The dummy modules we introduce in `insert_missing_modules` (due to #7856 and #7859)
would cause problems if the dummy modules actually end up replacing modules
which could be imported normally because they are available in `PYTHONPATH`.
Now we attempt to first import the module via normal mechanisms, and only
introduce the dummy modules if the intermediary modules don't actually exist.
Close#9645
In the following
@pytest.mark.parametrize(..., ids=[val])
the ID values are only allowed to be `str`, `float`, `int` or `bool`.
In the following
@pytest.mark.parametrize(..., [val])
@pytest.mark.parametrize(..., [pytest.param(..., id=val])
a different code path is used, which also allows `bytes`, `complex`,
`re.Pattern`, `Enum` and anything with a `__name__`.
In the interest of consistency, use the latter code path for all cases.
This fixes#9610.
pytest 7.0.0 (unintentionally) changed `UnitTestFunction.obj`'s' behavior
to match `Function.obj`. That is probably a good thing to have, however
it evidently causes some regressions as described in the issue, so
restore the previous behavior for now. In the future we might want to
make this change again, but with proper consideration.
re: review from @asottile that this should only get imported in the function
modify the else/if logic since inside the function we already know the python version is >= 3.10, and just have to know if it is 3.11 or greater
* Add additional docs for uncooperative ctor deprecation
Fixes#9488
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* Break up long line
* Recommend kwonly args
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit only refactors, it does not change or add functionality yet. Public
API is retained. Reason or refactoring:
User provided parameter IDs (e.g. Metafunc.parametrize(ids=...)) had so far
only been used to calculate a unique test ID for each test invocation. That
test ID was a joined string where each parameter contributed some partial ID.
We're soon going to reuse functionality to generate parameter keys for
reorder_items and FixtureDef cache. We will be interested in the partial
IDs, and only if they originate from explicit user information. Refactoring
makes logic and data accessible for reuse, and increases cohesion in general.
The docstring (and function name itself) described things as if IDs are
being assigned to the argnames, but actually they're assigned to the
parameter sets.
If we do the `update`s in the right order, we can avoid the `mark.name
not in self.keywords` check, since `self.keywords` starts out clean and
`update` will override previously set keywords.
By my analysis, this deleted code block has no effect:
1. `self.keywords` is `update`d with `callspec.marks`.
2. `self.own_markers` is `update`d with `callspec.marks`.
3. `self.keywords` is `update`d with `self.own_markers`.
So together steps 2+3 completely undo step 1.
This does have a slight semantic change: in a node hierarchy parent ->
child, if parent has a marker applied, then child is constructed, then
`parent.themarker = "overridden"`, previously
`child.keywords['themarker']` would return `True`, now it returns
`"overridden"`. But that's actually what I would have expected so I see
it as more of a bugfix.
(except `Instance`)
Currently, `Function` does this manually, but other node types don't get
their markers added to their `keywords`, but they should, if only for
consistency.
Marks are added to keywords in three places:
- `Node.add_marker`: name -> `Mark`
- `Function.__init__(callspec)`: name -> `Mark`
- `Function.__init__ iter_markers`: name -> True
I think it should be consistent, which will also help with some upcoming
code cleaning. The `Mark` seems more useful than just a `True`, so
switch to that.
* Add docs on pytest.warns(None) deprecation
* Add new section for common warnings use cases
* Fix references for warnings use cases
* Fix reference link
I think this named function makes the code a bit easier to understand.
Also change the check to explicitly check for "is a sub-path of" instead
of the previous check which only worked assuming that path is within
confcutdir or a direct parent of it.