p31829507
/
django
mirror of https://github.com/django/django.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[4.2.x] Added missing backticks in docs. 

Backport of 02376f1f53 from main
This commit is contained in:
Mariusz Felisiak 2023-07-21 12:54:38 +02:00
parent c99d935600
commit 1f9d00ef9f
3 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/ref/models/options.txt
View File

@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ not be looking at your Django code. For example::
unique_together = ["driver", "restaurant"] unique_together = ["driver", "restaurant"]
A :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` cannot be included in A :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` cannot be included in
unique_together. (It's not clear what that would even mean!) If you ``unique_together``. (It's not clear what that would even mean!) If you
need to validate uniqueness related to a need to validate uniqueness related to a
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`, try using a signal or :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`, try using a signal or
an explicit :attr:`through <ManyToManyField.through>` model. an explicit :attr:`through <ManyToManyField.through>` model.

5
docs/releases/1.8.2.txt
View File

@ -48,8 +48,9 @@ Bugfixes
* Fixed ``isnull`` lookup for ``HStoreField`` (:ticket:`24751`). * Fixed ``isnull`` lookup for ``HStoreField`` (:ticket:`24751`).
* Fixed a MySQL crash when a migration removes a combined index (unique_together * Fixed a MySQL crash when a migration removes a combined index (
or index_together) containing a foreign key (:ticket:`24757`). ``unique_together`` or ``index_together``) containing a foreign key
(:ticket:`24757`).
* Fixed session cookie deletion when using :setting:`SESSION_COOKIE_DOMAIN` * Fixed session cookie deletion when using :setting:`SESSION_COOKIE_DOMAIN`
(:ticket:`24799`). (:ticket:`24799`).

2
docs/topics/db/transactions.txt
View File

@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ will fail with the error "current transaction is aborted, queries ignored
until end of transaction block". While the basic use of ``save()`` is unlikely until end of transaction block". While the basic use of ``save()`` is unlikely
to raise an exception in PostgreSQL, there are more advanced usage patterns to raise an exception in PostgreSQL, there are more advanced usage patterns
which might, such as saving objects with unique fields, saving using the which might, such as saving objects with unique fields, saving using the
force_insert/force_update flag, or invoking custom SQL. ``force_insert``/``force_update`` flag, or invoking custom SQL.
There are several ways to recover from this sort of error. There are several ways to recover from this sort of error.