Fix spelling: explicitely --> explicitly
This commit is contained in:
parent
ce4eb51ee0
commit
6be6798cdf
|
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ tags: feature
|
|||
|
||||
- introduce pytest.mark.nocollect for not considering a function for
|
||||
test collection at all. maybe also introduce a pytest.mark.test to
|
||||
explicitely mark a function to become a tested one. Lookup JUnit ways
|
||||
explicitly mark a function to become a tested one. Lookup JUnit ways
|
||||
of tagging tests.
|
||||
|
||||
introduce pytest.mark.importorskip
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ def skip(msg=""):
|
|||
skip.Exception = Skipped
|
||||
|
||||
def fail(msg="", pytrace=True):
|
||||
""" explicitely fail an currently-executing test with the given Message.
|
||||
""" explicitly fail an currently-executing test with the given Message.
|
||||
|
||||
:arg pytrace: if false the msg represents the full failure information
|
||||
and no python traceback will be reported.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ class _MultiCall:
|
|||
|
||||
# XXX note that the __multicall__ argument is supported only
|
||||
# for pytest compatibility reasons. It was never officially
|
||||
# supported there and is explicitely deprecated since 2.8
|
||||
# supported there and is explicitly deprecated since 2.8
|
||||
# so we can remove it soon, allowing to avoid the below recursion
|
||||
# in execute() and simplify/speed up the execute loop.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ For an example on how to add and work with markers from a plugin, see
|
|||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
It is recommended to explicitely register markers so that:
|
||||
It is recommended to explicitly register markers so that:
|
||||
|
||||
* there is one place in your test suite defining your markers
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue