From 05737128de79ec1935ba7df31f9c34258e869b3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gary Wilson Jr Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:13:14 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed #9902 -- Corrected misspelling in form validation documentation, thanks zunzun. git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9674 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37 --- docs/ref/forms/validation.txt | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/ref/forms/validation.txt b/docs/ref/forms/validation.txt index 3cfd6e0bfb5..6f5041f6998 100644 --- a/docs/ref/forms/validation.txt +++ b/docs/ref/forms/validation.txt @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ There is an example of modifying ``self._errors`` in the following section. if it's not for external usage. In this case, you are subclassing the ``Form`` class, so you are essentially writing new internals. In effect, you are given permission to access some of the internals of ``Form``. - + Of course, any code outside your form should never access ``_errors`` directly. The data is available to external code through the ``errors`` property, which populates ``_errors`` before returning it). @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ extra design effort to create a sensible form display. The details are worth noting, however. Firstly, earlier we mentioned that you might need to check if the field name keys already exist in the ``_errors`` dictionary. In this case, since we know the fields exist in ``self.cleaned_data``, they must have been -valid when cleaned as individual fields, so there will be no corresonding +valid when cleaned as individual fields, so there will be no corresponding entries in ``_errors``. Secondly, once we have decided that the combined data in the two fields we are @@ -302,4 +302,3 @@ In fact, Django will currently completely wipe out the ``cleaned_data`` dictionary if there are any errors in the form. However, this behaviour may change in the future, so it's not a bad idea to clean up after yourself in the first place. -