test_ok2/_pytest/mark.py

312 lines
11 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

""" generic mechanism for marking and selecting python functions. """
import inspect
2015-03-24 04:28:29 +08:00
class MarkerError(Exception):
2015-03-24 04:28:29 +08:00
"""Error in use of a pytest marker/attribute."""
def pytest_namespace():
return {'mark': MarkGenerator()}
def pytest_addoption(parser):
group = parser.getgroup("general")
group._addoption(
'-k',
action="store", dest="keyword", default='', metavar="EXPRESSION",
help="only run tests which match the given substring expression. "
2012-11-20 21:20:39 +08:00
"An expression is a python evaluatable expression "
2013-05-22 13:41:46 +08:00
"where all names are substring-matched against test names "
"and their parent classes. Example: -k 'test_method or test "
"other' matches all test functions and classes whose name "
"contains 'test_method' or 'test_other'. "
"Additionally keywords are matched to classes and functions "
"containing extra names in their 'extra_keyword_matches' set, "
"as well as functions which have names assigned directly to them."
)
group._addoption(
"-m",
action="store", dest="markexpr", default="", metavar="MARKEXPR",
help="only run tests matching given mark expression. "
"example: -m 'mark1 and not mark2'."
)
group.addoption(
"--markers", action="store_true",
help="show markers (builtin, plugin and per-project ones)."
)
parser.addini("markers", "markers for test functions", 'linelist')
def pytest_cmdline_main(config):
import _pytest.config
if config.option.markers:
config._do_configure()
tw = _pytest.config.create_terminal_writer(config)
for line in config.getini("markers"):
name, rest = line.split(":", 1)
tw.write("@pytest.mark.%s:" % name, bold=True)
tw.line(rest)
tw.line()
config._ensure_unconfigure()
return 0
pytest_cmdline_main.tryfirst = True
def pytest_collection_modifyitems(items, config):
keywordexpr = config.option.keyword
matchexpr = config.option.markexpr
if not keywordexpr and not matchexpr:
return
# pytest used to allow "-" for negating
# but today we just allow "-" at the beginning, use "not" instead
# we probably remove "-" alltogether soon
if keywordexpr.startswith("-"):
keywordexpr = "not " + keywordexpr[1:]
selectuntil = False
if keywordexpr[-1:] == ":":
selectuntil = True
keywordexpr = keywordexpr[:-1]
remaining = []
deselected = []
for colitem in items:
if keywordexpr and not matchkeyword(colitem, keywordexpr):
deselected.append(colitem)
else:
if selectuntil:
keywordexpr = None
if matchexpr:
if not matchmark(colitem, matchexpr):
deselected.append(colitem)
continue
remaining.append(colitem)
if deselected:
config.hook.pytest_deselected(items=deselected)
items[:] = remaining
class MarkMapping:
"""Provides a local mapping for markers where item access
resolves to True if the marker is present. """
def __init__(self, keywords):
mymarks = set()
for key, value in keywords.items():
if isinstance(value, MarkInfo) or isinstance(value, MarkDecorator):
mymarks.add(key)
self._mymarks = mymarks
def __getitem__(self, name):
return name in self._mymarks
class KeywordMapping:
"""Provides a local mapping for keywords.
Given a list of names, map any substring of one of these names to True.
"""
def __init__(self, names):
self._names = names
def __getitem__(self, subname):
for name in self._names:
if subname in name:
return True
return False
def matchmark(colitem, markexpr):
"""Tries to match on any marker names, attached to the given colitem."""
return eval(markexpr, {}, MarkMapping(colitem.keywords))
def matchkeyword(colitem, keywordexpr):
"""Tries to match given keyword expression to given collector item.
Will match on the name of colitem, including the names of its parents.
Only matches names of items which are either a :class:`Class` or a
:class:`Function`.
Additionally, matches on names in the 'extra_keyword_matches' set of
any item, as well as names directly assigned to test functions.
"""
mapped_names = set()
# Add the names of the current item and any parent items
import pytest
for item in colitem.listchain():
if not isinstance(item, pytest.Instance):
mapped_names.add(item.name)
# Add the names added as extra keywords to current or parent items
for name in colitem.listextrakeywords():
mapped_names.add(name)
# Add the names attached to the current function through direct assignment
if hasattr(colitem, 'function'):
for name in colitem.function.__dict__:
mapped_names.add(name)
mapping = KeywordMapping(mapped_names)
if " " not in keywordexpr:
# special case to allow for simple "-k pass" and "-k 1.3"
return mapping[keywordexpr]
elif keywordexpr.startswith("not ") and " " not in keywordexpr[4:]:
return not mapping[keywordexpr[4:]]
return eval(keywordexpr, {}, mapping)
def pytest_configure(config):
import pytest
if config.option.strict:
pytest.mark._config = config
class MarkGenerator:
""" Factory for :class:`MarkDecorator` objects - exposed as
a ``pytest.mark`` singleton instance. Example::
import pytest
@pytest.mark.slowtest
def test_function():
pass
will set a 'slowtest' :class:`MarkInfo` object
on the ``test_function`` object. """
def __getattr__(self, name):
if name[0] == "_":
raise AttributeError("Marker name must NOT start with underscore")
if hasattr(self, '_config'):
self._check(name)
return MarkDecorator(name)
def _check(self, name):
try:
if name in self._markers:
return
except AttributeError:
pass
self._markers = l = set()
for line in self._config.getini("markers"):
beginning = line.split(":", 1)
x = beginning[0].split("(", 1)[0]
l.add(x)
if name not in self._markers:
raise AttributeError("%r not a registered marker" % (name,))
def istestfunc(func):
return hasattr(func, "__call__") and \
getattr(func, "__name__", "<lambda>") != "<lambda>"
class MarkDecorator:
""" A decorator for test functions and test classes. When applied
it will create :class:`MarkInfo` objects which may be
:ref:`retrieved by hooks as item keywords <excontrolskip>`.
MarkDecorator instances are often created like this::
mark1 = pytest.mark.NAME # simple MarkDecorator
mark2 = pytest.mark.NAME(name1=value) # parametrized MarkDecorator
and can then be applied as decorators to test functions::
@mark2
def test_function():
pass
fix handling MarkDecorators called with a single positional plus keyword args When a MarkDecorator instance is called it does the following: 1. If called with a single class as its only positional argument and no additional keyword arguments, it attaches itself to the class so it gets applied automatically to all test cases found in that class. 2. If called with a single function as its only positional argument and no additional keyword arguments, it attaches a MarkInfo object to the function, containing all the arguments already stored internally in the MarkDecorator. 3. When called in any other case, it performs a 'fake construction' call, i.e. it returns a new MarkDecorator instance with the original MarkDecorator's content updated with the arguments passed to this call. When Python applies a function decorator it always passes the target class/ function to the decorator as its positional argument with no additional positional or keyword arguments. However, when MarkDecorator was deciding whether it was being called to decorate a target function/class (cases 1. & 2. as documented above) or to return an updated MarkDecorator (case 3. as documented above), it only checked that it received a single callable positional argument and did not take into consideration whether additional keyword arguments were being passed in as well. With this change, it is now possible to create a pytest mark storing a function/ class parameter passed as its only positional argument and accompanied by one or more additional keyword arguments. Before, it was only possible to do so if the function/class parameter argument was accompanied by at least one other positional argument. Added a related unit test. Updated MarkDecorator doc-string.
2014-01-20 08:27:33 +08:00
When a MarkDecorator instance is called it does the following:
1. If called with a single class as its only positional argument and no
additional keyword arguments, it attaches itself to the class so it
gets applied automatically to all test cases found in that class.
2. If called with a single function as its only positional argument and
no additional keyword arguments, it attaches a MarkInfo object to the
function, containing all the arguments already stored internally in
the MarkDecorator.
3. When called in any other case, it performs a 'fake construction' call,
i.e. it returns a new MarkDecorator instance with the original
MarkDecorator's content updated with the arguments passed to this
call.
Note: The rules above prevent MarkDecorator objects from storing only a
single function or class reference as their positional argument with no
additional keyword or positional arguments.
"""
def __init__(self, name, args=None, kwargs=None):
self.name = name
self.args = args or ()
self.kwargs = kwargs or {}
@property
def markname(self):
return self.name # for backward-compat (2.4.1 had this attr)
def __repr__(self):
d = self.__dict__.copy()
name = d.pop('name')
return "<MarkDecorator %r %r>" % (name, d)
def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs):
""" if passed a single callable argument: decorate it with mark info.
otherwise add *args/**kwargs in-place to mark information. """
fix handling MarkDecorators called with a single positional plus keyword args When a MarkDecorator instance is called it does the following: 1. If called with a single class as its only positional argument and no additional keyword arguments, it attaches itself to the class so it gets applied automatically to all test cases found in that class. 2. If called with a single function as its only positional argument and no additional keyword arguments, it attaches a MarkInfo object to the function, containing all the arguments already stored internally in the MarkDecorator. 3. When called in any other case, it performs a 'fake construction' call, i.e. it returns a new MarkDecorator instance with the original MarkDecorator's content updated with the arguments passed to this call. When Python applies a function decorator it always passes the target class/ function to the decorator as its positional argument with no additional positional or keyword arguments. However, when MarkDecorator was deciding whether it was being called to decorate a target function/class (cases 1. & 2. as documented above) or to return an updated MarkDecorator (case 3. as documented above), it only checked that it received a single callable positional argument and did not take into consideration whether additional keyword arguments were being passed in as well. With this change, it is now possible to create a pytest mark storing a function/ class parameter passed as its only positional argument and accompanied by one or more additional keyword arguments. Before, it was only possible to do so if the function/class parameter argument was accompanied by at least one other positional argument. Added a related unit test. Updated MarkDecorator doc-string.
2014-01-20 08:27:33 +08:00
if args and not kwargs:
func = args[0]
is_class = inspect.isclass(func)
if len(args) == 1 and (istestfunc(func) or is_class):
if is_class:
if hasattr(func, 'pytestmark'):
mark_list = func.pytestmark
if not isinstance(mark_list, list):
mark_list = [mark_list]
# always work on a copy to avoid updating pytestmark
# from a superclass by accident
mark_list = mark_list + [self]
func.pytestmark = mark_list
else:
func.pytestmark = [self]
else:
holder = getattr(func, self.name, None)
if holder is None:
holder = MarkInfo(
self.name, self.args, self.kwargs
)
setattr(func, self.name, holder)
else:
holder.add(self.args, self.kwargs)
return func
kw = self.kwargs.copy()
kw.update(kwargs)
args = self.args + args
return self.__class__(self.name, args=args, kwargs=kw)
class MarkInfo:
""" Marking object created by :class:`MarkDecorator` instances. """
def __init__(self, name, args, kwargs):
#: name of attribute
self.name = name
#: positional argument list, empty if none specified
self.args = args
#: keyword argument dictionary, empty if nothing specified
2015-07-25 21:38:27 +08:00
self.kwargs = kwargs.copy()
self._arglist = [(args, kwargs.copy())]
def __repr__(self):
return "<MarkInfo %r args=%r kwargs=%r>" % (
self.name, self.args, self.kwargs
)
def add(self, args, kwargs):
""" add a MarkInfo with the given args and kwargs. """
self._arglist.append((args, kwargs))
self.args += args
self.kwargs.update(kwargs)
def __iter__(self):
""" yield MarkInfo objects each relating to a marking-call. """
for args, kwargs in self._arglist:
yield MarkInfo(self.name, args, kwargs)