From d15ee2fb8728d2c8adf546db063e26d11c64508b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: holger krekel <holger@merlinux.eu>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:51:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] some updates, add fslayout idea

---
 ISSUES.txt | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ISSUES.txt b/ISSUES.txt
index 5e683c769..928ef4591 100644
--- a/ISSUES.txt
+++ b/ISSUES.txt
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ change to pytest.mark.xfail(reason, (optional)condition)
 to better implement the word meaning.  It also signals
 better that we always have some kind of an implementation
 reason that can be formualated.
-Compatibility? Maybe rename to "pytest.mark.xfail"?
+Compatibility? how to introduce a new name/keep compat?
 
 introduce py.test.mark registration
 -----------------------------------------
@@ -250,3 +250,25 @@ In an effort to further simplify code, review and remove deprecated bits
 in collect.py.  Probably good:
 - inline consider_file/dir methods, no need to have them
   subclass-overridable because of hooks
+
+implement fslayout decorator
+---------------------------------
+tags: feature
+
+Improve the way how tests can work with pre-made examples,
+keeping the layout close to the test function:
+
+@pytest.mark.fslayout("""
+    conftest.py:
+        #  empty
+    tests/
+        test_%(NAME)s:  # becomes test_run1.py
+            def test_function(self):
+                pass
+""")
+def test_run(pytester, fslayout):
+    p = fslayout.find("test_*.py")
+    result = pytester.runpytest(p)
+    assert result.ret == 0
+    assert result.passed == 1
+