Fixed #16302 -- Ensure contrib.comments is IPv6 capable

Changed the ip_address field for Comment to GenericIPAddressField. Added
instructions to the release notes on how to update the schema of existing
databases.
This commit is contained in:
Erik Romijn 2013-02-24 13:20:41 +01:00
parent e4ee3d8fca
commit ade992c61e
3 changed files with 57 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ class Comment(BaseCommentAbstractModel):
# Metadata about the comment
submit_date = models.DateTimeField(_('date/time submitted'), default=None)
ip_address = models.IPAddressField(_('IP address'), blank=True, null=True)
ip_address = models.GenericIPAddressField(_('IP address'), unpack_ipv4=True, blank=True, null=True)
is_public = models.BooleanField(_('is public'), default=True,
help_text=_('Uncheck this box to make the comment effectively ' \
'disappear from the site.'))

View File

@ -149,6 +149,30 @@ Backwards incompatible changes in 1.6
{{ title }}{# Translators: Extracted and associated with 'Welcome' below #}
<h1>{% trans "Welcome" %}</h1>
* The :doc:`comments </ref/contrib/comments/index>` app now uses a ``GenericIPAddressField``
for storing commenters' IP addresses, to support comments submitted from IPv6 addresses.
Until now, it stored them in an ``IPAddressField``, which is only meant to support IPv4.
When saving a comment made from an IPv6 address, the address would be silently truncated
on MySQL databases, and raise an exception on Oracle.
You will need to change the column type in your database to benefit from this change.
For MySQL, execute this query on your project's database:
.. code-block:: sql
ALTER TABLE django_comments MODIFY ip_address VARCHAR(39);
For Oracle, execute this query:
.. code-block:: sql
ALTER TABLE DJANGO_COMMENTS MODIFY (ip_address VARCHAR2(39));
If you do not apply this change, the behaviour is unchanged: on MySQL, IPv6 addresses
are silently truncated; on Oracle, an exception is generated. No database
change is needed for SQLite or PostgreSQL databases.
.. warning::
In addition to the changes outlined in this section, be sure to review the

View File

@ -101,13 +101,43 @@ class CommentViewTests(CommentTestCase):
settings.DEBUG = olddebug
def testCreateValidComment(self):
address = "1.2.3.4"
a = Article.objects.get(pk=1)
data = self.getValidData(a)
self.response = self.client.post("/post/", data, REMOTE_ADDR="1.2.3.4")
self.response = self.client.post("/post/", data, REMOTE_ADDR=address)
self.assertEqual(self.response.status_code, 302)
self.assertEqual(Comment.objects.count(), 1)
c = Comment.objects.all()[0]
self.assertEqual(c.ip_address, "1.2.3.4")
self.assertEqual(c.ip_address, address)
self.assertEqual(c.comment, "This is my comment")
def testCreateValidCommentIPv6(self):
"""
Test creating a valid comment with a long IPv6 address.
Note that this test should fail when Comment.ip_address is an IPAddress instead of a GenericIPAddress,
but does not do so on SQLite or PostgreSQL, because they use the TEXT and INET types, which already
allow storing an IPv6 address internally.
"""
address = "2a02::223:6cff:fe8a:2e8a"
a = Article.objects.get(pk=1)
data = self.getValidData(a)
self.response = self.client.post("/post/", data, REMOTE_ADDR=address)
self.assertEqual(self.response.status_code, 302)
self.assertEqual(Comment.objects.count(), 1)
c = Comment.objects.all()[0]
self.assertEqual(c.ip_address, address)
self.assertEqual(c.comment, "This is my comment")
def testCreateValidCommentIPv6Unpack(self):
address = "::ffff:18.52.18.52"
a = Article.objects.get(pk=1)
data = self.getValidData(a)
self.response = self.client.post("/post/", data, REMOTE_ADDR=address)
self.assertEqual(self.response.status_code, 302)
self.assertEqual(Comment.objects.count(), 1)
c = Comment.objects.all()[0]
# We trim the '::ffff:' bit off because it is an IPv4 addr
self.assertEqual(c.ip_address, address[7:])
self.assertEqual(c.comment, "This is my comment")
def testPostAsAuthenticatedUser(self):