ruff is faster and handle everything we had prior.
isort configuration done based on the indication from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/4670, previousely based on
reorder-python-import (#11896)
flake8-docstrings was a wrapper around pydocstyle (now archived) that
explicitly asks to use ruff in https://github.com/PyCQA/pydocstyle/pull/658.
flake8-typing-import is useful mainly for project that support python 3.7
and the one useful check will be implemented in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/2302
We need to keep blacken-doc because ruff does not handle detection
of python code inside .md and .rst. The direct link to the repo is
now used to avoid a redirection.
Manual fixes:
- Lines that became too long
- % formatting that was not done automatically
- type: ignore that were moved around
- noqa of hard to fix issues (UP031 generally)
- fmt: off and fmt: on that is not really identical
between black and ruff
- autofix re-order in pre-commit from faster to slower
Co-authored-by: Ran Benita <ran@unusedvar.com>
* [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* manual fixes after configuration update
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Sottile <asottile@umich.edu>
In current pytest, the same expression is matched against all items. But
it is re-parsed for every match.
Add support for "compiling" an expression and reusing the result. Errors
may only occur during compilation.
This is done by parsing the expression into a Python `ast.Expression`,
then `compile()`ing it into a code object. Evaluation is then done using
`eval()`.
Note: historically we used to use `eval` directly on the user input --
this is not the case here, the expression is entirely under our control
according to our grammar, we just JIT-compile it to Python as a
(completely safe) optimization.
Previously, the expressions given to the `-m` and `-k` options were
evaluated with `eval`. This causes a few issues:
- Python keywords cannot be used.
- Constants like numbers, None, True, False are not handled correctly.
- Various syntax like numeric operators and `X if Y else Z` is supported
unintentionally.
- `eval()` is somewhat dangerous for arbitrary input.
- Can fail in many ways so requires `except Exception`.
The format we want to support is quite simple, so change to a custom
parser. This fixes the issues above, and gives us full control of the
format, so can be documented comprehensively and even be extended in the
future if we wish.
Pierre Sassoulas
Alexander King
Ran Benita
pre-commit-ci[bot]