Merge pull request #2859 from OwenTuz/issue-2692-document-setup-teardown-mismatch-in-unittest-integration
2692.docs document setup/teardown behaviour when using unittest-based su…
This commit is contained in:
commit
b61cbc4fba
|
@ -233,3 +233,13 @@ was executed ahead of the ``test_method``.
|
|||
overwrite ``unittest.TestCase`` ``__call__`` or ``run``, they need to
|
||||
to overwrite ``debug`` in the same way (this is also true for standard
|
||||
unittest).
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
Due to architectural differences between the two frameworks, setup and
|
||||
teardown for ``unittest``-based tests is performed during the ``call`` phase
|
||||
of testing instead of in ``pytest``'s standard ``setup`` and ``teardown``
|
||||
stages. This can be important to understand in some situations, particularly
|
||||
when reasoning about errors. For example, if a ``unittest``-based suite
|
||||
exhibits errors during setup, ``pytest`` will report no errors during its
|
||||
``setup`` phase and will instead raise the error during ``call``.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue