From 69839e97b9f1e0fc402b330d73d4c482f0d38caa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Berker Peksag <berker.peksag@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:28:32 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [1.10.x] Simplified has_perm() example in
 topics/auth/customizing.txt.

Backport of 0a6ed6b1d9dadd0916e887ff9026cf206be36a5c from master
---
 docs/topics/auth/customizing.txt | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/topics/auth/customizing.txt b/docs/topics/auth/customizing.txt
index 6d84759831..cec98fc7a5 100644
--- a/docs/topics/auth/customizing.txt
+++ b/docs/topics/auth/customizing.txt
@@ -192,10 +192,7 @@ fairly simply::
     class SettingsBackend(object):
         ...
         def has_perm(self, user_obj, perm, obj=None):
-            if user_obj.username == settings.ADMIN_LOGIN:
-                return True
-            else:
-                return False
+            return user_obj.username == settings.ADMIN_LOGIN
 
 This gives full permissions to the user granted access in the above example.
 Notice that in addition to the same arguments given to the associated