strict=True): a failing test should behave
|
||||
exactly like a normal xfail.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
p = testdir.makepyfile("""
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail(reason='unsupported feature', strict=True)
|
||||
def test_foo():
|
||||
assert 0
|
||||
""")
|
||||
result = testdir.runpytest(p, '-rxX')
|
||||
result.stdout.fnmatch_lines([
|
||||
'*XFAIL*',
|
||||
'*unsupported feature*',
|
||||
])
|
||||
assert result.ret == 0
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize('strict', [True, False])
|
||||
def test_strict_xfail(self, testdir, strict):
|
||||
p = testdir.makepyfile("""
|
||||
|
@ -357,7 +376,7 @@ class TestXFail:
|
|||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail(reason='unsupported feature', strict=%s)
|
||||
def test_foo():
|
||||
pass
|
||||
with open('foo_executed', 'w'): pass # make sure test executes
|
||||
""" % strict)
|
||||
result = testdir.runpytest(p, '-rxX')
|
||||
if strict:
|
||||
|
@ -371,6 +390,7 @@ class TestXFail:
|
|||
'XPASS test_strict_xfail.py::test_foo unsupported feature',
|
||||
])
|
||||
assert result.ret == (1 if strict else 0)
|
||||
assert testdir.tmpdir.join('foo_executed').isfile()
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize('strict', [True, False])
|
||||
def test_strict_xfail_condition(self, testdir, strict):
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue