p15693087
/
django
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Made some changes to db-api docs 

git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@32 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
Adrian Holovaty 2005-07-14 19:25:13 +00:00
parent fda1f68492
commit 26c6566215
1 changed files with 82 additions and 48 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

128
docs/db-api.txt
View File

@ -4,12 +4,9 @@ Database API reference
XXX INTRO HERE XXX
Throughout this reference, I'll be referring to the following Poll application::
Throughout this reference, we'll refer to the following Poll application::
class Poll(meta.Model):
module_name = 'polls'
verbose_name = 'poll'
db_table = 'polls'
fields = (
meta.SlugField('slug', 'slug', unique_for_month='pub_date'),
meta.CharField('question', 'question', maxlength=255),
@ -18,13 +15,9 @@ Throughout this reference, I'll be referring to the following Poll application::
)
class Choice(meta.Model):
module_name = 'choices'
verbose_name = 'choice'
db_table = 'poll_choices'
fields = (
meta.IntegerField('poll_id', 'poll', rel=meta.ManyToOne(Poll, 'poll', 'id',
edit_inline=True, edit_inline_type=meta.TABULAR, num_in_admin=10,
min_num_in_admin=5)),
meta.ForeignKey(Poll, edit_inline=True, edit_inline_type=meta.TABULAR,
num_in_admin=10, min_num_in_admin=5),
meta.CharField('choice', 'choice', maxlength=255, core=True),
meta.IntegerField('votes', 'votes', editable=False, default=0),
)
@ -35,8 +28,8 @@ Basic lookup functions
Each model exposes three basic functions for lookups: ``get_object``,
``get_list``, and ``get_count``. These functions all take the same arguments,
but ``get_object`` assumes that only a single record will be returned (and
raises an exception if that's not true), ``get_count`` simple returns a count of
objects matched by the lookup, and ``get_list`` returns the entire list.
raises ``AssertionError`` if that's not true), ``get_count`` simply returns a
count of objects matched by the lookup, and ``get_list`` returns a list of objects.
Field lookups
=============
@ -48,7 +41,7 @@ double-underscore). For example::
translates (roughly) into the following SQL:
SELECT * FROM polls WHERE pub_date < NOW();
SELECT * FROM polls_polls WHERE pub_date < NOW();
The DB API supports the following lookup types:
@ -59,10 +52,10 @@ The DB API supports the following lookup types:
iexact Case-insensitive exact match:
``polls.get_list(slug__iexact="foo")`` matches a slug of ``foo``,
``FOO``, ``fOo``, etc.
contains Case-sensitive contains test:
contains Case-sensitive containment test:
``polls.get_list(question__contains="spam")`` returns all polls
that contain "spam" in the question.
icontains Case-insensitive contains
icontains Case-insensitive containment test
gt Greater than: ``polls.get_list(id__gt=4)``
gte Greater than or equal to
lt Less than
@ -71,7 +64,7 @@ The DB API supports the following lookup types:
``polls.get_list(question_startswith="Would")``
endswith Case-sensitive ends-with
range Range test:
``polls.get_list(pub_date__range=(start_date, end_date)``
``polls.get_list(pub_date__range=(start_date, end_date))``
returns all polls with a pub_date between ``start_date``
and ``end_date`` (inclusive).
year For date/datetime fields, exact year match:
@ -82,7 +75,7 @@ The DB API supports the following lookup types:
``polls.get_list(expire_date__isnull=True)``.
========== ==============================================================
Multiple lookups are of course allowed, and are translated as "ands"::
Multiple lookups are allowed, of course, and are translated as "AND"s::
polls.get_list(
pub_date__year=2005,
@ -90,11 +83,7 @@ Multiple lookups are of course allowed, and are translated as "ands"::
question__startswith="Would",
)
retrieves all polls published in Jan. 2005 whose question starts with "Would."
"Or" lookups are also possible::
XXX FIXME XXX
...retrieves all polls published in January 2005 that have a question starting with "Would."
Ordering
========
@ -112,7 +101,7 @@ provided by the ``order_by`` argument to a lookup::
The result set above will be ordered by ``pub_date`` (descending), then
by ``question`` (ascending). Just like in models, the ``order_by`` clause
is a list of ordering tuples where the first element is the field and the
second is "ASC" or "DESC" to order ascending or descending. You may also
second is "ASC" (ascending) or "DESC" (descending). You can also
use the tuple ``(None, "RANDOM")`` to order the result set randomly.
Relationships (joins)
@ -123,14 +112,14 @@ Joins may implicitly be performed by following relationships:
objects where the associated ``Poll`` has a slug of ``eggs``. Multiple levels
of joins are allowed.
Given an instance of an object, related objects can be looked up directly using
connivence functions, for example, if ``poll`` is a ``Poll`` instance,
``poll.get_choice_list()`` will return a list of all associated choices (astute
Given an instance of an object, related objects can be looked-up directly using
convenience functions. For example, if ``p`` is a ``Poll`` instance,
``p.get_choice_list()`` will return a list of all associated choices. Astute
readers will note that this is the same as
``choices.get_list(poll_id__exact=poll.id)``, except clearer).
``choices.get_list(poll_id__exact=p.id)``, except clearer.
Each type of relationship creates a set of methods on each object in the
relationship. These created methods go both ways, so objects that are
relationship. These methods are created in both directions, so objects that are
"related-to" need not explicitly define reverse relationships; that happens
automatically.
@ -141,7 +130,6 @@ Each object in a one-to-one relationship will have a ``get_relatedobject()``
method. For example::
class Place(meta.Model):
...
fields = (
...
)
@ -160,23 +148,29 @@ and each ``Restaurant`` will have a ``get_place()`` method.
Many-to-one relations
---------------------
In each many-to-one relationship the related object will have a
In each many-to-one relationship, the related object will have a
``get_relatedobject()`` method, and the related-to object will have
``get_relatedobject()``, ``get_relatedobject_list()``, and
``get_relatedobject_count()`` methods (the same as the module-level
``get_object()``, ``get_list()``, and ``get_count()`` methods).
Thus, for the ``Poll`` example at the top, ``Choice`` objects will have a
``get_poll()`` method, and ``Poll`` objects will have ``get_choice()``,
``get_choice_list()``, and ``get_choice_count()`` functions.
In the poll example above, here are the available choice methods on a ``Poll`` object ``p``::
p.get_choice()
p.get_choice_list()
p.get_choice_count()
And a ``Choice`` object ``c`` has the following method::
c.get_poll()
Many-to-many relations
----------------------
Many-to-many relations result in the same set of methods as `Many-to-one relations`_,
except that the ``get_relatedobjects()`` function on the related object will
except that the ``get_relatedobject_list()`` function on the related object will
return a list of instances instead of a single instance. So, if the relationship
between ``Poll`` and ``Choice`` was many-to-many, ``choice.get_polls()`` would
between ``Poll`` and ``Choice`` was many-to-many, ``choice.get_poll_list()`` would
return a list.
Relationships across applications
@ -192,10 +186,9 @@ Selecting related objects
Relations are the bread and butter of databases, so there's an option to "follow"
all relationships and pre-fill them in a simple cache so that later calls to
objects with a one-to-many relationship don't have to hit the database. If you pass
``select_related=True`` to a lookup, this pre-caching of relationships will be performed.
This results in (sometimes much) larger queries, but it means that later use of
relationships is much faster.
objects with a one-to-many relationship don't have to hit the database. Do this by
passing ``select_related=True`` to a lookup. This results in (sometimes much) larger
queries, but it means that later use of relationships is much faster.
For example, using the Poll and Choice models from above, if you do the following::
@ -203,6 +196,35 @@ For example, using the Poll and Choice models from above, if you do the followin
Then subsequent calls to ``c.get_poll()`` won't hit the database.
Note that ``select_related`` follows foreign keys as far as possible. If you have the
following models...
class Poll(meta.Model):
...
class Choice(meta.Model):
fields = (
meta.ForeignKey(Poll),
...
)
class SingleVote(meta.Model):
fields = (
meta.ForeignKey(Choice),
...
)
...then a call to ``singlevotes.get_object(id__exact=4, select_related=True)`` will
cache the related choice *and* the related poll.
>>> sv = singlevotes.get_object(id__exact=4, select_related=True)
>>> c = sv.get_choice() # Doesn't hit the database.
>>> p = c.get_poll() # Doesn't hit the database.
>>> sv = singlevotes.get_object(id__exact=4) # Note no "select_related".
>>> c = sv.get_choice() # Hits the database.
>>> p = c.get_poll() # Hits the database.
Limiting selected rows
======================
@ -210,16 +232,16 @@ The ``limit``, ``offset``, and ``distinct`` keywords can be used to control
which rows are returned. Both ``limit`` and ``offset`` should be integers which
will be directly passed to the SQL ``LIMIT``/``OFFSET`` commands.
If ``distinct`` is True, only distinct rows will be returned (this is equivalent
to a ``SELECT DISTINCT`` SQL clause).
If ``distinct`` is True, only distinct rows will be returned. This is equivalent
to a ``SELECT DISTINCT`` SQL clause.
Other lookup options
====================
There are a few other ways of more directly controlling the generated SQL
for the lookup. Note that by definition these extra lookups may not be
portable to different database engines (since you're explicitly writing
SQL code) and should be avoided where ever possible.:
portable to different database engines (because you're explicitly writing
SQL code) and should be avoided if possible.:
``params``
----------
@ -233,7 +255,8 @@ parameters to be substituted.
----------
The ``select`` keyword allows you to select extra fields. This should be a
dict mapping field names to a SQL clause to use for that field. For example::
dictionary mapping attribute names to a SQL clause to use to calculate that
attribute. For example::
polls.get_list(
select={
@ -241,8 +264,8 @@ dict mapping field names to a SQL clause to use for that field. For example::
}
)
Each of the resulting ``Poll`` objects will have an extra ``choice_count`` with
a count of associated ``Choice`` objects. Note that the parenthesis required by
Each of the resulting ``Poll`` objects will have an extra attribute, ``choice_count``,
an integer count of associated ``Choice`` objects. Note that the parenthesis required by
most database engines around sub-selects are not required in Django's ``select``
clauses.
@ -250,9 +273,20 @@ clauses.
----------------------
If you need to explicitly pass extra ``WHERE`` clauses -- perhaps to perform
non-explicit joins -- use the ``where`` keyword.. If you need to
non-explicit joins -- use the ``where`` keyword. If you need to
join other tables into your query, you can pass their names to ``tables``.
``where`` and ``tables`` both take a list of strings. All ``where`` parameters
are "AND"ed to any other search criteria.
For example::
polls.get_list(question__startswith='Who', where=['id IN (3, 4, 5, 20)'])
...translates (roughly) into the following SQL:
SELECT * FROM polls_polls WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' AND id IN (3, 4, 5, 20);
Creating new objects
====================