On CockroachDB, primary key values stored in these fields are larger
than they accept. Fixes:
queries.test_bulk_update.BulkUpdateNoteTests.test_multiple_fields,
queries.test_bulk_update.BulkUpdateNoteTests.test_inherited_fields, and
queries.tests.RelatedLookupTypeTests.test_values_queryset_lookup.
Thanks to Adam Johnson, Carlton Gibson, Mariusz Felisiak, and Raphael
Michel for mentoring this Google Summer of Code 2019 project and
everyone else who helped with the patch.
Special thanks to Mads Jensen, Nick Pope, and Simon Charette for
extensive reviews.
Co-authored-by: Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mariusz@gmail.com>
Expressions referring to different bound fields should not be
considered equal.
Thanks Julien Enselme for the detailed report.
Regression in bc7e288ca9.
Ticket #24090 was already fixed by
b68212f539, this commit adds tests to
verify this is indeed the case.
Thanks to Beauhurst for commissioning the work on this ticket.
Added relabeled_clone() method to sql.Query to fix the problem. It
manifested itself in rare cases where at least double nested subquery's
filter condition might target non-existing alias.
Thanks to Trac alias ris for reporting the problem.
This commit introduced a new class JoinPromoter that can be used to
abstract away join promotion problems for complex filter conditions.
Query._add_q() and Query.combine() now use the new class.
Also, added a lot of comments about why join promotion is done the way
it is.
Thanks to Tim Graham for original report and testing the changes, and
for Loic Bistuer for review.
In cases where the same connection (from model A to model B along the
same field) was needed multiple times in a select_related query, the
join setup code mistakenly reused an existing join.
The sql/query.py add_q method did a lot of where/having tree hacking to
get complex queries to work correctly. The logic was refactored so that
it should be simpler to understand. The new logic should also produce
leaner WHERE conditions.
The changes cascade somewhat, as some other parts of Django (like
add_filter() and WhereNode) expect boolean trees in certain format or
they fail to work. So to fix the add_q() one must fix utils/tree.py,
some things in add_filter(), WhereNode and so on.
This commit also fixed add_filter to see negate clauses up the path.
A query like .exclude(Q(reversefk__in=a_list)) didn't work similarly to
.filter(~Q(reversefk__in=a_list)). The reason for this is that only
the immediate parent negate clauses were seen by add_filter, and thus a
tree like AND: (NOT AND: (AND: condition)) will not be handled
correctly, as there is one intermediary AND node in the tree. The
example tree is generated by .exclude(~Q(reversefk__in=a_list)).
Still, aggregation lost connectors in OR cases, and F() objects and
aggregates in same filter clause caused GROUP BY problems on some
databases.
Fixed#17600, fixed#13198, fixed#17025, fixed#17000, fixed#11293.
django-bot
Ömer Faruk Abacı
Jacob Walls
Tim Graham
Hasan Ramezani
Nicolas Baccelli
Simon Charette
sage
Nick Pope
Johannes Hoppe
Simon Charette
can
Tom Forbes
Mariusz Felisiak
Bo Marchman
François Freitag
chillaranand
Claude Paroz
Adam Chainz
Chris Lamb
Josh Soref
Flavio Curella
Anssi Kääriäinen
Anssi Kääriäinen
Collin Anderson
Anubhav Joshi
zsoldosp
Rodolfo Carvalho
Jason Myers
Aymeric Augustin