mirror of https://github.com/django/django.git
[1.5.x] Deprecated depth kwarg on select_related.
This is the start of a deprecation path for the depth kwarg on select_related. Removing this will allow us to update select_related so it chains properly and have an API similar to prefetch_related. Thanks to Marc Tamlyn for spearheading and initial patch. refs #16855
This commit is contained in:
parent
75fb8f433f
commit
0131da0622
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ The main QuerySet implementation. This provides the public API for the ORM.
|
||||||
import copy
|
import copy
|
||||||
import itertools
|
import itertools
|
||||||
import sys
|
import sys
|
||||||
|
import warnings
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
from django.core import exceptions
|
from django.core import exceptions
|
||||||
from django.db import connections, router, transaction, IntegrityError
|
from django.db import connections, router, transaction, IntegrityError
|
||||||
|
@ -698,6 +699,9 @@ class QuerySet(object):
|
||||||
If fields are specified, they must be ForeignKey fields and only those
|
If fields are specified, they must be ForeignKey fields and only those
|
||||||
related objects are included in the selection.
|
related objects are included in the selection.
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
|
if 'depth' in kwargs:
|
||||||
|
warnings.warn('The "depth" keyword argument has been deprecated.\n'
|
||||||
|
'Use related field names instead.', PendingDeprecationWarning)
|
||||||
depth = kwargs.pop('depth', 0)
|
depth = kwargs.pop('depth', 0)
|
||||||
if kwargs:
|
if kwargs:
|
||||||
raise TypeError('Unexpected keyword arguments to select_related: %s'
|
raise TypeError('Unexpected keyword arguments to select_related: %s'
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ these changes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* The ``daily_cleanup.py`` script will be removed.
|
* The ``daily_cleanup.py`` script will be removed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* The ``depth`` keyword argument will be removed from
|
||||||
|
:meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.select_related`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2.0
|
2.0
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -676,21 +676,12 @@ Note that, by default, ``select_related()`` does not follow foreign keys that
|
||||||
have ``null=True``.
|
have ``null=True``.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Usually, using ``select_related()`` can vastly improve performance because your
|
Usually, using ``select_related()`` can vastly improve performance because your
|
||||||
app can avoid many database calls. However, in situations with deeply nested
|
app can avoid many database calls. However, there are times you are only
|
||||||
sets of relationships ``select_related()`` can sometimes end up following "too
|
interested in specific related models, or have deeply nested sets of
|
||||||
many" relations, and can generate queries so large that they end up being slow.
|
relationships, and in these cases ``select_related()`` can can be optimized by
|
||||||
|
explicitly passing the related field names you are interested in. Only
|
||||||
|
the specified relations will be followed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In these situations, you can use the ``depth`` argument to ``select_related()``
|
|
||||||
to control how many "levels" of relations ``select_related()`` will actually
|
|
||||||
follow::
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
b = Book.objects.select_related(depth=1).get(id=4)
|
|
||||||
p = b.author # Doesn't hit the database.
|
|
||||||
c = p.hometown # Requires a database call.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Sometimes you only want to access specific models that are related to your root
|
|
||||||
model, not all of the related models. In these cases, you can pass the related
|
|
||||||
field names to ``select_related()`` and it will only follow those relations.
|
|
||||||
You can even do this for models that are more than one relation away by
|
You can even do this for models that are more than one relation away by
|
||||||
separating the field names with double underscores, just as for filters. For
|
separating the field names with double underscores, just as for filters. For
|
||||||
example, if you have this model::
|
example, if you have this model::
|
||||||
|
@ -730,6 +721,17 @@ You can also refer to the reverse direction of a
|
||||||
is defined. Instead of specifying the field name, use the :attr:`related_name
|
is defined. Instead of specifying the field name, use the :attr:`related_name
|
||||||
<django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name>` for the field on the related object.
|
<django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name>` for the field on the related object.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.. deprecated:: 1.5
|
||||||
|
The ``depth`` parameter to ``select_related()`` has been deprecated. You
|
||||||
|
should replace it with the use of the ``(*fields)`` listing specific
|
||||||
|
related fields instead as documented above.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A depth limit of relationships to follow can also be specified::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
b = Book.objects.select_related(depth=1).get(id=4)
|
||||||
|
p = b.author # Doesn't hit the database.
|
||||||
|
c = p.hometown # Requires a database call.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` is not traversed in the reverse
|
A :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` is not traversed in the reverse
|
||||||
direction if you are performing a depth-based ``select_related()`` call.
|
direction if you are performing a depth-based ``select_related()`` call.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -638,3 +638,10 @@ The :djadmin:`cleanup` management command has been deprecated and replaced by
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The undocumented ``daily_cleanup.py`` script has been deprecated. Use the
|
The undocumented ``daily_cleanup.py`` script has been deprecated. Use the
|
||||||
:djadmin:`clearsessions` management command instead.
|
:djadmin:`clearsessions` management command instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
``depth`` keyword argument in ``select_related``
|
||||||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The ``depth`` keyword argument in
|
||||||
|
:meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.select_related` has been deprecated.
|
||||||
|
You should use field names instead.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue