From 6a237bd49fa0e4e6785d3aa092192b861680c54b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Widman <jeff@jeffwidman.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:27:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Changed back to "parametrized" to match the API

--HG--
branch : jeffwidman/fix-faq-grammar-and-spelling-1423641159173
---
 doc/en/faq.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/en/faq.txt b/doc/en/faq.txt
index 48d99675b..2f7bd17d2 100644
--- a/doc/en/faq.txt
+++ b/doc/en/faq.txt
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ Is using pytest fixtures versus xUnit setup a style question?
 
 For simple applications and for people experienced with nose_ or
 unittest-style test setup using `xUnit style setup`_ probably
-feels natural.  For larger test suites, parameterized testing
+feels natural.  For larger test suites, parametrized testing
 or setup of complex test resources using funcargs_ may feel more natural.
 Moreover, funcargs are ideal for writing advanced test support
 code (like e.g. the monkeypatch_, the tmpdir_ or capture_ funcargs)