Added a ManyToManyField(db_constraint=False) option, this allows not creating constraints on the intermediary models.

This commit is contained in:
Alex Gaynor 2013-03-07 11:24:51 -08:00
parent 4cccb85e29
commit bbbd698c7a
5 changed files with 65 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@ -955,7 +955,9 @@ class OneToOneRel(ManyToOneRel):
class ManyToManyRel(object):
def __init__(self, to, related_name=None, limit_choices_to=None,
symmetrical=True, through=None):
symmetrical=True, through=None, db_constraint=True):
if through and not db_constraint:
raise ValueError("Can't supply a through model and db_constraint=False")
self.to = to
self.related_name = related_name
if limit_choices_to is None:
@ -964,6 +966,7 @@ class ManyToManyRel(object):
self.symmetrical = symmetrical
self.multiple = True
self.through = through
self.db_constraint = db_constraint
def is_hidden(self):
"Should the related object be hidden?"
@ -1196,15 +1199,15 @@ def create_many_to_many_intermediary_model(field, klass):
return type(name, (models.Model,), {
'Meta': meta,
'__module__': klass.__module__,
from_: models.ForeignKey(klass, related_name='%s+' % name, db_tablespace=field.db_tablespace),
to: models.ForeignKey(to_model, related_name='%s+' % name, db_tablespace=field.db_tablespace)
from_: models.ForeignKey(klass, related_name='%s+' % name, db_tablespace=field.db_tablespace, db_constraint=field.rel.db_constraint),
to: models.ForeignKey(to_model, related_name='%s+' % name, db_tablespace=field.db_tablespace, db_constraint=field.rel.db_constraint)
})
class ManyToManyField(RelatedField, Field):
description = _("Many-to-many relationship")
def __init__(self, to, **kwargs):
def __init__(self, to, db_constraint=True, **kwargs):
try:
assert not to._meta.abstract, "%s cannot define a relation with abstract class %s" % (self.__class__.__name__, to._meta.object_name)
except AttributeError: # to._meta doesn't exist, so it must be RECURSIVE_RELATIONSHIP_CONSTANT
@ -1219,13 +1222,15 @@ class ManyToManyField(RelatedField, Field):
related_name=kwargs.pop('related_name', None),
limit_choices_to=kwargs.pop('limit_choices_to', None),
symmetrical=kwargs.pop('symmetrical', to == RECURSIVE_RELATIONSHIP_CONSTANT),
through=kwargs.pop('through', None))
through=kwargs.pop('through', None),
db_constraint=db_constraint,
)
self.db_table = kwargs.pop('db_table', None)
if kwargs['rel'].through is not None:
assert self.db_table is None, "Cannot specify a db_table if an intermediary model is used."
Field.__init__(self, **kwargs)
super(ManyToManyField, self).__init__(**kwargs)
msg = _('Hold down "Control", or "Command" on a Mac, to select more than one.')
self.help_text = string_concat(self.help_text, ' ', msg)

View File

@ -1227,6 +1227,20 @@ that control how the relationship functions.
the table for the model defining the relationship and the name of the field
itself.
.. attribute:: ManyToManyField.db_constraint
Controls whether or not constraints should be created in the database for
the foreign keys in the intermediary table. The default is ``True``, and
that's almost certainly what you want; setting this to ``False`` can be
very bad for data integrity. That said, here are some scenarios where you
might want to do this:
* You have legacy data that is not valid.
* You're sharding your database.
It is an error to pass both ``db_constraint`` and ``through``.
.. _ref-onetoone:
``OneToOneField``

View File

@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ Minor features
* The ``MemcachedCache`` cache backend now uses the latest :mod:`pickle`
protocol available.
* Added the :attr:`django.db.models.ForeignKey.db_constraint`
option.
* Added the :attr:`django.db.models.ForeignKey.db_constraint` and
:attr:`django.db.models.ManyToManyField.db_constraint` options.
* The jQuery library embedded in the admin has been upgraded to version 1.9.1.

View File

@ -90,7 +90,10 @@ class Item(models.Model):
@python_2_unicode_compatible
class Object(models.Model):
pass
related_objects = models.ManyToManyField("self", db_constraint=False, symmetrical=False)
def __str__(self):
return str(self.id)
@python_2_unicode_compatible

View File

@ -12,13 +12,12 @@ from django.db import (backend, connection, connections, DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS,
from django.db.backends.signals import connection_created
from django.db.backends.postgresql_psycopg2 import version as pg_version
from django.db.models import Sum, Avg, Variance, StdDev
from django.db.utils import ConnectionHandler, DatabaseError
from django.db.utils import ConnectionHandler
from django.test import (TestCase, skipUnlessDBFeature, skipIfDBFeature,
TransactionTestCase)
from django.test.utils import override_settings, str_prefix
from django.utils import six
from django.utils import six, unittest
from django.utils.six.moves import xrange
from django.utils import unittest
from . import models
@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ class OracleChecks(unittest.TestCase):
convert_unicode = backend.convert_unicode
cursor = connection.cursor()
cursor.callproc(convert_unicode('DBMS_SESSION.SET_IDENTIFIER'),
[convert_unicode('_django_testing!'),])
[convert_unicode('_django_testing!')])
@unittest.skipUnless(connection.vendor == 'oracle',
"No need to check Oracle cursor semantics")
@ -99,6 +98,7 @@ class OracleChecks(unittest.TestCase):
c.execute(query)
self.assertEqual(c.fetchone()[0], 1)
class MySQLTests(TestCase):
@unittest.skipUnless(connection.vendor == 'mysql',
"Test valid only for MySQL")
@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ class LastExecutedQueryTest(TestCase):
self.assertEqual(connection.queries[-1]['sql'],
str_prefix("QUERY = %(_)s\"SELECT strftime('%%Y', 'now');\" - PARAMS = ()"))
class ParameterHandlingTest(TestCase):
def test_bad_parameter_count(self):
"An executemany call with too many/not enough parameters will raise an exception (Refs #12612)"
@ -191,8 +192,9 @@ class ParameterHandlingTest(TestCase):
connection.ops.quote_name('root'),
connection.ops.quote_name('square')
))
self.assertRaises(Exception, cursor.executemany, query, [(1,2,3),])
self.assertRaises(Exception, cursor.executemany, query, [(1,),])
self.assertRaises(Exception, cursor.executemany, query, [(1, 2, 3)])
self.assertRaises(Exception, cursor.executemany, query, [(1,)])
# Unfortunately, the following tests would be a good test to run on all
# backends, but it breaks MySQL hard. Until #13711 is fixed, it can't be run
@ -240,6 +242,7 @@ class LongNameTest(TestCase):
for statement in connection.ops.sql_flush(no_style(), tables, sequences):
cursor.execute(statement)
class SequenceResetTest(TestCase):
def test_generic_relation(self):
"Sequence names are correct when resetting generic relations (Ref #13941)"
@ -257,6 +260,7 @@ class SequenceResetTest(TestCase):
obj = models.Post.objects.create(name='New post', text='goodbye world')
self.assertTrue(obj.pk > 10)
class PostgresVersionTest(TestCase):
def assert_parses(self, version_string, version):
self.assertEqual(pg_version._parse_version(version_string), version)
@ -291,6 +295,7 @@ class PostgresVersionTest(TestCase):
conn = OlderConnectionMock()
self.assertEqual(pg_version.get_version(conn), 80300)
class PostgresNewConnectionTest(TestCase):
"""
#17062: PostgreSQL shouldn't roll back SET TIME ZONE, even if the first
@ -338,17 +343,18 @@ class ConnectionCreatedSignalTest(TestCase):
@skipUnlessDBFeature('test_db_allows_multiple_connections')
def test_signal(self):
data = {}
def receiver(sender, connection, **kwargs):
data["connection"] = connection
connection_created.connect(receiver)
connection.close()
cursor = connection.cursor()
connection.cursor()
self.assertTrue(data["connection"].connection is connection.connection)
connection_created.disconnect(receiver)
data.clear()
cursor = connection.cursor()
connection.cursor()
self.assertTrue(data == {})
@ -443,7 +449,7 @@ class BackendTestCase(TestCase):
old_password = connection.settings_dict['PASSWORD']
connection.settings_dict['PASSWORD'] = "françois"
try:
cursor = connection.cursor()
connection.cursor()
except DatabaseError:
# As password is probably wrong, a database exception is expected
pass
@ -470,6 +476,7 @@ class BackendTestCase(TestCase):
with self.assertRaises(DatabaseError):
cursor.execute(query)
# We don't make these tests conditional because that means we would need to
# check and differentiate between:
# * MySQL+InnoDB, MySQL+MYISAM (something we currently can't do).
@ -477,7 +484,6 @@ class BackendTestCase(TestCase):
# on or not, something that would be controlled by runtime support and user
# preference.
# verify if its type is django.database.db.IntegrityError.
class FkConstraintsTests(TransactionTestCase):
def setUp(self):
@ -581,6 +587,7 @@ class ThreadTests(TestCase):
connections_dict = {}
connection.cursor()
connections_dict[id(connection)] = connection
def runner():
# Passing django.db.connection between threads doesn't work while
# connections[DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS] does.
@ -616,6 +623,7 @@ class ThreadTests(TestCase):
connections_dict = {}
for conn in connections.all():
connections_dict[id(conn)] = conn
def runner():
from django.db import connections
for conn in connections.all():
@ -682,6 +690,7 @@ class ThreadTests(TestCase):
"""
# First, without explicitly enabling the connection for sharing.
exceptions = set()
def runner1():
def runner2(other_thread_connection):
try:
@ -699,6 +708,7 @@ class ThreadTests(TestCase):
# Then, with explicitly enabling the connection for sharing.
exceptions = set()
def runner1():
def runner2(other_thread_connection):
try:
@ -746,3 +756,14 @@ class DBConstraintTestCase(TransactionTestCase):
with self.assertRaises(models.Object.DoesNotExist):
ref.obj
def test_many_to_many(self):
obj = models.Object.objects.create()
obj.related_objects.create()
self.assertEqual(models.Object.objects.count(), 2)
self.assertEqual(obj.related_objects.count(), 1)
intermediary_model = models.Object._meta.get_field_by_name("related_objects")[0].rel.through
intermediary_model.objects.create(from_object_id=obj.id, to_object_id=12345)
self.assertEqual(obj.related_objects.count(), 1)
self.assertEqual(intermediary_model.objects.count(), 2)