101 lines
3.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
101 lines
3.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. _yieldfixture:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fixture functions using "yield" / context manager integration
|
||
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. versionadded:: 2.4
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. regendoc:wipe
|
||
|
|
||
|
pytest-2.4 allows fixture functions to seamlessly use a ``yield`` instead
|
||
|
of a ``return`` statement to provide a fixture value while otherwise
|
||
|
fully supporting all other fixture features.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Let's look at a simple standalone-example using the ``yield`` syntax::
|
||
|
|
||
|
# content of test_yield.py
|
||
|
|
||
|
import pytest
|
||
|
|
||
|
@pytest.yield_fixture
|
||
|
def passwd():
|
||
|
print ("\nsetup before yield")
|
||
|
f = open("/etc/passwd")
|
||
|
yield f.readlines()
|
||
|
print ("teardown after yield")
|
||
|
f.close()
|
||
|
|
||
|
def test_has_lines(passwd):
|
||
|
print ("test called")
|
||
|
assert passwd
|
||
|
|
||
|
In contrast to :ref:`finalization through registering callbacks
|
||
|
<finalization>`, our fixture function used a ``yield``
|
||
|
statement to provide the lines of the ``/etc/passwd`` file.
|
||
|
The code after the ``yield`` statement serves as the teardown code,
|
||
|
avoiding the indirection of registering a teardown callback function.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Let's run it with output capturing disabled::
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ py.test -q -s test_yield.py
|
||
|
|
||
|
setup before yield
|
||
|
test called
|
||
|
.teardown after yield
|
||
|
|
||
|
1 passed in 0.12 seconds
|
||
|
|
||
|
We can also seamlessly use the new syntax with ``with`` statements.
|
||
|
Let's simplify the above ``passwd`` fixture::
|
||
|
|
||
|
# content of test_yield2.py
|
||
|
|
||
|
import pytest
|
||
|
|
||
|
@pytest.yield_fixture
|
||
|
def passwd():
|
||
|
with open("/etc/passwd") as f:
|
||
|
yield f.readlines()
|
||
|
|
||
|
def test_has_lines(passwd):
|
||
|
assert len(passwd) >= 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
The file ``f`` will be closed after the test finished execution
|
||
|
because the Python ``file`` object supports finalization when
|
||
|
the ``with`` statement ends.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Note that the yield fixture form supports all other fixture
|
||
|
features such as ``scope``, ``params``, etc., thus changing existing
|
||
|
fixture functions to use ``yield`` is straightforward.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. note::
|
||
|
|
||
|
While the ``yield`` syntax is similar to what
|
||
|
:py:func:`contextlib.contextmanager` decorated functions
|
||
|
provide, with pytest fixture functions the part after the
|
||
|
"yield" will always be invoked, independently from the
|
||
|
exception status of the test function which uses the fixture.
|
||
|
This behaviour makes sense if you consider that many different
|
||
|
test functions might use a module or session scoped fixture.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Discussion and future considerations / feedback
|
||
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||
|
|
||
|
There are some topics that are worth mentioning:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- usually ``yield`` is used for producing multiple values.
|
||
|
But fixture functions can only yield exactly one value.
|
||
|
Yielding a second fixture value will get you an error.
|
||
|
It's possible we can evolve pytest to allow for producing
|
||
|
multiple values as an alternative to current parametrization.
|
||
|
For now, you can just use the normal
|
||
|
:ref:`fixture parametrization <fixture-parametrize>`
|
||
|
mechanisms together with ``yield``-style fixtures.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- lastly ``yield`` introduces more than one way to write
|
||
|
fixture functions, so what's the obvious way to a newcomer?
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you want to feedback or participate in discussion of the above
|
||
|
topics, please join our :ref:`contact channels`, you are most welcome.
|