35 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
Automatic API documentation generation - first outcome
|
|
======================================================
|
|
|
|
After the first implementation of API generation tool,
|
|
I've realised that there are several shortcoming in current
|
|
attempt.
|
|
|
|
First of all, we need to define our type system. The one presented
|
|
in PyPy is just to weak to our purpose. This will not be very easy
|
|
issue anyway. Basic ideas are very much like the PyPy one, but
|
|
from the beggining we want to support all rich python typesystem, not
|
|
only the subset of it. So we need to provide informations which are
|
|
valuable for the end user (quite rich type system) and can always
|
|
work. I don't think that actuall tracking of all possible values of
|
|
objects makes sense. User might see them in call sites if he really wants
|
|
to.
|
|
|
|
Second thing is that we need some kind of structure (we do lack such
|
|
attempt now), which can group several classes/functions/objects into
|
|
a module (split by '.' or whatever).
|
|
|
|
Another thing is that we need to support any possible object which
|
|
are actually exported (well, we might assume that objects which
|
|
are exported are to some extend constants).
|
|
|
|
We need to track somehow several objects, which are not entirely
|
|
Python user-build objects. This means probably: builtin functions,
|
|
classes with builtin __init__, etc. etc.
|
|
|
|
And as well implement stuff like c_call, c_return and such.
|
|
|
|
I guess that keeping track of side effects might happen at some point
|
|
in the future, but it's not *now*.
|