django/docs/design_philosophies.txt

245 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

===================
Design philosophies
===================
This document explains some of the fundamental philosophies Django's developers
have used in creating the framework. Its goal is to explain the past and guide
the future.
Overall
=======
Loose coupling
--------------
A fundamental goal of Django's stack is `loose coupling and tight cohesion`_.
The various layers of the framework shouldn't "know" about each other unless
absolutely necessary.
For example, the template system knows nothing about Web requests, the database
layer knows nothing about data display and the view system doesn't care which
template system a programmer uses.
.. _`loose coupling and tight cohesion`: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CouplingAndCohesion
Less code
---------
Django apps should use as little code as possible; they should lack boilerplate.
Django should take full advantage of Python's dynamic capabilities, such as
introspection.
Quick development
-----------------
The point of a Web framework in the 21st century is to make the tedious aspects
of Web development fast. Django should allow for incredibly quick Web
development.
Don't repeat yourself (DRY)
---------------------------
Every distinct concept and/or piece of data should live in one, and only one,
place. Redundancy is bad. Normalization is good.
The framework, within reason, should deduce as much as possible from as little
as possible.
Explicit is better than implicit
--------------------------------
This, a `core Python principle`_, means Django shouldn't do too much "magic."
Magic shouldn't happen unless there's a really good reason for it.
.. _`core Python principle`: http://www.python.org/doc/Humor.html#zen
Consistency
-----------
The framework should be consistent at all levels. Consistency applies to
everything from low-level (the Python coding style used) to high-level (the
"experience" of using Django).
Models
======
Explicit is better than implicit
--------------------------------
Fields shouldn't assume certain behaviors based solely on the name of the
field. This requires too much knowledge of the system and is prone to errors.
Instead, behaviors should be based on keyword arguments and, in some cases, on
the type of the field.
Include all relevant domain logic
---------------------------------
Models should encapsulate every aspect of an "object," following Martin
Fowler's `Active Record`_ design pattern.
This is why model-specific admin options are included in the model itself; data
related to a model should be stored *in* the model.
.. _`Active Record`: http://www.martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/activeRecord.html
Database API
============
The core goals of the database API are:
SQL efficiency
--------------
It should execute SQL statements as few times as possible, and it should
optimize statements internally.
This is why developers need to call ``save()`` explicitly, rather than the
framework saving things behind the scenes silently.
This is also why the ``select_related`` argument exists. It's an optional
performance booster for the common case of selecting "every related object."
Terse, powerful syntax
----------------------
The database API should allow rich, expressive statements in as little syntax
as possible. It should not rely on importing other modules or helper objects.
Joins should be performed automatically, behind the scenes, when necessary.
Every object should be able to access every related object, systemwide. This
access should work both ways.
Option to drop into raw SQL easily, when needed
-----------------------------------------------
The database API should realize it's a shortcut but not necessarily an
end-all-be-all. The framework should make it easy to write custom SQL -- entire
statements, or just custom ``WHERE`` clauses as custom parameters to API calls.
URL design
==========
Loose coupling
--------------
URLs in a Django app should not be coupled to the underlying Python code. Tying
URLs to Python function names is a Bad And Ugly Thing.
Along these lines, the Django URL system should allow URLs for the same app to
be different in different contexts. For example, one site may put stories at
``/stories/``, while another may use ``/news/``.
Infinite flexibility
--------------------
URLs should be as flexible as possible. Any conceivable URL design should be
allowed.
Encourage best practices
------------------------
The framework should make it just as easy (or even easier) for a developer to
design pretty URLs than ugly ones.
File extensions in Web-page URLs should be avoided.
Definitive URLs
---------------
Technically, ``foo.com/bar`` and ``foo.com/bar/`` are two different URLs, and
search-engine robots (and some Web traffic-analyzing tools) would treat them as
separate pages. Django should make an effort to "normalize" URLs so that
search-engine robots don't get confused.
This is the reasoning behind the ``APPEND_SLASH`` setting.
Template system
===============
Separate logic from presentation
--------------------------------
We see a template system as a tool that controls presentation and
presentation-related logic -- and that's it. The template system shouldn't
support functionality that goes beyond this basic goal.
If we wanted to put everything in templates, we'd be using PHP. Been there,
done that, wised up.
Discourage redundancy
---------------------
The majority of dynamic Web sites use some sort of common sitewide design --
a common header, footer, navigation bar, etc. The Django template system should
make it easy to store those elements in a single place, eliminating duplicate
code.
This is the philosophy behind template inheritance.
Be decoupled from HTML
----------------------
The template system shouldn't be designed so that it only outputs HTML. It
should be equally good at generating other text-based formats, or just plain
text.
Assume designer competence
--------------------------
The template system shouldn't be designed so that templates necessarily are
displayed nicely in WYSIWYG editors such as Dreamweaver. That is too severe of
a limitation and wouldn't allow the syntax to be as nice as it is. Django
expects some level of code competence in template authors.
Treat whitespace obviously
--------------------------
The template system do magic things with whitespace. If a template includes
whitespace, the system should treat the whitespace as it treats text -- just
display it.
Don't invent a programming language
-----------------------------------
The template system intentionally doesn't allow the following:
* Assignment to variables
* Advanced logic
The goal is not to invent a programming language. The goal is to offer just
enough programming-esque functionality, such as branching and looping, that are
essential for making presentation-related decisions.
Extensibility
-------------
The template system should recognize that advanced template authors may want
to extend its technology.
This is the philosophy behind custom template tags and filters.
Views
=====
Simplicity
----------
Writing a view should be as simple as writing a Python function. Developers
shouldn't have to instantiate a class when a function will do.
Use request objects
-------------------
Views should have access to a request object -- an object that stores metadata
about the current request. The object should be passed directly to a view
function, rather than the view function having to access the request data from
a global variable. This makes it light, clean and easy to test views by passing
in "fake" request objects.
Loose coupling
--------------
A view shouldn't care about which template system the developer uses -- or even
whether a template system is used at all.