Fixed #24895 -- Fixed loading a pair of squashed migrations with a dependency.
This commit is contained in:
parent
262d4db8c4
commit
84522c0d16
|
@ -224,15 +224,29 @@ class MigrationLoader(object):
|
||||||
for child_key in reverse_dependencies.get(replaced, set()):
|
for child_key in reverse_dependencies.get(replaced, set()):
|
||||||
if child_key in migration.replaces:
|
if child_key in migration.replaces:
|
||||||
continue
|
continue
|
||||||
# child_key may appear in a replacement
|
# List of migrations whose dependency on `replaced` needs
|
||||||
|
# to be updated to a dependency on `key`.
|
||||||
|
to_update = []
|
||||||
|
# Child key may itself be replaced, in which case it might
|
||||||
|
# not be in `normal` anymore (depending on whether we've
|
||||||
|
# processed its replacement yet). If it's present, we go
|
||||||
|
# ahead and update it; it may be deleted later on if it is
|
||||||
|
# replaced, but there's no harm in updating it regardless.
|
||||||
|
if child_key in normal:
|
||||||
|
to_update.append(normal[child_key])
|
||||||
|
# If the child key is replaced, we update its replacement's
|
||||||
|
# dependencies too, if necessary. (We don't know if this
|
||||||
|
# replacement will actually take effect or not, but either
|
||||||
|
# way it's OK to update the replacing migration).
|
||||||
if child_key in reverse_replacements:
|
if child_key in reverse_replacements:
|
||||||
for replaced_child_key in reverse_replacements[child_key]:
|
for replaces_child_key in reverse_replacements[child_key]:
|
||||||
if replaced in replacing[replaced_child_key].dependencies:
|
if replaced in replacing[replaces_child_key].dependencies:
|
||||||
replacing[replaced_child_key].dependencies.remove(replaced)
|
to_update.append(replacing[replaces_child_key])
|
||||||
replacing[replaced_child_key].dependencies.append(key)
|
# Actually perform the dependency update on all migrations
|
||||||
else:
|
# that require it.
|
||||||
normal[child_key].dependencies.remove(replaced)
|
for migration_needing_update in to_update:
|
||||||
normal[child_key].dependencies.append(key)
|
migration_needing_update.dependencies.remove(replaced)
|
||||||
|
migration_needing_update.dependencies.append(key)
|
||||||
normal[key] = migration
|
normal[key] = migration
|
||||||
# Mark the replacement as applied if all its replaced ones are
|
# Mark the replacement as applied if all its replaced ones are
|
||||||
if all(applied_statuses):
|
if all(applied_statuses):
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -43,3 +43,7 @@ Bugfixes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Allowed using ``choices`` longer than 1 day with ``DurationField``
|
* Allowed using ``choices`` longer than 1 day with ``DurationField``
|
||||||
(:ticket:`24897`).
|
(:ticket:`24897`).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Fixed a crash when loading squashed migrations from two apps with a
|
||||||
|
dependency between them, where the dependent app's replaced migrations are
|
||||||
|
partially applied (:ticket:`24895`).
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -259,12 +259,37 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||||
loader.build_graph()
|
loader.build_graph()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
plan = set(loader.graph.forwards_plan(('app1', '4_auto')))
|
plan = set(loader.graph.forwards_plan(('app1', '4_auto')))
|
||||||
expected_plan = set([
|
expected_plan = {
|
||||||
('app1', '4_auto'),
|
('app1', '4_auto'),
|
||||||
('app1', '2_squashed_3'),
|
('app1', '2_squashed_3'),
|
||||||
('app2', '1_squashed_2'),
|
('app2', '1_squashed_2'),
|
||||||
('app1', '1_auto')
|
('app1', '1_auto')
|
||||||
])
|
}
|
||||||
|
self.assertEqual(plan, expected_plan)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={
|
||||||
|
"app1": "migrations.test_migrations_squashed_complex_multi_apps.app1",
|
||||||
|
"app2": "migrations.test_migrations_squashed_complex_multi_apps.app2",
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
@modify_settings(INSTALLED_APPS={'append': [
|
||||||
|
"migrations.test_migrations_squashed_complex_multi_apps.app1",
|
||||||
|
"migrations.test_migrations_squashed_complex_multi_apps.app2",
|
||||||
|
]})
|
||||||
|
def test_loading_squashed_complex_multi_apps_partially_applied(self):
|
||||||
|
loader = MigrationLoader(connection)
|
||||||
|
recorder = MigrationRecorder(connection)
|
||||||
|
recorder.record_applied('app1', '1_auto')
|
||||||
|
recorder.record_applied('app1', '2_auto')
|
||||||
|
loader.build_graph()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
plan = set(loader.graph.forwards_plan(('app1', '4_auto')))
|
||||||
|
plan = plan - loader.applied_migrations
|
||||||
|
expected_plan = {
|
||||||
|
('app1', '4_auto'),
|
||||||
|
('app1', '3_auto'),
|
||||||
|
('app2', '1_squashed_2'),
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(plan, expected_plan)
|
self.assertEqual(plan, expected_plan)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations_squashed_erroneous"})
|
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations_squashed_erroneous"})
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue