django/docs/howto/custom-lookups.txt

==============
Custom Lookups
==============

.. currentmodule:: django.db.models

Django offers a wide variety of :ref:`built-in lookups <field-lookups>` for
filtering (for example, ``exact`` and ``icontains``). This documentation
explains how to write custom lookups and how to alter the working of existing
lookups. For the API references of lookups, see the :doc:`/ref/models/lookups`.

A simple lookup example
=======================

Let's start with a simple custom lookup. We will write a custom lookup ``ne``
which works opposite to ``exact``. ``Author.objects.filter(name__ne='Jack')``
will translate to the SQL::

  "author"."name" <> 'Jack'

This SQL is backend independent, so we don't need to worry about different
databases.

There are two steps to making this work. Firstly we need to implement the
lookup, then we need to tell Django about it. The implementation is quite
straightforward::

  from django.db.models import Lookup

  class NotEqual(Lookup):
      lookup_name = 'ne'

      def as_sql(self, compiler, connection):
          lhs, lhs_params = self.process_lhs(compiler, connection)
          rhs, rhs_params = self.process_rhs(compiler, connection)
          params = lhs_params + rhs_params
          return '%s <> %s' % (lhs, rhs), params

To register the ``NotEqual`` lookup we will just need to call
``register_lookup`` on the field class we want the lookup to be available. In
this case, the lookup makes sense on all ``Field`` subclasses, so we register
it with ``Field`` directly::

  from django.db.models.fields import Field
  Field.register_lookup(NotEqual)

Lookup registration can also be done using a decorator pattern::

    from django.db.models.fields import Field

    @Field.register_lookup
    class NotEqualLookup(Lookup):
        # ...

We can now use ``foo__ne`` for any field ``foo``. You will need to ensure that
this registration happens before you try to create any querysets using it. You
could place the implementation in a ``models.py`` file, or register the lookup
in the ``ready()`` method of an ``AppConfig``.

Taking a closer look at the implementation, the first required attribute is
``lookup_name``. This allows the ORM to understand how to interpret ``name__ne``
and use ``NotEqual`` to generate the SQL. By convention, these names are always
lowercase strings containing only letters, but the only hard requirement is
that it must not contain the string ``__``.

We then need to define the ``as_sql`` method. This takes a ``SQLCompiler``
object, called ``compiler``,  and the active database connection.
``SQLCompiler`` objects are not documented, but the only thing we need to know
about them is that they have a ``compile()`` method which returns a tuple
containing an SQL string, and the parameters to be interpolated into that
string. In most cases, you don't need to use it directly and can pass it on to
``process_lhs()`` and ``process_rhs()``.

A ``Lookup`` works against two values, ``lhs`` and ``rhs``, standing for
left-hand side and right-hand side. The left-hand side is usually a field
reference, but it can be anything implementing the :ref:`query expression API
<query-expression>`. The right-hand is the value given by the user. In the
example ``Author.objects.filter(name__ne='Jack')``, the left-hand side is a
reference to the ``name`` field of the ``Author`` model, and ``'Jack'`` is the
right-hand side.

We call ``process_lhs`` and ``process_rhs`` to convert them into the values we
need for SQL using the ``compiler`` object described before. These methods
return tuples containing some SQL and the parameters to be interpolated into
that SQL, just as we need to return from our ``as_sql`` method. In the above
example, ``process_lhs`` returns ``('"author"."name"', [])`` and
``process_rhs`` returns ``('"%s"', ['Jack'])``. In this example there were no
parameters for the left hand side, but this would depend on the object we have,
so we still need to include them in the parameters we return.

Finally we combine the parts into an SQL expression with ``<>``, and supply all
the parameters for the query. We then return a tuple containing the generated
SQL string and the parameters.

A simple transformer example
============================

The custom lookup above is great, but in some cases you may want to be able to
chain lookups together. For example, let's suppose we are building an
application where we want to make use of the ``abs()`` operator.
We have an ``Experiment`` model which records a start value, end value, and the
change (start - end). We would like to find all experiments where the change
was equal to a certain amount (``Experiment.objects.filter(change__abs=27)``),
or where it did not exceed a certain amount
(``Experiment.objects.filter(change__abs__lt=27)``).

.. note::
    This example is somewhat contrived, but it nicely demonstrates the range of
    functionality which is possible in a database backend independent manner,
    and without duplicating functionality already in Django.

We will start by writing an ``AbsoluteValue`` transformer. This will use the SQL
function ``ABS()`` to transform the value before comparison::

  from django.db.models import Transform

  class AbsoluteValue(Transform):
      lookup_name = 'abs'
      function = 'ABS'

Next, let's register it for ``IntegerField``::

  from django.db.models import IntegerField
  IntegerField.register_lookup(AbsoluteValue)

We can now run the queries we had before.
``Experiment.objects.filter(change__abs=27)`` will generate the following SQL::

    SELECT ... WHERE ABS("experiments"."change") = 27

By using ``Transform`` instead of ``Lookup`` it means we are able to chain
further lookups afterwards. So
``Experiment.objects.filter(change__abs__lt=27)`` will generate the following
SQL::

    SELECT ... WHERE ABS("experiments"."change") < 27

Note that in case there is no other lookup specified, Django interprets
``change__abs=27`` as ``change__abs__exact=27``.

This also allows the result to be used in ``ORDER BY`` and ``DISTINCT ON``
clauses. For example ``Experiment.objects.order_by('change__abs')`` generates::

    SELECT ... ORDER BY ABS("experiments"."change") ASC

And on databases that support distinct on fields (such as PostgreSQL),
``Experiment.objects.distinct('change__abs')`` generates::

    SELECT ... DISTINCT ON ABS("experiments"."change")

.. versionchanged:: 2.1

    Ordering and distinct support as described in the last two paragraphs was
    added.

When looking for which lookups are allowable after the ``Transform`` has been
applied, Django uses the ``output_field`` attribute. We didn't need to specify
this here as it didn't change, but supposing we were applying ``AbsoluteValue``
to some field which represents a more complex type (for example a point
relative to an origin, or a complex number) then we may have wanted to specify
that the transform returns a ``FloatField`` type for further lookups. This can
be done by adding an ``output_field`` attribute to the transform::

    from django.db.models import FloatField, Transform

    class AbsoluteValue(Transform):
        lookup_name = 'abs'
        function = 'ABS'

        @property
        def output_field(self):
            return FloatField()

This ensures that further lookups like ``abs__lte`` behave as they would for
a ``FloatField``.

Writing an efficient ``abs__lt`` lookup
=======================================

When using the above written ``abs`` lookup, the SQL produced will not use
indexes efficiently in some cases. In particular, when we use
``change__abs__lt=27``, this is equivalent to ``change__gt=-27`` AND
``change__lt=27``. (For the ``lte`` case we could use the SQL ``BETWEEN``).

So we would like ``Experiment.objects.filter(change__abs__lt=27)`` to generate
the following SQL::

    SELECT .. WHERE "experiments"."change" < 27 AND "experiments"."change" > -27

The implementation is::

  from django.db.models import Lookup

  class AbsoluteValueLessThan(Lookup):
      lookup_name = 'lt'

      def as_sql(self, compiler, connection):
          lhs, lhs_params = compiler.compile(self.lhs.lhs)
          rhs, rhs_params = self.process_rhs(compiler, connection)
          params = lhs_params + rhs_params + lhs_params + rhs_params
          return '%s < %s AND %s > -%s' % (lhs, rhs, lhs, rhs), params

  AbsoluteValue.register_lookup(AbsoluteValueLessThan)

There are a couple of notable things going on. First, ``AbsoluteValueLessThan``
isn't calling ``process_lhs()``. Instead it skips the transformation of the
``lhs`` done by ``AbsoluteValue`` and uses the original ``lhs``. That is, we
want to get ``"experiments"."change"`` not ``ABS("experiments"."change")``.
Referring directly to ``self.lhs.lhs`` is safe as ``AbsoluteValueLessThan``
can be accessed only from the ``AbsoluteValue`` lookup, that is the ``lhs``
is always an instance of ``AbsoluteValue``.

Notice also that  as both sides are used multiple times in the query the params
need to contain ``lhs_params`` and ``rhs_params`` multiple times.

The final query does the inversion (``27`` to ``-27``) directly in the
database. The reason for doing this is that if the ``self.rhs`` is something else
than a plain integer value (for example an ``F()`` reference) we can't do the
transformations in Python.

.. note::
    In fact, most lookups with ``__abs`` could be implemented as range queries
    like this, and on most database backends it is likely to be more sensible to
    do so as you can make use of the indexes. However with PostgreSQL you may
    want to add an index on ``abs(change)`` which would allow these queries to
    be very efficient.

A bilateral transformer example
===============================

The ``AbsoluteValue`` example we discussed previously is a transformation which
applies to the left-hand side of the lookup. There may be some cases where you
want the transformation to be applied to both the left-hand side and the
right-hand side. For instance, if you want to filter a queryset based on the
equality of the left and right-hand side insensitively to some SQL function.

Let's examine the simple example of case-insensitive transformation here. This
transformation isn't very useful in practice as Django already comes with a bunch
of built-in case-insensitive lookups, but it will be a nice demonstration of
bilateral transformations in a database-agnostic way.

We define an ``UpperCase`` transformer which uses the SQL function ``UPPER()`` to
transform the values before comparison. We define
:attr:`bilateral = True <django.db.models.Transform.bilateral>` to indicate that
this transformation should apply to both ``lhs`` and ``rhs``::

  from django.db.models import Transform

  class UpperCase(Transform):
      lookup_name = 'upper'
      function = 'UPPER'
      bilateral = True

Next, let's register it::

  from django.db.models import CharField, TextField
  CharField.register_lookup(UpperCase)
  TextField.register_lookup(UpperCase)

Now, the queryset ``Author.objects.filter(name__upper="doe")`` will generate a case
insensitive query like this::

    SELECT ... WHERE UPPER("author"."name") = UPPER('doe')

Writing alternative implementations for existing lookups
========================================================

Sometimes different database vendors require different SQL for the same
operation. For this example we will rewrite a custom implementation for
MySQL for the NotEqual operator. Instead of ``<>`` we will be using ``!=``
operator. (Note that in reality almost all databases support both, including
all the official databases supported by Django).

We can change the behavior on a specific backend by creating a subclass of
``NotEqual`` with an ``as_mysql`` method::

  class MySQLNotEqual(NotEqual):
      def as_mysql(self, compiler, connection, **extra_context):
          lhs, lhs_params = self.process_lhs(compiler, connection)
          rhs, rhs_params = self.process_rhs(compiler, connection)
          params = lhs_params + rhs_params
          return '%s != %s' % (lhs, rhs), params

  Field.register_lookup(MySQLNotEqual)

We can then register it with ``Field``. It takes the place of the original
``NotEqual`` class as it has the same ``lookup_name``.

When compiling a query, Django first looks for ``as_%s % connection.vendor``
methods, and then falls back to ``as_sql``. The vendor names for the in-built
backends are ``sqlite``, ``postgresql``, ``oracle`` and ``mysql``.

How Django determines the lookups and transforms which are used
===============================================================

In some cases you may wish to dynamically change which ``Transform`` or
``Lookup`` is returned based on the name passed in, rather than fixing it. As
an example, you could have a field which stores coordinates or an arbitrary
dimension, and wish to allow a syntax like ``.filter(coords__x7=4)`` to return
the objects where the 7th coordinate has value 4. In order to do this, you
would override ``get_lookup`` with something like::

    class CoordinatesField(Field):
        def get_lookup(self, lookup_name):
            if lookup_name.startswith('x'):
                try:
                    dimension = int(lookup_name[1:])
                except ValueError:
                    pass
                else:
                    return get_coordinate_lookup(dimension)
            return super().get_lookup(lookup_name)

You would then define ``get_coordinate_lookup`` appropriately to return a
``Lookup`` subclass which handles the relevant value of ``dimension``.

There is a similarly named method called ``get_transform()``. ``get_lookup()``
should always return a ``Lookup`` subclass, and ``get_transform()`` a
``Transform`` subclass. It is important to remember that ``Transform``
objects can be further filtered on, and ``Lookup`` objects cannot.

When filtering, if there is only one lookup name remaining to be resolved, we
will look for a ``Lookup``. If there are multiple names, it will look for a
``Transform``. In the situation where there is only one name and a ``Lookup``
is not found, we look for a ``Transform`` and then the ``exact`` lookup on that
``Transform``. All call sequences always end with a ``Lookup``. To clarify:

- ``.filter(myfield__mylookup)`` will call ``myfield.get_lookup('mylookup')``.
- ``.filter(myfield__mytransform__mylookup)`` will call
  ``myfield.get_transform('mytransform')``, and then
  ``mytransform.get_lookup('mylookup')``.
- ``.filter(myfield__mytransform)`` will first call
  ``myfield.get_lookup('mytransform')``, which will fail, so it will fall back
  to calling ``myfield.get_transform('mytransform')`` and then
  ``mytransform.get_lookup('exact')``.