Fixed #12864 -- Corrected handling of new user creation when a multi-database router is in place. Thanks to haris@dubizzle.com for the report.

git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@12488 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
Russell Keith-Magee 2010-02-22 13:09:02 +00:00
parent 2fc19d8d6f
commit eb67e449dd
2 changed files with 60 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ class UserManager(models.Manager):
user.set_password(password)
else:
user.set_unusable_password()
user.save(using=self.db)
user.save(using=self._db)
return user
def create_superuser(self, username, email, password):
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ class UserManager(models.Manager):
u.is_staff = True
u.is_active = True
u.is_superuser = True
u.save(using=self.db)
u.save(using=self._db)
return u
def make_random_password(self, length=10, allowed_chars='abcdefghjkmnpqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZ23456789'):

View File

@ -659,15 +659,31 @@ class TestRouter(object):
return True
class AuthRouter(object):
# Another test router. This one doesn't do anything interesting
# other than validate syncdb behavior
"""A router to control all database operations on models in
the contrib.auth application"""
def db_for_read(self, model, **hints):
"Point all read operations on auth models to 'default'"
if model._meta.app_label == 'auth':
# We use default here to ensure we can tell the difference
# between a read request and a write request for Auth objects
return 'default'
return None
def db_for_write(self, model, **hints):
"Point all operations on auth models to 'other'"
if model._meta.app_label == 'auth':
return 'other'
return None
def allow_relation(self, obj1, obj2, **hints):
"Allow any relation if a model in Auth is involved"
if obj1._meta.app_label == 'auth' or obj2._meta.app_label == 'auth':
return True
return None
def allow_syncdb(self, db, model):
"Make sure the auth app only appears on the 'other' db"
if db == 'other':
return model._meta.app_label == 'auth'
elif model._meta.app_label == 'auth':
@ -749,7 +765,7 @@ class RouterTestCase(TestCase):
router.routers = [WriteRouter(), AuthRouter(), TestRouter()]
self.assertEquals(router.db_for_read(User), 'other')
self.assertEquals(router.db_for_read(User), 'default')
self.assertEquals(router.db_for_read(Book), 'other')
self.assertEquals(router.db_for_write(User), 'writer')
@ -1107,6 +1123,45 @@ class RouterTestCase(TestCase):
review3.content_object = dive
self.assertEquals(review3._state.db, 'default')
class AuthTestCase(TestCase):
multi_db = True
def setUp(self):
# Make the 'other' database appear to be a slave of the 'default'
self.old_routers = router.routers
router.routers = [AuthRouter()]
def tearDown(self):
# Restore the 'other' database as an independent database
router.routers = self.old_routers
def test_auth_manager(self):
"The methods on the auth manager obey database hints"
# Create one user using default allocation policy
User.objects.create_user('alice', 'alice@example.com')
# Create another user, explicitly specifying the database
User.objects.db_manager('default').create_user('bob', 'bob@example.com')
# The second user only exists on the other database
alice = User.objects.using('other').get(username='alice')
self.assertEquals(alice.username, 'alice')
self.assertEquals(alice._state.db, 'other')
self.assertRaises(User.DoesNotExist, User.objects.using('default').get, username='alice')
# The second user only exists on the default database
bob = User.objects.using('default').get(username='bob')
self.assertEquals(bob.username, 'bob')
self.assertEquals(bob._state.db, 'default')
self.assertRaises(User.DoesNotExist, User.objects.using('other').get, username='bob')
# That is... there is one user on each database
self.assertEquals(User.objects.using('default').count(), 1)
self.assertEquals(User.objects.using('other').count(), 1)
class UserProfileTestCase(TestCase):
def setUp(self):